Fox News Contributor, Liz Trotta, Wants Obama to Die

sargon20 · 05-26-2008

If America was truly committed to knocking off threats to the 'homeland' they would immediately call in an air strike on Fox News headquarters, launch a ground assault on every station and kidnap Rupert Murdoch and send him to a secret prison. These people are evil in it's purest form. I don't think you can get any more authentic.

Texasjon · 05-26-2008

Liz Trotta - Professional?

exwhysee · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotbtminla

Tripod & Vinyl, can you two please take your argument back to one of the 2 fucking simultaneous threads focused entirely on Hillary Clinton's comments?

I know LPSG threads stay on topic for about as a long as a dog ignores a shiny object, but this was turning into a potentially interesting discussion about Fox News, modern American media, wider implications on the perception of the GOP, etc.

You have at least 2 other threads in which you can have your current discussion. We don't have any other threads in which we can have this one.

Wow, hotty, so manly and domineering...

thanks for the clean-up!

Now, back to the GOP, FOX News, and ritual satanism...

thorshammer · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by sargon20

If America was truly committed to knocking off threats to the 'homeland' they would immediately call in an air strike on Fox News headquarters, launch a ground assault on every station and kidnap Rupert Murdoch and send him to a secret prison. These people are evil in it's purest form. I don't think you can get any more authentic.

Spoken like a true socialist. Kinda reminds me of the chant that 'code pink' were singing and dancing to in the streets of a Chavez rally where he was calling our president a 'dictator', I think it went 'socialism or death, socialism or death'...

George Bush has endured years of remarks involving his assassination, from 'voters' to people in the media (that would mean ALL the TV networks other than fox) to 'community' leaders and it only gets a hearty nod of agreement from 'liberals'.
Fox is no more right wing than msnbc is left wing, quite moaning about it for the
Is that how your version of the world should be run? What's next a nation wide book burning of anything that doesn't pass the modern politically correct standard? Purge the world of any dissenting thought and as long as MTV thinks it's ok it is?
If you've ever called for or wished for the presidents assassination and now you're acting outraged that another unintelligent, close-minded soul has remarked similar about your candidate, well, you know the truth and you have to go to bed at night with your hypocrisy.

Quote:

These people are evil in it's purest form.

No, I'd have to disagree, I'd nominate the Muslims that bury homosexuals and adulterers up to their armpits and then stone them to death as pure evil.
They have laws that make sure the rock isn't too big so they can't be killed in just a few blows, that hardly compares to someone introducing a bill into congress that would define marriage as between a man and a woman.
If those two are the same evil to you, then you have other problems my friends.
I nominate for the title as pure evil, the Muslims that rape and then hang teenage girls for dating someone from a different sect and call it an 'honor' killing.
How about the Muslim clerics that run genital mutilation 'clinics' for females, to keep them from becoming sexually aroused? Not as evil as FOX news?
How about Muslims who blow up a schoolyard of children being handed candy by coalition troops? Bill O'Reilly still worse?
How about the TV networks in Palestine who run cartoons on saturday mornings showing little children suicide bombing other little children?
No, God forbid that's evil, they just 'believe' different from us "who are we to judge how they live"
Ah, moral relativism always finds new stooges.
If you are gay- and I've posed this question to my close friends who happen to be gay and face to face, you get honest answers- would you feel safer spending a weekend at Bushs ranch in texas or Jerry Falwells house, OR , at al-qaeda of iraqs most recent safe house or walking down the street of tehran with your colors flying? Deep down you know who wants to behead you or stone you and who is merely close minded. Save the use of 'evil' for where it belongs kids.

I would never wish death upon anyone in or running for office, left or right wing, but then again I hold myself to higher standard of intelligence.

Damn I finally broke my rule of not engaging in political talk on a penis website,geez... I'm really asking for it with so many socialists on board...here come the personal attacks

tripod · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by thorshammer

Fox is no more right wing than msnbc is left wing.

That's not necessarily true, FOX runs a lot of distortions and half truths and presents it as news, they don't do it on a daily basis, but they play with the ethical boundaries much more often then MSNBC does. you right wingers are mad because Olbermann has a show that is attrecting more and more viewers. Olbermann is a rabid fighter for the truth, he is absolutely NOT a right wing idealogue... this Bush administration has just made him look like he is on the left wing. You don't need to be a liberal and a left winger to see that FOX news is full of crap as far as a "fair and balanced" news agency goes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by thorshammer

I'd nominate the Muslims that bury homosexuals and adulterers up to their armpits and then stone them to death as pure evil. They have laws that make sure the rock isn't too big so they can't be killed in just a few blows, that hardly compares to someone introducing a bill into congress that would define marriage as between a man and a woman.

If those two are the same evil to you, then you have other problems my friends. I nominate for the title as pure evil, the Muslims that rape and then hang teenage girls for dating someone from a different sect and call it an 'honor' killing. How about the Muslim clerics that run genital mutilation 'clinics' for females, to keep them from becoming sexually aroused? Not as evil as FOX news?

They are obviously not the same two evils, that is obvious. When people refer to the Bush administration as evil, they mean a banal sort of evil, not the raving villain that has a dark mustache. Inside our heads we say they are evil, but we mean someone who would do horrible things in the name of protecting the American conservative way of life. Rupert Murdoch and Co. are hell bent on waging a holy war against Muslims and have little respect for anyone who sees otherwise. the right wingers still have that Muslims are evil mentality and can't discern between Wahabism which comes from Saudi Arabia (Bush and Co.'s buddies) and normal everyday Muslims. Do you know the difference?

But your point makes perfect sense and I would rather my country be run by Republican conservatives than by Wahabists any day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by exwhysee

Wow, hotty, so manly and domineering...

thanks for the clean-up!

Now, back to the GOP, FOX News, and ritual satanism...

He only looks manly and domineering because I allowed him to be.

VinylBoy · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotbtminla

Tripod & Vinyl, can you two please take your argument back to one of the 2 fucking simultaneous threads focused entirely on Hillary Clinton's comments?

I know LPSG threads stay on topic for about as a long as a dog ignores a shiny object, but this was turning into a potentially interesting discussion about Fox News, modern American media, wider implications on the perception of the GOP, etc.

You have at least 2 other threads in which you can have your current discussion. We don't have any other threads in which we can have this one.

Look, all I did was make a damn comment. You're the one that brought up the Liz Trotta issue and yes, I did try to link this to other stories that share the same relevance. Huckabee, Trotta & the supposed Clinton fiasco all point to a continuing fear that has been in the back of everyone's minds for decades.

What did you want everyone to do on this thread? Just say, "I agree" or "I disagree" and stop? We all know why she mentioned it. So why not look at the whole issue and not just one isolated event?

Actually, nevermind. Everyone thinks I'm crazy anyhow, plus, very few people read my posts thoroughly to see what I'm getting at. But to satisfy you, and to keep everything focused on this one, pigeon-holed event:

What she said is stupid. It's ignorant to play on the fears of the American People. And she deserves to be fired for it. Obama's "assassination" is the new & improved Gay Marriage fear of this election and Republicans know they can press this button millions of times until November.

Happy?

Guy-jin · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by thorshammer

Spoken like a true socialist. Kinda reminds me of the chant that 'code pink' were singing and dancing to in the streets of a Chavez rally where he was calling our president a 'dictator', I think it went 'socialism or death, socialism or death'...

George Bush has endured years of remarks involving his assassination, from 'voters' to people in the media (that would mean ALL the TV networks other than fox) to 'community' leaders and it only gets a hearty nod of agreement from 'liberals'.
Fox is no more right wing than msnbc is left wing, quite moaning about it for the
Is that how your version of the world should be run? What's next a nation wide book burning of anything that doesn't pass the modern politically correct standard? Purge the world of any dissenting thought and as long as MTV thinks it's ok it is?
If you've ever called for or wished for the presidents assassination and now you're acting outraged that another unintelligent, close-minded soul has remarked similar about your candidate, well, you know the truth and you have to go to bed at night with your hypocrisy.

No, I'd have to disagree, I'd nominate the Muslims that bury homosexuals and adulterers up to their armpits and then stone them to death as pure evil.
They have laws that make sure the rock isn't too big so they can't be killed in just a few blows, that hardly compares to someone introducing a bill into congress that would define marriage as between a man and a woman.
If those two are the same evil to you, then you have other problems my friends.
I nominate for the title as pure evil, the Muslims that rape and then hang teenage girls for dating someone from a different sect and call it an 'honor' killing.
How about the Muslim clerics that run genital mutilation 'clinics' for females, to keep them from becoming sexually aroused? Not as evil as FOX news?
How about Muslims who blow up a schoolyard of children being handed candy by coalition troops? Bill O'Reilly still worse?
How about the TV networks in Palestine who run cartoons on saturday mornings showing little children suicide bombing other little children?
No, God forbid that's evil, they just 'believe' different from us "who are we to judge how they live"
Ah, moral relativism always finds new stooges.
If you are gay- and I've posed this question to my close friends who happen to be gay and face to face, you get honest answers- would you feel safer spending a weekend at Bushs ranch in texas or Jerry Falwells house, OR , at al-qaeda of iraqs most recent safe house or walking down the street of tehran with your colors flying? Deep down you know who wants to behead you or stone you and who is merely close minded. Save the use of 'evil' for where it belongs kids.

I would never wish death upon anyone in or running for office, left or right wing, but then again I hold myself to higher standard of intelligence.

Damn I finally broke my rule of not engaging in political talk on a penis website,geez... I'm really asking for it with so many socialists on board...here come the personal attacks

You keep using the word "socialist."

I do not think it means what you think it means.

anettenorge · 05-26-2008

Quote:

...here come the personal attacks

You son of a bitch, how dare you not think that Fox news is evil, you piece of shit, you should be the one who gets stoned!
msnbc is perfectly fair and balanced and if you don't agree you must die!
You're just mad that Bush and Dr Evil have been found out!

Haha , I just had to do that sorry.

Bbucko · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guy-jin

You keep using the word "socialist."

I do not think it means what you think it means.

That's pretty much what I thought. I haven't heard anyone call for nationalizing...say...the airline industry.

But if by socialist you mean 30-hour work weeks, six-week vacations, inexpensive and incredibly efficient public transportation and universal health coverage regardless of pre-existing conditions, then count me in.

Besides, I love a good parade.

HazelGod · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by VinylBoy

That's if you assume that what Clinton was doing was in fact hinting at Obama's assassination, and many people (including myself) don't believe that is true.

One comment has to be actually spun into some kind of conspiracy in order to believe.

You're beginning to sound as stupid as Trinity.

If someone with the intellectual acumen of Hillary Clinton wanted only to illustrate a point about extended nomination processes being precedented, then she would have stated that the race was still undecided in June of '68. She didn't do that...she made a point of specifically mentioning the front-runner being assassinated, leaving the "greater" point of the contest being unresolved (the one she now claims was the only point) entirely implied.

To contend this was unintentional or is an opposition misconstruction is mendacious douchebaggery...which, if nothing else, puts you on par with Hillary herself.

tripod · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bbucko

But if by socialist you mean 30-hour work weeks, six-week vacations, inexpensive and incredibly efficient public transportation and universal health coverage regardless of pre-existing conditions, then count me in.

Besides, I love a good parade.

Count me in too bro!!! I wonder if we could get the cameltoe lady steppers to lead off the parade?

westy81 · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bbucko

That's pretty much what I thought. I haven't heard anyone call for nationalizing...say...the airline industry.

But if by socialist you mean 30-hour work weeks, six-week vacations, inexpensive and incredibly efficient public transportation and universal health coverage regardless of pre-existing conditions, then count me in.

Besides, I love a good parade.

uhhhh....i have heard of some calling for the nationalizing of....say....the health care industry.....

love socialized societies do you? (in my yoda voice)....there are plenty to chose from in this world...I will stick with capitalism...it has served me well.

tripod · 05-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by westy81

uhhhh....i have heard of some calling for the nationalizing of....say....the health care industry.....

love socialized societies do you? (in my yoda voice)....there are plenty to chose from in this world...I will stick with capitalism...it has served me well.

Actually a strict socialist policy won't work and a strict capitalist one won't work either. We need to have a hybrid form of capitalism with some socialist underpinnings, something more like the U.K. or Canada. Those systems allow the individual to get very wealthy on their own merits but allow for the underprivileged to live with a certain standard of decency. They aren't perfect systems, but our country is too large to have a perfect economy.

ScaredLittleBoy · 05-26-2008

I especially like how the interviewer just carried on as if she said nothing. It was a vicious slip of the tongue

.

Is there no examination of who you let on TV in America? Could I get on TV in America?

Guy-jin · 05-26-2008

Well, I mean, the guy just spammed the word "socialist" like it's a pejorative.

This isn't the 1950s. "Socialist" has an actual meaning.

If he had been replying to someone who was calling for Fox News to be taken over and run by the government, I could understand calling him "socialist." But he was calling for the bombing of Fox News. That's not "socialist."