LPSG.ORG

Edwards finally endorses someone...

McCain in '08!

is part of a discussion in the Et Cetera, Et Cetera forum that includes topics on Off-topic postings, current events, rants and raves....


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Et Cetera, Et Cetera

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-15-2008   #31 (permalink)
jacknapier is offline
Banned

McCain in '08!
 
Old 05-15-2008   #32 (permalink)
faceking is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by jack99821 View Post
...Senator Barack Obama.

So much for her "coalition" of workers and lower-middle-class whites.


Is the last logical end point for the Clinton camp?

Clinton's base in West Virginia reveres John Edwards so much that he won 7% of the vote in the primary. How many others would've voted for him had he not suspended his campaign?

Now the populist is passing the torch to Obama. This flies directly in the face of some of the claims coming out of her campaign in recent weeks.

The question now, of course, is whether this will dispel the fears of some of the... ah... let's say less open minded folks in West Virginia and elsewhere who still think Barack was sworn in on the Qu'ran. I'm thinking this will be the hammer to crack their shell of intolerance (also known as the "la la la I'm not listening" shell). It also may serve as a nice wake-up call that all of her campaigning means next to nothing at this point.

I'm not upset that Clinton is still running. She's totally within her rights. I am upset that her camp is misrepresenting the facts and ignoring the math so people will donate and help cover their $20mil debt. The fact that people feel passionately about this campaign and are willing to donate their hard-earned cash to political candidates is fantastic. It shouldn't be exploited. Let them donate to, say, the party itself. Tag the money for the general and hand it to the nominee. Don't give them false ideas that a few more ads will give Hillary a fighting chance. Her only hope are the superdelegates, and TV ads generally don't affect their decisions.
Why do these jackasses wait, in this hierarchal fashion??????

You were running for president... dipshit... so you MUST have SOME acumen and insight... what changed over the last two months Mr Edwards, that you couldn't pitch your sponsorship months ago. You were just running for president... we need ppl that can think a littttttttttttttttttttttle faster than that. And if you are going the Veep ticket... you mean you just NOW figured your allegiance to Obama?

What... are we know just waiting for the big fraud that is Al Gore... and is that the death-knell? Gore knew months ago.

What is all this hierarchal posturizing for... both parties do it, and I dont' get it... for the sake of momentum? Is it who shows up to the red carpet last is the coolest?

I hope Gore goes for Obama, and Hillary says f-you to the Democrat Party, and gives a little payback for everyone fucking her, and runs as an independent. I'll donate some kizzow if she needs it then.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #33 (permalink)
Trinity is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by Industrialsize View Post
The TRIBE has spoken, it's time for Hillary to go. I resent the implication that Obama is somehow stealing the election. Yes there are many Americans who would like to see Hillary as president. The fact is that there are MORE who want to see Obama as president. That's why she is losing by EVERY metric. By calling Obama an "empty suit", you insult the intelligence of all of us who worked and voted for him. It's time for you and your diatribes to go "quietly into the night"<
Obama isn't the nominee...he's not even the presumptive nominee. As it stands, Sen. Clinton shouldn't "step aside" if he gets the title presumptive nominee. With the closeness of this race, with a lead of less than 2% Obama should have to win it. Win it with complete validity...that means 50 states counted and all votes cast at the convention.

Currently, Clinton leads in the popular vote. If you are insulted then perhaps you should choose another candidate. I know you wish Hillary Clinton and her supporters would give up but West Virginia has spoken. And millions of other Americans feel the same. Obama has a problem. Ignoring it is a mistake for the Democratic Party and everybody who wants to see the Bush policy come to an end.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #34 (permalink)
StapledShut is offline

RealClearPolitics - 2008 Elections - Democratic Vote Count

Obama is winning the popular vote nationwide, and he has been for some time now. The fact that Hillary is still fighting would be admirable if it wasn't for the fact that the election is in less than six months and she's still more focused on putting down her opponent for the nomination rather than her party's opponent for the Presidency. Her perseverance isn't quite as much of a problem as her expression thereof, since it's only serving to hurt her party, the massive circulation of negative energy causing people to default to McCain. Now, if she could focus on building herself up in a relevant manner while putting McCain down, rather than shifting her image and belittling Obama, we would be deciding who's the stronger arm in the united front against McCain. That would be the more admirable way to stay in the race.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #35 (permalink)
Industrialsize is online now

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trinity View Post
Obama isn't the nominee...he's not even the presumptive nominee. As it stands, Sen. Clinton shouldn't "step aside" if he gets the title presumptive nominee. With the closeness of this race, with a lead of less than 2% Obama should have to win it. Win it with complete validity...that means 50 states counted and all votes cast at the convention.

