LPSG.ORG

Is wise to avoid woman then ?

I know the socio-economic income scale of gay males on the whole are higher than straight people. They must be doing something right. They also tend to have better livingrooms.

is part of a discussion in the Et Cetera, Et Cetera forum that includes topics on Off-topic postings, current events, rants and raves....

Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Et Cetera, Et Cetera

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-13-2008   #16 (permalink)
Mademoiselle Rouge is offline

I know the socio-economic income scale of gay males on the whole are higher than straight people. They must be doing something right. They also tend to have better livingrooms.
 
Old 05-13-2008   #17 (permalink)
Phil Ayesho is offline

Approximately 10% of geniuses are gay.
Same as all other aspects of human culture.

I can list you hundreds of straight men far more influential in world history who were not gay...


Also... Leonardo was almost certainly not gay... he was, as were most men of his class and era, bisexual.

The apprenticeship system in Europe during the renaissance would be considered child abuse in today's world.

Parents BOUGHT their kids apprenticeships with tradesmen where the child would go and live with the tradesman... the tradesman would pay their keep and teach them their craft, and the kid would be essentially a bonded servant to the tradesman.

In a large percentage of these situations... the apprentice ended up sexually servicing their master.

These apprentices eventually grew up, started their own shops, and took on their own apprentices and repeated the cycle of sexual abuse.

Leonardo, Donatello, Raphael... all were conditioned as children to have sex with boys and young men.


Of the great artists of that era, only Michelangelo can be proven to be definitively gay... an orientation that shows up in his disinterest and poor skill at female figurative sculpture... he wrote about striving all his life to overcome his "un-natural and sinful" urges.

Keep in mind that European cultrue of the time was heavily influenced by Roman culture,in which casual sex between men, and especially between men and boys, was considered pretty normal.


In any human culture where access to women is very tightly controlled... bisexual behavior among the men will become the norm.

Its often not spoken of... but its happening.
 
Old 05-13-2008   #18 (permalink)
HungDavid is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Ayesho View Post
Approximately 10% of geniuses are gay.
Same as all other aspects of human culture.

I can list you hundreds of straight men far more influential in world history who were not gay...


Also... Leonardo was almost certainly not gay... he was, as were most men of his class and era, bisexual.

The apprenticeship system in Europe during the renaissance would be considered child abuse in today's world.

Parents BOUGHT their kids apprenticeships with tradesmen where the child would go and live with the tradesman... the tradesman would pay their keep and teach them their craft, and the kid would be essentially a bonded servant to the tradesman.

In a large percentage of these situations... the apprentice ended up sexually servicing their master.

These apprentices eventually grew up, started their own shops, and took on their own apprentices and repeated the cycle of sexual abuse.

Leonardo, Donatello, Raphael... all were conditioned as children to have sex with boys and young men.


Of the great artists of that era, only Michelangelo can be proven to be definitively gay... an orientation that shows up in his disinterest and poor skill at female figurative sculpture... he wrote about striving all his life to overcome his "un-natural and sinful" urges.

Keep in mind that European cultrue of the time was heavily influenced by Roman culture,in which casual sex between men, and especially between men and boys, was considered pretty normal.


In any human culture where access to women is very tightly controlled... bisexual behavior among the men will become the norm.

Its often not spoken of... but its happening.
I'm not saying that most genuises were gay but the list of gay genuises is very big .
 
Old 05-13-2008   #19 (permalink)
HungDavid is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mademoiselle Rouge View Post
I know the socio-economic income scale of gay males on the whole are higher than straight people. They must be doing something right. They also tend to have better livingrooms.
Yes gays usually have better livingrooms because of their income and because they are on average very creative and know better about decoration.
 
Old 05-13-2008   #20 (permalink)
Catchoftheday is online now


 
Old 05-13-2008   #21 (permalink)
faceking is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by HungDavid View Post
The fact that many of the world history genuises were gay is very interesting . I'm not saying that a correlation of being gay and intelligence exists or that gays are more intelligent on average .
Gays actually have a very creative minds . It seems that Leonardo Da Vinci and many others genuises realize that woman are too problematic .

