Quote:
Originally Posted by ManlyBanisters Of course there is the odd infamous incident where metric and imperial being used side by side has caused problems - but I wouldn't suggest that the metric system is 'more intelligent' than imperial. That makes about as much sense as saying the euro is 'more intelligent' than the Yen. Ridiculous. In fact you'd have an easier time arguing that imperial is more intelligent than a base 10 system because you have to remember more things and work in more than one base. |
I agree, but I think the truth is a little more human than the relative merits of each system. On that issue, I may address some of Phil's ... err ... facts later. But the UK faced and is still facing the very same resistance. It's perfectly understandable, but it's no more logical than US resistance and surely no less deeply felt by many.
For all the blather about why Imperial is better, or vice versa the posters who have been the most honest are those reacting angrily as if they're somehow under 'attack'. It's a needless reaction given the subject but it comes closer to the true reason; broadly speaking
people don't like change, and many Americans (as they have demonstrated) don't react well when their comfort zone is threatened - 'top' dogs don't see a need to learn new tricks.
Come on peeps, for many of you it's as simple as not wanting to give up a system you're comfortable with - there's no shame in that but at least have the spine to admit it, instead of creating all these convoluted 'reasons' why imperial is 'better' - it's simply
not. The UK has been there and done that - it's not so bad once you re-adjust, really very painless. Besides, there's no need to give up your 'cups', just shift the emphasis - I do it all the time.
I say this tongue in cheek for the most part, because I really couldn't give a tinker's cuss
what system the US uses - my only gripe being that much of the reasoning
against it (besides the cost) is IMO and with all due respect,
bollocks.