Currently, Clinton leads in the popular vote. If you are insulted then perhaps you should choose another candidate. I know you wish Hillary Clinton and her supporters would give up but West Virginia has spoken. And millions of other Americans feel the same. Obama has a problem. Ignoring it is a mistake for the Democratic Party and everybody who wants to see the Bush policy come to an end.
She is only winning the popular vote ONE WAY. If you throw out the caucus resluts AND award him ZERO votes for Michigan. A 2 year old can see how many holes that theory has. Go ahead and seat Florida AND Michigan as voted AND include the cauceses and he still maintains a lead in the popular vote and an INSURMOUNTABLE lead in delegates. You better start therapy now before the Denver convention, you are going to be mightily disappointed. And Obama will win the nomination because he won it by EVERY measure. You might notice Senator Clinton's speeches of the past few days. Even SHE doesn't say I'm winning the popular vote. She says, More people have voted for me. A BIG DIFFERENCE because it awards Obama ZERO votes from Michigan. And please don't reply that "He took his name off of Michigan's ballot voluntarily. The entire world knows that argument doesn't hold water. Have you noticed since West Virginia, Obama has amassed 32 superdelegates, the endorsemnet of Edwards, the United Steel Workers and NARAL. Hillary has amassed a net of 1.5 superdelegates. Notice a trend??? The superdelegates ARE looking at both candidates and making up their minds who would be better for the party AND better in the GE. Their overwhelming choice has been OBAMA. I predict the race will END shortly before or after Oregon and Kentucky.
You might also listen to Hillary's speeched TODAY:

Sounding less like a campaign?

Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:04 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, Clinton, Ron Allen


From NBC's Ron Allen
Did we get off the bus at the wrong stop? Did something happen we didn't hear about as we flew a couple of hours from D.C. to South Dakota?
We're on the campaign trail with Sen. Clinton, but you really have to listen very closely here at the Jones family farm in Aberdeen to hear any hint she's fighting for the Democratic nomination.

Maybe we're getting a bit ahead of things, maybe its just the place and time, maybe its that we're all looking for clues about her intentions, but the vibe feels different.

Clinton began her remarks talking about how great it is that South Dakota is going to vote, and how important those votes will be. But what followed was a detailed talk about farming and rural issues, not why she's still in the race, nor much of her usual stump speech.
No mention of the delegate math, recent endorsements in the news, nor how much "we need a fighter" in the White House.
Clinton talked a lot about why she supports the Farm Bill that just passed the Congress and that President Bush has threatened to veto.
That's the "news" or theme for the day her press people highlighted. We've heard about the need to strength the safety net for small farmers, the need for disaster relief programs, mandatory country of origin labeling, and the "Farm to Fork" program Clinton started in New York. And by the way, there are 34,OOO family farms in New York, just like some of the farms here, Clinton explained, anticipating that most people in rural communities think of skyscrapers in New York, not apple orchards and dairy pastures.
So far, just one mention of Barack Obama. It was the standard reminder that Clinton and Obama have "differences" over issues like health care, and whether everyone will have coverage.
Clinton also criticized John McCain and President Bush because of their opposition to the farm bill, the only mention of McCain other than something like the usual lines about how he's a friend, a good man, but with the wrong ideas.

Mostly, it's a beautiful sunny afternoon here on the farm, perfect day for a nice chat with some voters. There's a relatively small crowd of perhaps a couple hundred people. No one is waving "Hillary" signs and cheering Clinton on, but clearly they're here to support her. And based on the surroundings many in the crowd probably had to drive quite a ways to get here. The energy level is low -- comfortably so. And we sure have learned a bit about issues affecting farmers, rural communities and Clinton's very detailed plans to address those concerns.

