LPSG.ORG

Safe porn or Bareback Porn??? Preferences??

Originally Posted by XCUZE I prefer to watch bareback because its more raw & natural. However, I do feel a little uneasy about this coz it is seriously risky. In easteuro especially the pornstars are

is part of a discussion in the Adult Websites forum that includes topics on Conversations about adult sites.


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Adult Websites

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-09-2008   #31 (permalink)
pronatalist is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by XCUZE View Post
I prefer to watch bareback because its more raw & natural. However, I do feel a little uneasy about this coz it is seriously risky. In easteuro especially the pornstars are under tremendous pressure to do bareback because thats where the gay industry has gone in the past few years. Its like they dont have a choice. Id be happy though if bareback was banned right across the board - wont happen!

ps; Matt, you say you are safe. However, look at your own initial post; if u catch something straight after the results u wont know til 30 days later.
Of course, "bareback" is so much better, because it's natural and procreative.

And porn is about fantasy, as somebody said, and they don't like for reality to intrude upon their fantasies.

Sex is so much better when it's "the real deal," helping to do their part to ENLARGE the entire human race, for the good of the populous many, not some "fake" contraceptive, shoddy-"medicated," simulation sex. Sex is supposed to be about love and making babies, not about selfishly getting one's jollies. Sex is so erotic and beautiful and natural, when you have to wonder, are they really making a baby right there?

How if health risks are a concern, why not "amateur" or husband-and-wife porn? Or is that some sort of pipe-dream fantasy or oxymoron to expect the most basic moral standards within the porn industry? Is it all lies and deceit? Use up "actors" and then throw them away? Maybe it would be more morally consistantly to just ban porn? Most all the movie industry takes great care to keep actors safe, and simulate special effects to look real without being dangerous actually, except for the porn industry, fueled even more by lust and greed than most any other "job."

Condoms are nasty, dull sensation, and quite useless when a possible pregnancy ought to be welcome anyway. Besides, condoms often break, slip off, overflow, leak, or don't even get put on in time or correctly. Who really wants to have sex with a balloon, but for the irrational fear of pregnancy?
 
Old 07-09-2008   #32 (permalink)
PinkSteel is offline

Danny
I want to see someone trying to put a small condom on you. Something like "Snugger Fit".
Add a bit of humour to the start of an erotic adventure.
 
Old 07-09-2008   #33 (permalink)
flame boy is offline

I watched a segment on Newsnight (yup, I dont just watch reality tv and dynasty re-reruns folks!) about the bareback industry within gay porn and it was so incredibly shocking. One guy contracted the HIV virus from his co-star when he was fucked bareback on film - the producers of the film carried on regardless and released the film, featuring the scene in which the guy contracts HIV. I personally found this so disturbing and upsetting that it really tainted my view on bareback porn - it may look hot but peoples lives are in danger. I think its hot and very responsable of the actors / porn studios to produce condom porn.

You can watch the 10 minute segment online: BBC NEWS | Programmes | Newsnight | HIV scandal in gay porn industry
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7