LPSG.ORG

May I say that this election exhausts me?

Originally Posted by snoozan why did you feel the need to post this and PM me the exact same thing? He might have been worried that you're monopolizing the state of douchebaggery...? Kudos on your

is part of a discussion in the Et Cetera, Et Cetera forum that includes topics on Off-topic postings, current events, rants and raves....


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Et Cetera, Et Cetera

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2008   #31 (permalink)
HazelGod is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by snoozan View Post
why did you feel the need to post this and PM me the exact same thing?
He might have been worried that you're monopolizing the state of douchebaggery...?

Kudos on your earlier post on this thread...took the words right from my mouth.
Which means I get to stuff something in yours, right?
 
Old 05-09-2008   #32 (permalink)
snoozan is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Strings View Post
To paraphrase one of my earlier posts: people need to shut the fuck up and simply vote for who they believe is the best candidate for running their country of residence. That's all there is to it.
you don't think dialogue-- even arguments and senseless ranting sometimes-- isn't a good thing? is that how you think important decisions should be made-- with no discussion? the reason why this election is all over everywhere is because it's important to people because the US is in the middle of costly a war where people are getting injured and dying every day and our economy is trashed. this election should be on everyone's minds, because we have serious problems in the US. we need to have a national dialogue on where the US is heading because it directly affects our quality of life. the unwillingness to openly discuss and exchange ideas combined with the apathy of our young people is how our country elected george bush and why the religious right has dominated US politics for so many years.
 
Old 05-09-2008   #33 (permalink)
marleyisalegend is offline

More Election I Say!!!! Keep Talking About It!!!!
 
Old 05-09-2008   #34 (permalink)
javyn is offline

I think the democrats are going to be regretting the whole recount fiasco with Bush, because you know Hillary already has her army of lawyers ready for that when she loses the primary. Only this time though, I really do think she'll succeed in stealing it away from Obama over some technicality.
 
Old 05-09-2008   #35 (permalink)
No_Strings is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by snoozan View Post
you don't think dialogue-- even arguments and senseless ranting sometimes-- isn't a good thing? is that how you think important decisions should be made-- with no discussion? the reason why this election is all over everywhere is because it's important to people because the US is in the middle of costly a war where people are getting injured and dying every day and our economy is trashed. this election should be on everyone's minds, because we have serious problems in the US. we need to have a national dialogue on where the US is heading because it directly affects our quality of life. the unwillingness to openly discuss and exchange ideas combined with the apathy of our young people is how our country elected george bush and why the religious right has dominated US politics for so many years.
I was generalising, but my problem is more to do with the type of dialogue.
There are some good discussions and debates going but unfortunately they seem to a vast minority. The focus so often seems to be on what's negative about the other party, rather than what's positive about ones' own party.
If we move the analogy from politics to friendship, then people who try and find the flaws in others for them to look down upon so they themselves feel better, usually don't have many friends at all. That's precisely what I see from all political camps. As notorious as political mud-slinging can be, I've always found supporters to partake in much more embarassing behaviour than the administration they're supposedly supporting. (Though usually having an opposite affect than what they intend.)

Case in point:

Obama LOSES Another BIG State.
Clinton must win 70 percent of remaining pledged delegates to match Obama
The Obama "has won more states" argument doesn't fly, or the has more delegates etc
Obama comment re guns and religion
Obama & American Idol
SICK of the Obama-Preacher write off excuses
Sick of the Obama Godlike bandwagon
Hey Trinity...remember your gloating about Wright and Obama?
Obama: the candidate of change!
Little girl in "3:00 AM" ad is an Obama supporter
Barack Hussein Obama
http://www.lpsg.org/80175-obama-took...-michigan.html
Obama Blows His Nose
Obama really shows his inexperience
Hillary, Hillary, Hillary... what you still doin' 'round girl?
Hillary Clinton cares nothing for democracy
Hillary wins 6 delegate votes!!!!
Hillary Lies On Youtube
Wonder if Ann Coulter is still going to campaign for Hillary?
Would you punch Hillary in the face?
Is this how HILLARY intends to unite the country?
Heil Hillary!!!
I just got a call from Hillary Clinton..


These are all threads made about candidate/party A, created by supporters for candidate/party B. They do nothing but attack the opposition, and consequently damage their own candidate. None intended to be reasonable or respectable debates. (Off the top of my head whilst searching LPSG, that's around 65-80% of all threads with "Obama" or "Hillary" in the title.)
While some do contain within them reasonable discussion for brief periods, they have unfortunately been against the intention of those threads.