Every campaign stop isn't a big rally. And as I said, we're all looking for hints that may, in fact, just turn into illusions. Yesterday, the campaign made it clear she will compete in all the remaining primaries, and fight to seat the delegations from Florida and Michigan -- and fight for the nomination.

A man in the crowd just asked Clinton a question, and offered to be her vice president. She asked for his resume. Everyone was quite amused. Not exactly the question many of us have for Clinton about the Democratic Party's VP slot, but that was perhaps one of the most "campaign-like" sounding moments we've heard on the trail so far in South Dakota.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #36 (permalink)
Zoe73 is offline

not to mention counting Puerto Rico toward a popular vote primary... for an argument about electability in a general election - where Puerto Rico isn't allowed to vote in a general election.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #37 (permalink)
invisibleman is offline

I think that I am a bit tired of the Bush political "experience". If Hillary gets the Presidency...I am happy for her. If Obama gets the Presidency...I am happy for him.

I would like if both worked together. I think that would be a great team. A woman and a black guy. A first for America.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #38 (permalink)
Zoe73 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Industrialsize View Post
The TRIBE has spoken, it's time for Hillary to go. I resent the implication that Obama is somehow stealing the election. Yes there are many Americans who would like to see Hillary as president. The fact is that there are MORE who want to see Obama as president. That's why she is losing by EVERY metric. By calling Obama an "empty suit", you insult the intelligence of all of us who worked and voted for him. It's time for you and your diatribes to go "quietly into the night"<
or at a minimum - put your money where your mouth is and contribute to her campaign to make the case that she can win - she's only 20million in debt. Those of you that want her to win so badly...why aren't you contributing to her campaign?
 
Old 05-15-2008   #39 (permalink)
Trinity is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by Industrialsize View Post
She is only winning the popular vote ONE WAY.
Exactly
 
Old 05-15-2008   #40 (permalink)
sargon20 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by StapledShut View Post
I'd prefer Obama/Edwards over Obama/Clinton, as well. Clinton is too much of a power-hungry control freak to be trusted to play second fiddle without a knife behind her back.
Maybe she's thinking that if she can just get her pumps in the door she's in. If she uses Cheney as a model, he ran the country from the Vice-Presidents residence up the road.
 
Old 05-15-2008   #41 (permalink)
transformer_99 is offline

Edwards has simply made his power play at this stage, looking to be VP. He did it with Kerry, he was sitting on the fencepost this time for either Obama or Clinton. It would have been nice if either had secured the nomination by now, but enough has swayed over to Obama's side to get him to commit. And he's going to do it now before it's totally too late and it even looks more like the band wagoning that he's pulling.

It's too evident there is no way Obama/Clinton as the ticket can happen, not with the way this has gone. So that leaves Edwards, the legitimate 3rd place in this race and Kerry's former running mate. I doubt he has anything to lose at this stage ?
 
Old 05-15-2008   #42 (permalink)
Skull Mason is offline

Laverne n Shirley '08
 
Old 05-15-2008   #43 (permalink)
Trinity is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skull Mason View Post
Laverne n Shirley '08
Elaine Brown was running for President 2008 as the Green Party candidate Skull...that should have made you happy .
 
Old 05-15-2008   #44 (permalink)
VinylBoy is online now

Oy vey. All Obama has to do is breathe air with a smile, and all of his extreme supporters jump up and down as if Jesus turned a basin of toilet water into a bottle of Grey Goose.

The contest is not over. Even if Clinton can't get enough delegates, if she wins big in the final states then Obama won't have enough either. Then it goes to the convention, and seeing whether or not all of those "pledged delegates" stick to their guns. It's not as if many have been flip flopping between Obama & Clinton to begin with. What makes everyone think that if they go for Obama that they're going to stick with him, or vice versa? The difference bewteen the two canididates is a mere 2%. Since when does ANYONE quit a contest when they're that close? That's like a football team demanding their opponents to quit 5 minutes into the fourth quarter just because they're behind by a touchdown. Let's just wait until the game is REALLY over before we start predicting it?
 
Old 05-15-2008   #45 (permalink)
Domisoldo is offline

Edwards-Obama 2017!
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7