LPSG.ORG

to cut or not to cut

Originally Posted by jacknapier but its unhygeinic Groan, from a cut guy in Pittsburgh who thinks men (and their parents) should leave cocks alone!

is part of a discussion in the The Healthy Penis forum that includes topics on Erection concerns, Viagra, ejaculation, diseases, etc..


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > The Healthy Penis

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-22-2008   #16 (permalink)
swede82 is online now

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacknapier View Post
but its unhygeinic
Groan, from a cut guy in Pittsburgh who thinks men (and their parents) should leave cocks alone!
 
Old 05-22-2008   #17 (permalink)
jacknapier is offline
Banned

Wait a minute is this still going on? This is a joke thread. Move along.
 
Old 05-22-2008   #18 (permalink)
swede82 is online now

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncutsouthernboy View Post
Most Drs do not use anaethesia when performing circumcisions. Anaethesia is very dangerous to little persons. Yes, the babies do feel the pain. They cry and scream and pass out.

There is little medical benefit to circumcision. It is no more hygenic to be circumcised. Most of the men in the world are not circumcised and the vast majority of them have no problems with their foreskin.

Circumcisions are little more than plastic surgery done on a person that can not express his opinion on the matter. And NO a circumcised penis is not more attractive. Circumcision is amputation of healthy tissue. It is very rare that a male NEEDS a circumcision. It is not rare for a Dr to prescribe a circumcision saying the foreskin is too tight when a baby just to pay the mortgage on his house. A baby's foreskin can be attached to the glans even up to when the boy is 14 or 15 or sometimes older. It is just nature.

As for choice, I have the choice. I have done the research and the choice of circumcision is not for me.

I do know 3 or 4 guys and have talked to several others who did opt for the surgery as adults and they ALL say that it was a mistake.

Let the little feller have his dick the way HE wants it. It is all about choice. If I took you to the surgeon and had him cut on you without your permission I would be arrested. What is the difference?
Bravo. Yes, the kid who needed it done at 6 was an exception. No one can say with a straight face that if you don't cut him at birth it will need to be done later. BS. The overwhelming majority of all men in the world are uncut. The only ones you can reasonably safely bet are cut are: Muslims, Jews, and Americans!
 
Old 05-22-2008   #19 (permalink)
jacknapier is offline
Banned

AAARGH enough with the circumcision talk! Please leave! Why did I start this stupid thread!!!
 
Old 05-23-2008   #20 (permalink)
FrenuLes is offline
Banned

No doubt I would get my son circumcised before he leaves the hospital.
 
Old 05-23-2008   #21 (permalink)
petergroot is offline

Leave the kid to make up his own mind. What right have you, his mother or any person to decide to mutilate him?
 
Old 05-23-2008   #22 (permalink)
SteveHd is offline

Selected statements from medical governing boards:

[In chronological order]

Canadian Paediatric Society [1996]

Recommendation: Circumcision of newborns should not be routinely performed.

American Academy of Pediatrics [1999]

Existing scientific evidence demonstrates potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision; however, these data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision.

Royal Australasian College of Physicians [2004]

After extensive review of the literature the RACP reaffirms that there is no medical indication for routine neonatal circumcision.

[Bolding theirs]

That says a lot, doesn't it?
 
Old 05-23-2008   #23 (permalink)
jacknapier is offline
Banned

but i heard you have a higher chance to contract HIV
 
Old 05-23-2008   #24 (permalink)
DC_DEEP is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacknapier View Post
AAARGH enough with the circumcision talk! Please leave! Why did I start this stupid thread!!!
Interesting question. What's the answer?
 
Old 05-23-2008   #25 (permalink)
jacknapier is offline
Banned

I wanted to troll myself for a change.
 
Old 05-23-2008   #26 (permalink)
jacknapier is offline
Banned

Feels kinda good.
 
Old 05-23-2008   #27 (permalink)
SteveHd is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacknapier View Post
but i heard you have a higher chance to contract HIV
Are you intentionally disclosing that the African HIV/Circ studies were done to advocate infant [instead of adult] circumcision?
 
Old 05-23-2008   #28 (permalink)
josh762 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacknapier View Post
but its unhygeinic
It's only unclean when it doesn't get washed. If a man doesn't wash his penis if he is not cut then he isn't gonna wash it if he is cut. And he probably won't clean his fingernails or the crack of his ass. That's what you call a loser.
 
Old 05-23-2008   #29 (permalink)
herkimer snow is offline

It's too bad a person who doesn't have a penis or a foreskin is the one making the decision about an unnecessary operation. It's not about hygiene or what might happen sometime in the future. It's about good sex. And that's all. It's better with a foreskin. Leave the kid alone!
 
Old 05-23-2008   #30 (permalink)
g32js is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by herkimer snow View Post
It's too bad a person who doesn't have a penis or a foreskin is the one making the decision about an unnecessary operation. It's not about hygiene or what might happen sometime in the future. It's about good sex. And that's all. It's better with a foreskin. Leave the kid alone!
an your full of it, bull crap if its better sex with a foreskin, i know diffrent i had uncut and cut and its way better sex when the guy is cut, sure you an few others wont agree here but thats ok with me i still know the better man in bed and hes cut,
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7