05-12-2008
|
#1 (permalink)
| | | Body characteristics of large sized Hi everyone,
I always wondered how is possible to know how to realize you're in front of a well endowed guy. This is because I have two friends who always get involved with big dicked guys (at least that's what they say, but I have witnessed that was true on more than one time ;-) ) , and none of them have never wanted to tell about what they see in a man to say "My Godness, this is a huuuuuuge one!"
Some people say African-American men is commonly well endowed, but apart from that, some people say "look at the length of his fingers", some say "look at the size of his shoes", but I don't think these are rules, as I have known boyfriends of my friends of every size of shoes or size of their hands and that gives me no clue.
What do you think? | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#2 (permalink)
| | | well unless they are purposely showing their package or whip it out...there's really no way to tell. Quite honestly....in my experience short stocky white guys have been the biggest and thickest. It's the lil' guys that will suprise ya' :) | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#3 (permalink)
| | | I guess large sized cocks belong to the most naturally athletic people. It's not easy to tell whos the most naturally athletic person but its the best way. | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#4 (permalink)
| | | They tend to leave the shower door open. | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#5 (permalink)
| | | To be honest, length is not determinable by physical features, but girth is. I'll tell you what I notice that usually means "big one." Broad features. Not to be confused with "big hands, big feet good lord, big meat." If the guy's a thick necked and looks like he could cut a tree down with his teeth; chances are he's got a nice, thick slab between his legs.
The major thing that I look for is if the guy's got thick fingers. Thick fingers have, for me, been a 98% accurate sign that the guy's got a thick one.
Like I said, though. It may not be a long one, but it'll damn sure hit all the right spots. | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#6 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by yngjock20
The major thing that I look for is if the guy's got thick fingers. Thick fingers have, for me, been a 98% accurate sign that the guy's got a thick one.
Like I said, though. It may not be a long one, but it'll damn sure hit all the right spots. | That's probably the most accurate basis to predict someones size.
Big feet/big hands etc is a load of shit anyway because I got very big feet/hands n all that but I'm only 6.5 long. But yeah I am a pretty wide person with thick fingers (I call my hands 'panda hands' lol) And I do have a thick one..shame it aint very long :( | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#8 (permalink)
| | | LOL! I just love you nj! She's so right guys. | | | |
| |
05-12-2008
|
#10 (permalink)
| | | I have heard that a wide chin is an indication of high testosterone levels (presumably at some early stage, while still growing). I do get the impression that hung guys are more likely to have a wide chin, though it's far from infallible. | | | |
| |
05-13-2008
|
#11 (permalink)
| | | All of the physical features, other than the cock itself, can NOT be used to measure how big a guy's cock is.
I'm 5'4", with tiny feet, tiny hands, tiny wrists, and short fingers. Despite this, I have an above average dick (or, according to what people online have told me, a rather big cock; I've measured only 7 inches, even though people on this site have accused me of being longer).
I do have a rather low voice, and a really big head (the one above the shoulders), but I seriously doubt those are good ways to tell a man's size.
Seriously, if I'm anything to go by, you can't rely on body characteristics to judge a man's size. | | | |
| |
05-13-2008
|
#12 (permalink)
| | | Notice the big bulge in his pants. | | | |
| |
05-13-2008
|
#13 (permalink)
| | | Well, even not having a big bulge in his pants is not a clue, I am sure, as I had a boyfriend who looked below average when his penis was soft, but when erected he had (and I think he still has :-) ) an OMG size, despite it wasn't thick, it was long indeed (I guess 8 inches, but never measured it). | | | |
| |
05-13-2008
|
#14 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Darpon All of the physical features, other than the cock itself, can NOT be used to measure how big a guy's cock is.
I'm 5'4", with tiny feet, tiny hands, tiny wrists, and short fingers. Despite this, I have an above average dick (or, according to what people online have told me, a rather big cock; I've measured only 7 inches, even though people on this site have accused me of being longer).
I do have a rather low voice, and a really big head (the one above the shoulders), but I seriously doubt those are good ways to tell a man's size.
Seriously, if I'm anything to go by, you can't rely on body characteristics to judge a man's size. | I agree. There is no correlation between penis size and other features of the body.
I have been with big, broad, football/hockey types (including thick necks and huge, sausage fingers) with smallish to tiny dicks, and thin, short guys packing monsters.
I, myself, am short (5'6) and broad-chested (40"), slim-hipped (28" waist) and have no ass. But my legs are big and my feet Hobbit-like (10.5 EEE: nearly square  ). If I were a dog, I'd be a Jack Russell/St Bernard/Greyhound mix.
Rock hard, throbbing and drooling I measure just under 8". | | | |
| |
05-13-2008
|
#15 (permalink)
| | | if you're deepthroathing the cock and its already touching the back of your throat...and still see shaft and balls ahead of you ...its big...thats how you can tell :) | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |