Quote:
Originally Posted by wingnut84  You seem to love the cock, amirite, battyboy? Do you deserve "special rights" or should you be forced to fuck vaginas like all the normal boys do? |
I figured you would out yourself as a homophobic idiot. That's why in a previous post, I encouraged you to keep posting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greekdick69 I totally 2nd that DCDEEP, in my mind there is no point in trying to convince someone to have protected sex though. It's an extremely simple concept.
If that person likes to play his/her odds (as low as they might be, because the other person looks healthy) well then that is just how much that person values his/her health and ultimately life. |
Right. It isn't condom use that helps prevent disease, it's how someone looks. Cute, attractive, young women are incapable of contracting or transmitting any disease, barebacking or not Oh, and they are all virgins, even after they have had sex. Crackwhores all have every disease known to mankind, and you will catch all those diseases just by looking at them. No "nice" person has ever had a disease.
Quote:
Would it kill them to use a condom? NO.
Would it kill them to not use a condom? Some of them are not here to post anymore or to tell us what the outcome was.
Simple!
I just don't see why some people think that out of the two choices, unprotected sex is the best one. Am I dumb?
Play safe always.
|
[irony]Yeah, you are dumb for saying "don't take chances."
[/irony] I'm still trying to figure out why wingnut thought the seatbelt analogy made any sense. Perhaps I'm the dumb one if I think wearing a seatbelt only has impact on that one person, while having sex with another person
has an impact on both of them.