I've read many discussions about showers and growers. All the studies say that when erect there is no difference in length between a shower and grower. I actually think all these studies want all men, especially growers, to feel good about their dick size. I'm not buying it. If one man has a one inch flaccid dick and the man next to him has a five inch flaccid dick I'm convinced that the man with the five inch flaccid dick will have a much bigger erection than the man with the one inch flaccid dick. Anyone back me up on my theory?
No, that's totally false. The very definition of a show-er is that they are larger flaccid and don't grow (ratio wise) as much as a grow-er would.
Totally wrong !! Growers have different expansion ratio
This exactly! The smallest I've been flaccid is 1 inch long, coming in from being out in the cold for a while. My 'normal' flaccid size is about 2.5 inches. I still grow to 7 by 6 when erect. Women with lots of experience, and penis size surveys put me in the 95th percentile for length and 99th percentile for girth.
I've looked at a lot of "from soft to hard" videos on Pornhub, for research only you understand, and I'm still convinced that a larger flaccid cock gets bigger when erect than a small flaccid cock. I'm sure there are exceptions but for the most part I think my theory is true.
Effectively you are disagreeing with all the actual penis size research. Pornhub is not 'research'.
You'd have to look at vintage porn, where they weren't afraid of showing men flaccid and being brought to erection, to see just how 'small' some of the huge porn stars are when they are completely flaccid.