It's embarrassing behaviour, most often fueled by fear of the opponent's strength or the fear of their own [candidates'] weakness. It often comes accompanied with a narrow-minded anger that not eveyrone is of the same opinion, too. If someone's opinion will not be swayed by their own researching and reading of each candidates' policies and reputation, then chances are that petty forum fueds won't either.



On a personal note, if I see people behaving in this way who are in favour of a candidate that I am, it can sometimes cause me to rethink my allegiance; if by my endorsing a candidate it makes me rub shoulders with those kind of people it's not something I want to be a part of.
Look what happened to Ron Pauls' momentum after the whole neo-nazi/white power debacle(whether it was 'true' or not).
If I had a vote and was to choose the lesser of evils (which an election always is) it would probably be Obama; I don't like Hillary's view on healthcare. I don't like admitting that around here with the behaviour of other pro-Obama members, though - it makes me ashamed to be associated with them in any way.
 
Old 05-09-2008   #36 (permalink)
snoozan is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Strings View Post
I was generalising, but my problem is more to do with the type of dialogue. {snip}
That was a wonderful post, and I agree with it 100%. But it's not what you said in the post to which I was referring.
 
Old 05-09-2008   #37 (permalink)
marleyisalegend is offline

thankyou no strins for a WONDERFUL assessment about politics on this site. i'd rather no one talk about the election if it's all going to be: obama sucks cuz.... hillary's a dumb bitch cuz.... republicans are the devil cuz....
 
Old 05-09-2008   #38 (permalink)
VinylBoy is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Strings View Post
These are all threads made about candidate/party A, created by supporters for candidate/party B. They do nothing but attack the opposition, and consequently damage their own candidate. None intended to be reasonable or respectable debates. (Off the top of my head whilst searching LPSG, that's around 65-80% of all threads with "Obama" or "Hillary" in the title.)
While some do contain within them reasonable discussion for brief periods, they have unfortunately been against the intention of those threads.

It's embarrassing behaviour, most often fueled by fear of the opponent's strength or the fear of their own [candidates'] weakness. It often comes accompanied with a narrow-minded anger that not eveyrone is of the same opinion, too. If someone's opinion will not be swayed by their own researching and reading of each candidates' policies and reputation, then chances are that petty forum fueds won't either.
No Strings, I applaud you.

You may want to post this on the recently regurgitated "Hillary Cares Nothing About Democracy" thread before it somehow sucks the life out of this board again.
 
Old 05-09-2008   #39 (permalink)
naughty is offline

Ding, Ding, Ding!

No Strings is the winnah by unanimous vote. THANK YOU! You said it better than I could ever have. THAT IS WHAT MAKES ME FEEL EXHAUSTED!
 
Old 05-09-2008   #40 (permalink)
marleyisalegend is offline

and a member of the site got mad at us for being sick of this nonsense
 
Old 05-09-2008   #41 (permalink)
snoozan is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by marleyisalegend View Post
and a member of the site got mad at us for being sick of this nonsense
oh get over it.
 
Old 05-09-2008   #42 (permalink)
marleyisalegend is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by snoozan View Post
oh get over it.
then you get over the harassment that caused you to start a whole nother thread about it.

hypocrisy live in living color people
 
Old 05-09-2008   #43 (permalink)
playainda336 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by StapledShut View Post
And every discussion in this board somehow turns into a barack/hillary discussion.
You said it.

Lol...I'm still laughing at the fact that I made it on someone's ignore list over a political debate that's going to hold absolutely no merit after November.

What a hoser...
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Strings View Post
Case in point:

Clinton must win 70 percent of remaining pledged delegates to match Obama

These are all threads made about candidate/party A, created by supporters for candidate/party B. They do nothing but attack the opposition, and consequently damage their own candidate. None intended to be reasonable or respectable debates. (Off the top of my head whilst searching LPSG, that's around 65-80% of all threads with "Obama" or "Hillary" in the title.)
OBJECTION!

(Pardon me...I do that all in good fun, and it's more of "you have to be in" joke to get, so I apologize...)

I didn't start that thread to attack Hillary Clinton. I stated a hard fact and opened up the floor for discussion.

And just to clarify...the hard fact was not what CNN posted because I didn't do the math to verify it myself. The hard fact was that CNN posted it.
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7