05-02-2008
|
#31 (permalink)
| | | I'm only 5'6, 125 lbs, and just shy of 8" length. 5.5 circum. Going to try jelqing to get to 8x6 | | | |
| |
05-02-2008
|
#32 (permalink)
| | | I have found it to be generally true of thin men, but of course it isn't universal. I also think overweight men lose some length...not sure how or now much exactly, but I've seen it on TV a few times. | | | |
| |
05-02-2008
|
#33 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by javyn I'm only 5'6", 125 lbs, and just shy of 8" length. 5.5 circum. Going to try jelqing to get to 8x6 | It's a wonder you don't fall over when you walk.  | | | |
| |
05-02-2008
|
#34 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by javyn I'm only 5'6, 125 lbs, and just shy of 8" length. 5.5 circum. Going to try jelqing to get to 8x6 | I'm pretty much exactly the same stats, but an inch taller  | | | |
| |
05-02-2008
|
#35 (permalink)
| | Banned | Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan the man Stop talking shite and get over yourself. Cock size is random and nothing to do with finger length, big noses, skinny guys, big feet or big hands. | Skinny guys tend to have thinner fatpads. That affects penis length showing. What's there to not realise? It's simple. The sad thing is no one comes to my defense on this very obvious point. I'm as right as I can be, there isn't even a debate when it comes to the fatpad. None. I really so give up here. If you can't understand that the fatpad must be correlated with penis length then I don't want to discuss that or anything else with you any further.
Also, I can provide a doctor study on index finger length correlating. I can provide doctor studies and database researches on height. I'm just stating what the findings are. I would say there is no correlation if there wasn't. You on the other hand, and many others, will say there isn't no matter what. I realise I'm viewed as the bad guy because I don't say correlations don't exist. I wish the findings were otherwise so I could be considered a hero too instead of a villain. | | | |
| |
05-02-2008
|
#36 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by superlarge Skinny guys tend to have thinner fatpads. That affects penis length showing. | Bingo. | | | |
| |
05-05-2008
|
#37 (permalink)
| | | I'm tall and lean (5'11 3/4" & 168 lbs.), blessed in the size department with a little over 9 1/4 ". | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#38 (permalink)
| | | I mismeasured, I am 8. So I am going to try to jelq my way to 9x6 Quote:
Originally Posted by jlr080281 I'm pretty much exactly the same stats, but an inch taller  | And what's this bullshit about the index finger correlation? Link me the study I'm interested...since my hands are smaller than a chick's. Oh and shoe size...give me a break. My dick size is bigger in inches than my shoe size. Yeah, that's great on one hand, but on the other hand it sucks, because it's a bitch trying to shop for some Allen Edmonds haha | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#39 (permalink)
| | | maybe the slim guys are putting the weight on in certain areas to make up for being slim lol | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#40 (permalink)
| | | Most cock sizes were determined like 20,000 years ago. Some people who survived back in the day had big dicks, most didn't, that's why the average penis size is what it is today.
Some have the genes for a big cock, other's don't, and then there's of course some anomalies who just happen to have a big one even though none of their ancestors had, or vice versa. So you could say it's pretty much random.
That's all it really comes down to, in my opinion.
But the theory that thinner men usually have bigger dicks is pretty dumb.
If you'd gather all the thin men, all the average sized men, all the bulky muscled men, all the fat men and all the short men in the whole world; and calculated each groups actual average penis length (screw the fatpads), I can guarantee you that you'd have almost the same numbers (give or take a few millimeters) for every group.
The only real difference here is perception. I'd say it's the relation between body size and structure and penis length that plays with your perception. Someone who's thin might appear to have a bigger one than someone who's fat, even though they might both actually have the same size when measured. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#41 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bigun79 maybe the slim guys are putting the weight on in certain areas to make up for being slim lol | I eat a lot of meat, being from Texas and all. I think all that protein goes to my dick.  | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#42 (permalink)
| | | Slimming down will definitely increase penis size!
There's a fat pad at the base of the penis. If a man is overweight, fat will build up there and it will end up making the penis look shorter. By losing weight, that fat pad is reduced, increasing the external length!
I actually had it happen to me! At 5'9" and 180lbs, I'm hardly "slim", but my penis got longer after I lost about 20 pounds a few years back. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#43 (permalink)
| | | Like some of threads about race and cock size, IMHO, this is the same. I've been with slim men that are large and some that are small. I do however agree with weight, extra fat in the crotch area can make a difference in cock size. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#44 (permalink)
| | Banned | It's so simply evident that the fatpad effects how much penis is showing, and thin guys will 'tend' to have thinner fatpads, that there shouldn't be any disagreement whatsoever on this and yet there is. The resistance to accepting any correlation in anything is astounding. I don't know what to say. Accept for nuff said. | | | |
| |
05-06-2008
|
#45 (permalink)
| | | I've seen a couple of thin tall men who had pretty small cocks. Most that i've seen who are thin and tall had above average size. | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |