Circumcision Scars

jason_els

Actually....... if you have any remaining inner foreskin, that can be stimulated to grow to cover the glans as it would a normal foreskin. The only thing all restored foreskins lack is the frenar band, and sometimes, the frenulum. Correct foreskin restoration balances the growth of inner and outer skin to create the new foreskin.

My strongest sensation comes from the remnant of the frenulum. I only have about half of it left though I suppose I should be thankful I have any left at all. I would like my glans to be more sensitive hence I've done restoration on and off with good results. Again, I'm lucky because I was left with about an inch of inner foreskin.

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt." -Bertrand Russell

The Greek Dude

The inner foreskin contains the Meissner's corpuscles, which actually run all the way to the base of the shaft. Many guys claim getting a high circumcision and leaving as much inner skin as possible actually exposes many more of these nerve endings and can actually make it more pleasure to stimulate the entire penis.


Like i've said, when you're a teenager or adult, you can have it done any way you'd like, whereas if you're a baby they usually give you the standard cut they've been trained to do, and this involves removing inner foreskin and the frenulum.

(Space for Rent. PM for details)

jackfrost123

I wasn't aware of that, so is the standard procedure for baby circs removing the frenulum? I thought they only removed inner foreskin and not the frenulum.

sugarandspice

I have never seen an uncircumcised penis that I thought looked horrible but I have seen a lot of train wreck circumcisions.
It really scared me when I saw what would have happened to my son if I had not kept insisting that his penis did not look normal.
The doctor finally pulled his skin back which had attached from his circumcision.
The doctors here are so stupid. They don't think it matters if someones sex organs are damaged.
It's like we should feel lucky to have them at all. Now doctors are trying to get women to have their labia removed to look pre-puberty .

Bright Blessings to all!
I love it when I hear your name
Got me sayin', baby, baby, baby, baby, baby,

I love women but I'm mostly straight. I'm not into cam exhibitionists(except to prove who you are).I do not cyber.

Alpensymphonie

It's my understanding that most RICs do not intentionally remove the fren-
ulum when they are performed. When the performer opts to do what we
call a tight cut (usually with one of the clamp devices), what might remain
of the frenulum will frequently fail to develop as the penis grows through
childhood and into puberty. Of course it is far easier to do a complete ex-
cision of the frenulum when the circumcision is done later in life.

SteveHd

I don't know if a "standard procedure" exists for baby circ's but I do know hospital circ's remove the frenulum, if it's present.

In many infants, the foreskin and glans are bonded together and the surgeon inserts a blunt instrument and rips the two apart. When that's done, the frenulum is ripped or torn out rather than cut.

Even for adult circ's, they usually remove the frenulum. It's very difficult to retain the frenulum if the frenar band is removed.

Routine infant circumcision -- a result of truth decay.

dxjnorto

Greek, your main malfunction is believing that cutting off erogenous tissue does not compromise sensation and function. Obviously the skin slides for a reason. And foreskin is about equal in size to one's palm. Try skinning your palm and see if that has a relationship to sensation. The answer to that is obvious, but for some reason people make the penis out to be different. Sure it has a nice shiny glans on the end - which is mistaken for the be all and end all of sensation. And leaving it exposed for several years can take the shine right off.

The body is not internally innervated for pleasure. Sure, you can feel gas pains inside, but sensation of pleasure is a function of skin. The penis is a blood filled chamber - its innervation is via several pathways - that's why anesthesia for genital cutting is not very effective and why cut guys can still experience orgasm, but like all body parts, sensation is mostly a function of skin.

The Meissner corpuscles you mention DO multiply. I think you've been reading circlist on this one. When someone puts on a hundred pounds, do you think they have no fine touch sensation on the skin that grows to cover their weight gain? There are more Meissner corpuscles on the lips, genitals, palms and fingertips, but Meissner corpuscles are not limited to those areas.

Caveat emptor. Be aware that some of the people on circlist would like nothing better than to see you cut down to size. Some would get off on it.

This is a good link for genuine penis research:

Foreskin :: Prepuce :: Ridged Band

The way you're talking I guess you're pretty young. Sure, try anything once I say. The problem with genital cutting is there's really no going back. Circumcisers are taught to remove as much mucosa as possible. It's meant to be permanent and 99.9% of the time it is. Only those of us who have the worst results are willing to wear some kind of expansion appliance around for the years it takes to regain some of our birthright.

