05-06-2008
|
#1 (permalink)
| | | what you consider big? hey, i'm in my mid-20s and i never thought about my cock being big until i found this website by mistake
now it has me thinking, i never really measured it until now, but it's about 7 1/4" long if i measure from the top. is that average or just a little above avg?
i think it's decent but i don't think im "hung". just curious, that's all. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#2 (permalink)
| | | It all depends on the person. Some will say it's hung, others used to seeing bigger won't. You also have to factor in girth, it's the whole package.
I've been told I'm hung many a time on here, and sometimes just above average. But I think off of here, around people not used to seein a penis that size, as it is big, they will definitely say it's hung-worthy. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#3 (permalink)
| | | i'm a little tall, about 6' 1". 170lbs and 16% bodyfat to be technical.
ok, i will try to take girth measurement. it would help if someone came over and gave me a bj. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#4 (permalink)
| | | IF MEASURED PROPERLY, most guys, if honest, have 5.5 inches or so. A true 7 is large. Eight is extremely big and very rare. Nine or more is extreeeeemly rare. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#5 (permalink)
| | | You know this one comes up alot on this site. For me I think the true indication that you are larger than normal comes from your sexual partners. Now measurements aside if the girl/guy that is recieving what your giving finds you big/huge/massive whatever, then you have little to worry about. What is big to one, is not big to the others, but is massive to the next, it is all relative. So relax, enjoy, forget the statistics and the measuring tape, and have fun. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#6 (permalink)
| | | ok pic soon cuz i want to know now im very curious :D | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#7 (permalink)
| | | Well above average, I would say big but not huge | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#8 (permalink)
| | | 7 is pretty much where big starts. It's big enough for some, not big enough for others.
To me, visually, when taking into account proportion and erection level:
A 7 inch flaccid is freakishly huge, no matter how tall the person is. It's also very rare.
A 7 inch erection looks massive on skinny guys under around 5'8".
A 7 inch erection looks small on overweight guys or guys over 6'.
Again, since people around here need precision, that's MY VIEW. Not fucking fact. | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#9 (permalink)
| | | Im 7.1" so i just go by 7". I think being called "big" starts at 7. Maybe I have a bias :).
6-7 above avg.
7-8 big
8-9 quite large
9+ is huge
just my 2cents.
(but body type definately affects ones perception of size too) | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#10 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by SyddyKitty 7 is pretty much where big starts. | The way I see it, it's kinda like Mr.Hardcock said, it's the overall package.
If someone has less than 7, say, 6.5 to 6.75, but has a girth of 6", that's surely gotta be classed as big as well. You suggest that 7 is pretty much where big starts, but some people have 7 inches length with less than 6 girth. Girth is so important and in many ways seems overlooked and overshadowed by length when considering what is 'big'. Length seems to be the thing that most people qualify as big, yet forgetting to factor in the ass and pussy widening capability of cock fatness. Having said all that, I do realise there are some people where length really is more important than girth. But from what I've read, girth more often than not gets the higher vote.
However, if we're purely talking about length only and not girth at all, then yes, I would agree that 7 is probably the starting point. | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#11 (permalink)
| | | Yea, I did totally overlook girth. D= | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#12 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by SyddyKitty Yea, I did totally overlook girth. D= | Hehe
I remember seeing a couple of pictures someone posted of their cock, (on another site, not lpsg ), and it was pretty long, like maybe 7.5 or something. But hardly any girth. I mean, it actually was quite thin. And I remember women looking at this pic and saying "well it seems long but very skinny" as if to virtually dismiss it being a big cock. That was the first time I'd seen proof that length is not everything to a woman unless it has a certain amount of girth. Then I saw the same women looking at a not so lengthy cock but with girth ( not mine, someone elses) and all of a sudden they were like "mm, nice fat cock!". And finally, I've seen them looking at a fat cock and saying "it looks thick but it's not very long" suggesting they wanted both. Lol, so, all of these variables come into play. | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#13 (permalink)
| | | I'm 7x5, last I measured. That's the smallest you can get and still be called "big". Heck, I might not even be called big if it weren't for how big it looked on me (I'm only 5'4"), but yeah.
I wish I was thicker. | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#14 (permalink)
| | | So does my 6.5 by 6.5 get considered among you die hard minimum 7 inchers?
I sure hope so....or else i've wasted a lot of time when i could have been at the Average Penis Support Group. | | | |
| |
05-07-2008
|
#15 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Mademoiselle Rouge So does my 6.5 by 6.5 get considered among you die hard minimum 7 inchers?
I sure hope so....or else i've wasted a lot of time when i could have been at the Average Penis Support Group. | Feckin' hell thats thick. I'd consider it big. | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |