Circumcised Is Cool

No more rude than her many many posts that she makes on the subject in every thread she can.

If she wants to toss shit at people (telling men they're mutilated and have ugly cocks), she damned well ought to be able to catch the shit that comes back at her.

And if she can't, there's the door.

I can't say I have noticed her - I don't seem to go into many circ threads - I wandered in here because I thought it was the stationery cupboard and I needed a paperclip

I guess the username is a bit 'obvious'

But still - she wasn't nasty in the post he was responding to. Why not either try to have reasoned debate or ignore? That's the bit I don't get.

Also, women have to be part of the discussion if they, in their capacity of mothers are part of the decision makers when it comes to whether boys are cut or not at birth. So it makes no sense to dismiss them, when they need as much information and education about the various pros and cons as everyone else.

Wow.. This is the dumbest post I've read all week. Congrats.

As always this thread has taken the inevitable course

My username = my opinion !

Cut is my fav.

friction -wince-

that's one reason i prefer uncut.
my cut man is rubbing me raw. lol

But why does she (and her cronies) have to go around telling circumcised men that they're been mutilated, their sex lives are ruined and their cocks are ugly?

Be as anti-circumcision as you want but don't resort to insulting the cock of a complete stranger.

I don't go around hurling insults about certain kinds of breasts or vaginas simply to make a woman feel bad about themselves.

It's unfortunate the anti-circ freaks that post here don't treat people the way they want to be treated. I've seen in numerous threads where they've ganged up on some circumcised guy and told him he'd mutilated and derformed, has an ugly cock and should basically wish his parents dead. But when you respond to them, they get all up in arms as if we lowly circumcised men are supposed to bow to them and be grateful for the insults.

I don't recall a gang up of that nature happening to any one person. Please post links to the specific instances.

Check just about about circumcision thread where someone says they like being circumcised and you're bound to see the usual suspects (like yourself) ganging up on that one guy telling him how he's mutilated, his sex life is ruined and his cock is ugly. There was one I took particulary notice of last night and I was disgusted by it.

How bizarre (yeah right) that you don't recall such threads when you're one of the main culprits.

As I said, I couldn't care less if someone is anti-circumcision, but to tell a guy (and others who read the thread) that their mutilated, their sex lives are ruined and they have an ugly cock, well that's going way too damned far.

I've talked to many people that are strongly anti-circ, and i've talked to many people that are pro-circ. I've realized that 90% of all of these people are guys that were cut at birth, and that they're either pissed that they had no choice in the matter or they're glad they have no recollection of it. The rest of them are mothers that say "I regret that my husband is cut and all of my sons were cut," so it sounds like most of these people that have a strong belief about the matter have never seen or felt a real foreskin before, so they're going by theoretical information, or "I heard it's supposed to feel better," if you will.


I'm strongly against neo-natal circumcision, believe me. But, what about all of the guys that have it done later in life and have no problem with it?

[Devil's advocate]This could be true, but what about the guys that have it done in places like the UK, where society has absolutely no problem with the foreskin? These guys still claim that it looks and feels better to them, and if they would have asked people their opinion, they would have more than likely been told NOT to get it done. [/devil's advocate]

My point, is that I think both sides are really one-sided and biased for their own personal agenda. Neither side has the right to decide for everybody else, and until you can personally masturbate and have sex with both - if that's possible -, you can't really decide what feels better.

body modification.
personal choice.
some say a metal bar through the clit looks and feels better.
not to everyone's taste.
some will object to it.

Post a link to it so that everyone can see what bothered you. If you don't remember which thread then try looking in your browser's history.

My answer to that question: fine. I'm glad they have something they wanted and like it. If they cross the line into advocating R.I.C. -- as some do: "It was good for me so therefore it's good for everyone!" -- then I object.

Let me twist your question around: What about all of the guys that have it done later in life and do have problem with it?

Foreskins are gross. There was nothing wrong with mine but I hated it as a boy. My first wife persuaded me to be cut and that greatly improved sex for both of us. For me the best thing was having spontaneous oral sex in the most unlikely places - no one would want to do that to an unwashed uncircumcised penis! My only regret is that I wasn't cut at birth as my lucky brother had to be. Because of that difference between us we never got on, so I am VERY much in favour of Routine Infant Circumcision. Ric