The Greek Dude

The inside of my foreskin does not feel erogenous to me. It actually feels the same as the skin on the inside of my palm; sensitive, but not PLEASURABLE; Sensitivity has no correlation with sensation. As i've said before: i've had people try to massage, lick, kiss, and suck my foreskin and it was doing absolutely nothing for me. I actually felt bad because I was thinking: "I thought the foreskin was supposed to make sex better?"

And again, stretching out your shaft skin does NOT restore any nerve endings. The Meissner's Corpuscles on the inside of the shaft skin are more sensitive than the ones that're inside the prepuce, so if you notice any increase in pleasure at all it's because those nerve endings were moved further up the shaft. Which leads back in to relativity to the thread's topic:

Exposing the shaft skin, and leaving the scar actually makes the whole penis more sensitive, so that say. . .being deep of inside of someone and humping them would stimulate way more than just the head of your penis. Circumcised men commonly stroke the shaft because it feels better than stimulating the head; People who've recently undergone the knife commonly report that the scar line tingles and feels pleasurable during sex, since there are newly exposed nerve endings. Your circumcision scar becomes your "rigid band" in your "foreskin."

The few guys i've given oral to started shaking and moaning when I ran my tongue around the scar, and stroked it. They were cut at birth, so apparently there was plenty of time for desensitization.

(Space for Rent. PM for details)

cutdrew

I don't think mine's got any more noticeable as I've got older. It seems more obvious when I'm hard because there's a brownish mark and the skin on either side is quite different in colour, but I tend to get compliments and no one's ever complained. I didn't notice it when I was a kid but as soon as I found out what circumcision was I started to notice the scar on my own and on my mates, so for me it was just a matter of me becoming aware of it rather than it getting more obvious.

I've discovered that a lot of cut guys don't even realise they've got a scar.

The Greek Dude

Okay, so let me see if I understand:

The only "genuine" research is the type that confirms your own beliefs, and any survey, study or research that's inconclusive or produces results that say otherwise are biased and wrong?

I guess you can say this is a non-sequitor, so I call my own self on this one, However: The website you linked to glorifies the rigid band in the foreskin. The "foreskin" you've paid good money to "restore" has no rigid band in it, so according to your own information, it would seem pretty useless and impossible to properly define as a "foreskin."

When I was going through puberty, I spent a lot of time alone massaging and rubbing the rigid band, and not once did it ever send "waves of pleasure through my body," or make me ejaculate.

(Space for Rent. PM for details)

Ed69

[quote=The Greek Dude;1469697]Sensitivity has no correlation with sensation.Realy,that's news to me!



And again, stretching out your shaft skin does NOT restore any nerve endings.SO when I lost all feeling in the head of my dick at 30 and could not get erect I just imagined it?Stretching the shaft skin to cover the glans was what made me functional again.Explain that please,and no pscho bullshit[/quote]

Your study's mean nothing to me I have real life experience with disfunction and recovery.

Ed69

The Greek Dude

[quote=Ed69;1472009]Explain that please,and no pscho bullshit [/quote]

Okay, so if a person doesn't automatically say that buying a TLCTugger is the best thing in the universe, then they're a "pscho."

Quote:

Your study's mean nothing to me I have real life experience with disfunction and recovery.

And plenty of men have real-life experience being both naturally uncircumcised and circumcised, and they usually say that it had no significant effect on pleasure (some of them having it done for a few decades). How can their "real life experience" be wrong, and your "real life experience" be the only correct one?

See, all i'm doing here is showing that the Foreskin Restoration pact are just as one-sided and and set-in-stone as the other side. This is very similar to Republican vs Democrat, or Atheist vs Christian. In other words: immovable object vs irresistible force.

I could copy and paste a couple of articles from the British Journal of Urology, the World Health Organization or a few other sources, but as you've said, that would "mean nothing to [you]."

(Space for Rent. PM for details)

Ed69

[quote=The Greek Dude;1472066]And there you are correct.I know what my experience has been,and no government agency is going to tell me it did not happen.

E-man

I feel like I'm the only one on this forum who is happy with his circumcision. Every time I bring it up to people who are uncut, they try to make me feel bad about it and I feel like its so unnecesary. It can actually be hurtful, especially to people who don't like it and know there's not really anything they can do about it. Everybody has their preferences and there's no reason to try and convert everybody to anti-circumcisionism.