- jkc,
Welp, there goes that dream, haha.It was just a random person's review on letterboxd. They said something like "it loses a star for having full frontal female nudity but no male"
Welp, there goes that dream, haha.It was just a random person's review on letterboxd. They said something like "it loses a star for having full frontal female nudity but no male"
Let's not jump the gun before we see film. Imbd says male frontal nudityWell, now we know... Not surprised!
Also, it looks like no immediate digital release on Friday.
Out of Cannes it was confirmed that Tye Sheridan went full frontal in the film. You can check a couple(like 10 pages back)Let's not jump the gun before we see film. Imbd says male frontal nudity
Well in America don't show male frontal often but we have no concrete evidence until film is out so still hopeful to see all of TyeOut of Cannes it was confirmed that Tye Sheridan went full frontal in the film. You can check a couple(like 10 pages back)
M guess is that maybe they re-edited it since it was received so poorly last year
I never have hope with nudity especially if there are contradicting reportsWell in America don't show male frontal often but we have no concrete evidence until film is out so still hopeful to see all of Tye
I never have hope with nudity especially if there are contradicting reports
But we'll see I guess maybe they'll play the original version
Not surprising. The filmmakers will take criticism from Cannes and then make adjustments before its debut in theaters. The reception wasn't good last year, so likely made some changes and did reshoots as well. The trailer did look promising, so maybe it's a better movie now.Out of Cannes it was confirmed that Tye Sheridan went full frontal in the film. You can check a couple(like 10 pages back)
M guess is that maybe they re-edited it since it was received so poorly last year
You are absolutely speaking for yourself, here. I want to see everything. Ass, dick, balls—all of it. Not some suggestive upper thigh that leaves things to the imagination. It's a big demand, but I'm making it, as are most people here.But I don't really need a frontal as long as we get some nice other nudity from him. I'm good.
No. I'm not the only one. This isn't a porn movie. For that stick to actual porn. Asking any mainstream Hollywood actor to show their dick is already a big ask, which is why body doubles are used for some of those scenes that call for it. It seems Tye did it for the Cannes version, but I never expected it for the actual film release (welcome though).You are absolutely speaking for yourself, here. I want to see everything. Ass, dick, balls—all of it. Not some suggestive upper thigh that leaves things to the imagination. It's a big demand, but I'm making it, as are most people here.
100%No. I'm not the only one. This isn't a porn movie. For that stick to actual porn. Asking any mainstream Hollywood actor to show their dick is already a big ask, which is why body doubles are used for some of those scenes that call for it. It seems Tye did it for the Cannes version, but I never expected it for the actual film release (welcome though).
I'm fine, along with likely many others with Tye showing his ass in multiple scenes, frontal is just an unexpected, but welcome bonus.
It seems Tye did it for the Cannes version, but I never expected it for the actual film release (welcome though).
You provided the logic and answer to your question within your own post!Going full frontal has become more commonplace in mainstream movies and TV shows, relatively speaking of course. The negative reviews were about other issues. It's not like what happened with A Home at the End of the World, in which Colin Farrell's penis was apparently a distraction for test audiences, so the scene ended up being cut.
Trying to fix a movie that wasn't well received is one thing, but why would this theoretical scene be cut in the theatrical release? Why would it ever have been a problem?
Weiner Weiner chicken dinnerpray for the ween