Ugly Porn Stars In The Gay Porn Industry

boby blake ewwww, def fugly.

That is so not true because most of the soo call 'hot' bald black guys with goatees are hideous and secondly porn would not be boring with only hot guys because who the hell wants to see a fugly ass dude in porn. There are some really hot black guys in gay porn that does not fit YOUR so call stereotype of a hot black dude, such as tops, Mr. Sauki, Supreme/Castro, Cam'ron, and SeVen. As for YOUR so call stereotype of a hot white dude not all of them looks like Abercrombie & Fitch models because to be honest some of them be ugly as hell case in point this dude:

Abercrombie & Fitch Model

Then, you are forgetting that all men aren't beautiful by Abercrombie+Fitch standards.
Should America dictate to us what is sexy? What is handsome?

I don't particularly find Shia LaBoeuf or Justin Timberlake sexy. I don't think that Dwight Yoakum is sexy. I don't find Al Roker sexy. I don't find Lyle Lovett sexy. BUT I wouldn't say that I wouldn't want them in porn. I think that it would be interesting if "fugli"-cious guys were in porn. It would be universal. "Fugli"-cious guys need loving too.

Because some guys aren't your type doesn't mean that they aren't going to be to others as well. This is why there is a market for amateur independent porn.

I wonder a few things:

Indeed, are some of these fellows drug-addled? Let's face it...drug use is fairly well known and documented in pornography. Some of these guys very well might have habits to support. Money in porn is easy, and let's face it; those who do drugs a lot aren't overly concerned with their general health.

OR, perhaps it's that the studios/producers are looking for very slender guys because 1) the camera adds weight and 2) a slender build emphasizes the penis, making even average endowments appear more substantial.

If you have team ups of two hotties with one who is not I would view your glass as being more than half full as opposed to being 1/2 empty. From experience I expect that one won't find all the characters in a porn film to be attractive. I'm happy enough to see my favorites featured in action and not put off by the other less interesting actors also present.

I would take issue with your statement that drug use "well known and doucumented in pornography". As somebody who has been on a few porn sets (in front of the camera and behind) making a video is not easy work particularly for the guys that supply the "wood". A hot 15min. scene may take 4or5 hours to shoot under very difficult conditions. Guys who use drugs aren't very good at this and usually end up having very short careers. I don't know of any porn studios that tolerate drug use on their sets.

You forgot my thread disclaimer on the top of my first post. The whole thing was a joke and I clearly stated not to take anything in it seriously. But I digress...

If we want to make this a serious discussion, then let's do it.

I honestly don't think there's too many ugly people in porn. If anything, they're showing various different types which makes viewing more suitable for everyone. For every person who finds someone to be cute, there's going to be another 2 or 3 people who find him (or her) butt ugly. It gets to the point of finding a particular type of man that everyone can agree on impossible. Some people look at Bobby Blake and see a stud. Others see him as a mess. Some people look at Ramon Ragazzi and see a hunk (myself included). Others think he's hideous because they hate chest hair. If you honestly believe that there's too many ugly people in porn, perhaps you should just limit your viewing to the few videos out there that cater to your finicky tastes for hot men and/or women? When it comes to beauty, there is no definitive "hot type" that works across the board. For if there was, everyone would be using it and there would still be people complaining about it.

BTW, I know of many people who would love to stick a cock in the mouth or the ass of the A&F model you just posted. He's not necessarily my type, but I wouldn't call him ugly.

hey the world is full of ugly people look around and get over yourself

I'm still enjoying uncut (pun) versions of Joe Gage's triology films. I've always had a thing for men like Richard Locke (RIP). But the Squeeze has been renting Manplay DVDs at the local video store and I have to say there's something satisfying about watching steely, well-groomed Czechs with great toned bodies, hairy asses, and going at it like rabbits as they tear off each other's suits and ties. They actually seem to be enjoying themselves as well as each other. Go figure! I have yet to see any "fuglies", but they specialize in the 30 to 45+ buff masculine types. No twinkies. One thing I do not miss living out of the USA are the Hostess Twinkies, although Bel Ami keeps stables of eastern European versions available for yea olde "I'm too pretty, so just do me" suck and gang fuck.

Hey, even Jim Bentley finally turned 40-something!

If you think they are ugly in film, you should see them in person. Burnt out, hard looking (with muscles mind you) and tanned skinned that could be mistaken for an old leather carry all from the Goodwill.

I saw several of them Sunday in the Pride parade. I don't know all their names but I've seen them ALL naked and taking it up the ass at one time or another.
They need to get out of the industry and do something else.

Some of these men just look hard and older than their actual years.

The Randy Blue guys were nice, not one sun tan in the bunch. All healthy looking, groomed and in peak physical shape. I hope it stays that way for them, nothing wrong with being older it's just the fast livin' that ruins it for them and it shows on their faces.

I might agree..but my eyes never quite make it up to his face. same with Flex Dieon Blake..eyes never make it north of his awesome nipple rings!

Hmmmm...knocking other people for commenting on Jake Cruise's lack of attractiveness in one thread...
...Whilst simultaneously passing judgment on most everybody in this thread.
...And still no pics of You anywhere to be seen.

you may be naive, or simply hang out in classier porn-circles, there's no shortage of studios with no standards that turn their eye not only to drug use, but hiv tests.

haven't you heard about that greg guy who did a bareback video and contracted hiv?? in his own initial interview, he didn't bring his test results as he wasn't expecting to do a shoot, and the studio TOOK HIS WORD FOR IT that he was negative, hence the likely failure of his lawsuit against the company). on the south side of charlotte there's an entire apartment full of guys who have hiv and are still doing video shoots, some unprotected.

is that supposed to be a surprise?? isn't al roker the fat weather guy?

Please allow me to clarify, bighosenow, that my observation was in no way intended to compromise the integrity of those above-board studios and performers who do not partake of illegal substances. Far from it. Rather, I might have more ably stated that, while the problem is not rampant, it is, nonetheless, still an issue with which to be contended much as it would be in any other endeavour.