04-26-2008
|
#1 (permalink)
| | | Tips on intercourse I expect to try intercourse in the very near future, been getting very close consistently lately. Ive had a huge mental barrier on trying it but I think im over it. If someone could give me a few tips/pointers that would be helpful, i would feel a lot more confident about the whole thing. I don't think I will have trouble with lasting or anything like that, let me know what you got for me. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#2 (permalink)
| | | Dont call it intercourse | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#3 (permalink)
| | | Well you see, the penis goes into the vagina, and you naturally cum into it ... Quote:
Originally Posted by fak_et I expect to try intercourse in the very near future, been getting very close consistently lately. Ive had a huge mental barrier on trying it but I think im over it. If someone could give me a few tips/pointers that would be helpful, i would feel a lot more confident about the whole thing. I don't think I will have trouble with lasting or anything like that, let me know what you got for me. | If you are married to somebody of opposite sex, then sexual intercourse is a very intimate way to bond with your mate, and share pleasure with her. It's a very loving act, and it welcomes love to "overflow" and for babies to come alive, also an enlargement of human life and love.
Very beautiful.
I doubt that it's very complicated, for doesn't even nature show you what to do? Relax and let babies come alive, as they will, without awkward, experimental, anti-life, nasty contraceptives. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#4 (permalink)
| | | try intercourse?? you're a virgin? how old are you? | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#5 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by gingernuts Dont call it intercourse | Why not? Too much a "medical" term?
What do you call it then? Making whoopie! Fucking. Making babies. Making love?
Taking one's temperature?
Going upstairs? (to do you-know-what)
Planting seed? | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#6 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by pronatalist Well you see, the penis goes into the vagina, and you naturally cum into it ...
If you are married to somebody of opposite sex, then sexual intercourse is a very intimate way to bond with your mate, and share pleasure with her. It's a very loving act, and it welcomes love to "overflow" and for babies to come alive, also an enlargement of human life and love.
Very beautiful.
I doubt that it's very complicated, for doesn't even nature show you what to do? Relax and let babies come alive, as they will, without awkward, experimental, anti-life, nasty contraceptives. | Are we assuming he is going to have heterosexual intercourse, or is he preparing for homosexual intercourse? He doesn't say... | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#7 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by shinato try intercourse?? you're a virgin? how old are you? | Get married first.
Some years later, when you really do have to work "late," she has more reason to believe that you really have to work late, if you didn't fool around with sex, before getting married, and were faithful to her.
And yeah, there's some virgins left in the world. I'm still a virgin too. I haven't yet found that special someone, and I wouldn't want to "bond" with just anybody. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#8 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by pronatalist Get married first.
Some years later, when you really do have to work "late," she has more reason to believe that you really have to work late, if you didn't fool around with sex, before getting married, and were faithful to her.
And yeah, there's some virgins left in the world. I'm still a virgin too. I haven't yet found that special someone, and I wouldn't want to "bond" with just anybody. | Please don't breed. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#9 (permalink)
| | | Gender/identity confusion? Quote:
Originally Posted by exwhysee Are we assuming he is going to have heterosexual intercourse, or is he preparing for homosexual intercourse? He doesn't say... | Notice how I qualified that assumption, at the very beginning of my post?
What a shame that you can't just assume that it's normal married heterosexual intercourse? Most every other aspect of life, you assume that "male" parts only fit into "female" parts, such as with fitting pipe connections together, or electrical or stereo connections.
If it's the latter, then I would say, Don't do it. If the former, get married first.
Sounds like he's getting close with a girlfriend? But don't abuse her. Propose to her, ask her parents, put a ring on her finger, and promise never to leave her "until death do we part." It's so much easier to welcome the babies that can come, that way. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#10 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Strings Please don't breed. |
Sadly, it's this type that breeds uncontrolled.
These doctrines made perfect sense in the Roman times, when infant mortality rates were high, and believers were frequently persecuted and murdered.
Technology and sheer populations have rendered such dogmas well past their usefulness...but try explaining this to fundies using reason. When you reach your limit, just beat your head against the wall for something more effective to do. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#11 (permalink)
| | | My dear original poster. Don't cum into anything you arent sure is disease free or on a reliable form of birthcontrol. Buy some condoms for sure. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#12 (permalink)
| | | Worst responses Ive ever got at this site, why wouldn't you call it intercourse?
I am talking about random hetero penetration with a condom if you need the biggest details. Yes im a virgin. Im interested in trying it. Ive tried just about everything else besides penetration and want to go farther soon. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#13 (permalink)
| | | For all the "change" in the world, the world doesn't really change all that much. Quote:
Originally Posted by HazelGod
Sadly, it's this type that breeds uncontrolled.
These doctrines made perfect sense in the Roman times, when infant mortality rates were high, and believers were frequently persecuted and murdered.
Technology and sheer populations have rendered such dogmas well past their usefulness...but try explaining this to fundies using reason. When you reach your limit, just beat your head against the wall for something more effective to do. | We should advocate "uncontrolled" human breeding, as that is freedom. If there is to be "control" imposed, who is doing the "controlling?" I see nobody trustworthy to "control" but God, and God clearly commanded people to Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.
Sheer populations? Well what for, did God give man dominion over nature and other creatures? Because we are so smart? Ha! Maybe. Or because "we can?" No, I think it was invitation to naturally grow to such sheer numbers, that we would have no other option left but to "dominate" because there's so many of us. It was foretelling or commanding or causing humans to ultimately grow to become among the most populous of the large mammals.
How can people say that growing families, was for "way back when?" So let's say that we have lost the reason to have possibly large families, of filling an "empty" planet. There's no "shortage" of people these days, some might say. 100 great reasons to have children minus 1 reason, that's still around 99 great reasons to go on having children! So it's as relevant as ever. I even did an informal poll of people, that agreed with that conclusion, that God's commandment still applies. Everybody said it does, even some guy at work who said that world population is "huge," but it still applies. My sister said that God has not rescinded his commandment. Could it be that people don't want to be told how many children they can have? Could be a factor, but there are better reasons to promote the value and sacredness of each and every human life.
Somewhere I read that a new "paradigm" is needed. Well here's mine then. As the world population naturally grows vaster and denser, the big city must also be promoted as a place for people to have their "traditionally very large" families, as maybe there's now so many people, that we can't all live in the countryside anymore, and it still be "rural countryside?" But people can still enjoy having their big families, by people exploring how people can in fact, live and breed in closer proximity, at least on the global scale, so that all the more people can fit upon the planet.
I don't believe in "earth control," or the excessive "controlling" of nature to such an extent as to be detrimental to man. Thus, we should not bother to "control" our numbers, going against nature, and also, not all regions have need of humans to impose forest fire suppression, as if remote and unpopulated enough, nature can take care of wildfires naturally, far cheaper to taxpayers than humans can. Some aspects of nature, would still be better off left a bit "wild." Who says that the "sheer numbers" of people now alive, can't be "incredible?" I don't think God was joking when he promised Abraham descendents so numerous as to be nearly as uncountable as the stars of the sky, or the grains of sand in a seashore. Even Genesis 24:60 KJV foretells the "burgeoning billions" of today. "thousands of millions" of descendents, isn't that litterally billions of people? | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#14 (permalink)
| | | Sorry Pronatalist tends to throw every thread he posts in into a marriage, homophobic, baby making ridiculousness. | | | |
| |
04-26-2008
|
#15 (permalink)
| | | Pronatalist, why are you here? Are you here to indoctrinate? Or because you have a large penis? Once again you never answer the question on how many kids you have.
I'm beginning to wonder why you torture yourself being here amongst gay men and birth control. | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |