Relationships
Posted 12-20-2007 at 06:50 PM by Male Bonding etc
I once mentioned having a relationship with another guy and he thought it only meant sexual. Perhaps it's because I am so "literal" in my interpretation of some words and concepts, but "sexual" is only one kind of relationship.
Anyone who's read more than 3 or 4 of my posts would probably know that I am more interested in meaningful emotional, intellectual, even spiritual relationships than I am merely sexual ones. That's not to say that I don't relish sex, far from it, but it is only one facet of who I am and only one fraction of what makes me come to LPSG.
Anyone who's read more than 3 or 4 of my posts would probably know that I am more interested in meaningful emotional, intellectual, even spiritual relationships than I am merely sexual ones. That's not to say that I don't relish sex, far from it, but it is only one facet of who I am and only one fraction of what makes me come to LPSG.
Total Comments 8
Comments
| | Well, I'm glad I'm not the only one who comes for LPSG for more than just the sex. Who'd've thunk?! |
Posted 12-20-2007 at 07:20 PM by Not_Punny |
| | uhh. what's the question? |
Posted 12-20-2007 at 08:03 PM by guysluvme |
| | Oh, does the blog have to have a question? |
Posted 12-20-2007 at 10:55 PM by Male Bonding etc |
| | I once mentioned having a relationship with another guy and he thought it only meant sexual. Perhaps it's because I am so "literal" in my interpretation of some words and concepts, but "sexual" is only one kind of relationship. Anyone who's read more than 3 or 4 of my posts would probably know that I am more interested in meaningful emotional, intellectual, even spiritual relationships than I am merely sexual ones. That's not to say that I don't relish sex, far from it, but it is only one facet of who I am and only one fraction of what makes me come to LPSG. I'm the same way only I want all the things you mentioned with one guy. Oh, does the blog have to have a question? No, it can be a statement. ![]() |
Posted 12-21-2007 at 05:23 AM by njqt466 |
| | I suppose, njq, that if I could find all of those things with another guy, I'd be willing to label myself 100% gay... or with a woman, then 100% straight... Okay, that was a little tongue-in-cheek, but seriously, it seems we only rarely get the whole shooting match with one person. |
Posted 12-21-2007 at 05:44 AM by Male Bonding etc Updated 12-22-2007 at 07:44 AM by Male Bonding etc |
| | I never settle for less than the whole package, a relationship should be completely fulfilling in every aspect. |
Posted 12-21-2007 at 10:06 AM by SpoiledPrincess |
| | Male bonding. Check out my blog post I'm about to make on that very subject. |
Posted 12-21-2007 at 02:48 PM by Kimahri |
| | Thanks, Kimahri, I'll do that. Princess, "a relationship" may well be all of that ideally, but the relationship I have with my mother is never going to be sexual... the relationship I have with my dentist is most likely never going to be spiritual (or sexual, or emotional, for that matter). The comprehensive scope of how I relate to any number of people cannot possibly include that level of fulfillment with all of them. Last night I was at a party and met a couple I enjoyed visiting with immensely. I found myself thinking there was a little bit of sexual tension with the male partner. Perhaps I was simply reacting to the fact that we really enjoyed our conversation... and my girlfriend is out of town. Still, there was a cumulative effect with his body language, facial expressions, personal proximity that seemed to add up to possible sexual interest. So, here's the issue for me: am I simply misreading as sexual the flattering personal interest another guy shows in me? |
Posted 12-22-2007 at 07:41 AM by Male Bonding etc |
Recent Blog Entries by Male Bonding etc
- Bodybuilders and "Fitness Models" (04-22-2008)
- Pheromones (04-14-2008)
- Big Dicks and Other Attributes (12-30-2007)
- Relationships (12-20-2007)