To the woman on this site please not take this thread very seriously . I don't mean to attack girls but to comment on one curious fact.
hmmm, so which particular genii have openly said they were guy (vs. historian surmising), and by gay do mean "dabble'd-thru-bisexuality" or straight-on fully gay.
 
Old 05-13-2008   #22 (permalink)
HungDavid is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by faceking View Post
hmmm, so which particular genii have openly said they were guy (vs. historian surmising), and by gay do mean "dabble'd-thru-bisexuality" or straight-on fully gay.
Do you own homework search about famous genuises and famous gays.
I'm talking about fully gays .
 
Old 05-13-2008   #23 (permalink)
faceking is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by HungDavid View Post
Do you own homework search about famous genuises and famous gays.
I'm talking about fully gays .
No, actually, I have much better things to do.... but if/when someone is going to throw out blatant ad-hominem (yes, No Strings, errr Mercurial... or the pale plain redhead... can never get you two straight... that's for you) claims... be prepared to back it up... or come back and claim you were merely generalizing, and to what degree thereof (again for you, whichever one you are, maybe both).
 
Old 05-13-2008   #24 (permalink)
Gillette is offline
Moderator

Quote:
Originally Posted by faceking View Post
and by gay do mean "dabble'd-thru-bisexuality" or straight-on fully gay.
I wonder how 100% gay men take to it being referred to as "straight " on?

Quote:
Originally Posted by faceking View Post
No, actually, I have much better things to do.... but if/when someone is going to throw out blatant ad-hominem (yes, No Strings, errr Mercurial... or the pale plain redhead... can never get you two straight... that's for you) claims... be prepared to back it up... or come back and claim you were merely generalizing, and to what degree thereof (again for you, whichever one you are, maybe both).
Since neither of them have participated in this thread it seems rather petulant of you to bring them up here.
 
Old 05-13-2008   #25 (permalink)
Oh_Yeah is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mademoiselle Rouge View Post
I know the socio-economic income scale of gay males on the whole are higher than straight people. They must be doing something right. They also tend to have better livingrooms.
my living room is awesome. i decorated my entire apartment myself, when the property sold the owners brought the potential buyers through our place about 11 times until the property finally sold.

work it out!
 
Old 05-13-2008   #26 (permalink)
snoozan is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by faceking View Post
No, actually, I have much better things to do.... but if/when someone is going to throw out blatant ad-hominem (yes, No Strings, errr Mercurial... or the pale plain redhead... can never get you two straight... that's for you) claims... be prepared to back it up... or come back and claim you were merely generalizing, and to what degree thereof (again for you, whichever one you are, maybe both).
I'd rather represent myself online as a pale, plain redhead than a chubby body shot and cum-splattered $2 mirrors from KMart.
 
Old 05-13-2008   #27 (permalink)
THEDUDEofDestiny is offline

i think it is safe to say most of us, whether straight or gay, are not smart enough to be remembered as geniuses of history. so if we are straight we might as well fuck a lot of women.
 
Old 05-14-2008   #28 (permalink)
ManlyBanisters is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by THEDUDEofDestiny View Post
i think it is safe to say most of us, whether straight or gay, are not smart enough to be remembered as geniuses of history. so if we are straight we might as well fuck a lot of women.
What about straight women? Should they fuck a lot of women too?

 
Old 05-14-2008   #29 (permalink)
krisse is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManlyBanisters View Post
What about straight women? Should they fuck a lot of women too?




As long as I'm invited
 
Old 05-14-2008   #30 (permalink)
Catchoftheday is online now

Quote:
Originally Posted by ManlyBanisters View Post
What about straight women? Should they fuck a lot of women too?

Wood be rude not to ...I'm a woman BTW
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Latest Threads
Cumming to America
14 Minutes Ago by WeaponX
Thom Barron
16 Minutes Ago by Deno
18 yr old with a...
22 Minutes Ago by Refresh7

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7