"Hung" doesnt mean hung anymore

AiDaHoe

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2024
Posts
6
Media
0
Likes
15
Points
3
If a guy is "hung", his dick is so big, and or, long, it hangs down his legs, similar to a horse's dick aka "hung like a horse"

So why is it, any guy with a moderately "big" dick is referred to as hung? Especially when the dick curves up to the stars or points straight outward, its not hanging, its not hung.

If it's big, just say big or use one of the other bajillion adjectives

And before the asshats come to say "it's not that big of a deal", first of all why even click on the thread, second of all its not, I'm just saying how incorrectly it's used now
 

AceWilde

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Posts
380
Media
3
Likes
1,431
Points
288
Location
Boston (Massachusetts, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
I guess I never thought "hung" was short for "hung like a horse" and more that it was still big but not that big? I always thought it was short for "well hung" which to me means something different than "well hung like a horse" or whatever.
 

FrankieGuile

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2023
Posts
1,179
Media
0
Likes
1,110
Points
133
Location
San Diego, California,United States
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
If a guy is "hung", his dick is so big, and or, long, it hangs down his legs, similar to a horse's dick aka "hung like a horse"

So why is it, any guy with a moderately "big" dick is referred to as hung? Especially when the dick curves up to the stars or points straight outward, its not hanging, its not hung.

If it's big, just say big or use one of the other bajillion adjectives

And before the asshats come to say "it's not that big of a deal", first of all why even click on the thread, second of all its not, I'm just saying how incorrectly it's used now
You are creating your own definition of "hung" and then criticizing others for not adhering to it. As an aside, it is odd you presume people will say "it's not that big of a deal" such that you feel compelled to preemptively characterize them as "asshats." Doing so is an example of setting up your own straw man just to knock him down. In both cases, it is evident you assume quite a lot in error.
 

deepthroat_me_now

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Posts
3
Media
0
Likes
5
Points
148
Location
New Jersey
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Im finding the same thing going on with "deepthroat". Please don't call it deepthroat if it isn't truly isn't entering your throat. There are waaay too many porn videos out there labeled "deepthroat" in which there is no deepthroat happening. In legit deepthroat, the entire cock must enter your mouth to the hilt and it must be long enough to get past your tongue and enter your throat cavity down past your tonsils.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RaskaYu

RaskaYu

Expert Member
Joined
May 3, 2024
Posts
63
Media
0
Likes
164
Points
33
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
By the way what the fuck does hung actually mean. I can get that huge is bigger than big and monster is for the truly big and rare but hung just stands there as a term.

In Spanish we have "dotado" which is reminiscent of "gifted" (as in IQ) and it kinda makes sense, as IQ and penis size are a Gauss bell distribution and you can consider everything up from a standard deviation as "gifted" or "genius" if it's rarer or whatever. There have been some jokes about this term overlap (i.e. "went to a quiz show for gifted men to show my huge cock but failed every fucking answer and security had to take me out of the building!")

A lot of big dicked twinks get labeled as huge. Aside of the "hanging" quality, are we sure it's not a matter of more factors such as being skinny and having it look disproportionately big?
 
  • Like
Reactions: B8M8