In that context, I meant that such a person cannot be considered straight. (I'll drop the 100% because anything less than 100% is not "straight" in my book). But your first question prompts a dilemma. If a person's sexuality can change, then how does that square with the "born that way" contention? Does it not give credibility to abhorrent past practices to reform a gay person? Or can one's sexuality only change in one direction; i.e., heterosexual to homosexual but never homosexual to heterosexual? It seems to me that the same people who reject the notion that homosexuals can become heterosexuals would embrace the notion that a person's sexuality can change!
Is my straight friend potentially gay?
- Thread starter pantone_15
- Start date
Similar threads
