04-17-2008
|
#631 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by playainda336 I read everything you say, digest it, and then excrete. | No kidding you excrete. Quote: |
And this doesn't explain why you choose Hillary over Obama.
| And that's your biggest flaw of all. I NEVER DID SAY that I picked Hillary over Obama. Again, I stated that I'm choosing Hillary or Obama in November. And I gave you the reasoning why I state this. But here it is again for you to try and comprehend:
1. The primary in New York is over.
2. Obama and Hillary will not go against each other in November. Either one or the other will win the nomination.
3. I only get one vote... and it's in NOVEMBER.
4. Hillary & Obama have similar stances on the issues that matter to me. McCain does not.
Use common sense and figure out what in the hell this means. If you can't, then please put your head into a sink full of water and inhale. Quote: |
The mere fact that you assumed I was a privileged White male is simply hilarious to me. Then I was an uneducated Black male. Now I'm naive and ignorant. Sigh. Get some new material...yours way is dated.
| Silly boy, I never called you an uneducated Black man. I can tell by the pathetic pictures in your profile that you're a sad and scared white boy that doesn't even have the balls to show your face in public. So proud to show off your dick, yet can't even get the guts to show people your true self. Also, I never said you were privileged just because I stated you've never went through the same types of discrimination as I. But considering my demographic and yours, it's pretty damn safe to say that you haven't. Last time I checked, a straight white male never had to fight for civil rights in this country over the last 4 decades.
But one thing is for certain... you've ALWAYS been naive and ignorant on this thread. Please, save the people who host this site the unnecessary fees for overused bandwitdh and stop responding to me. | | | |
| |
04-17-2008
|
#632 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy And that's your biggest flaw of all. I NEVER DID SAY that I picked Hillary over Obama. Again, I stated that I'm choosing Hillary or Obama in November. And I gave you the reasoning why I state this. But here it is again for you to try and comprehend:
1. The primary in New York is over.
2. Obama and Hillary will not go against each other in November. Either one or the other will win the nomination.
3. I only get one vote... and it's in NOVEMBER.
4. Hillary & Obama have similar stances on the issues that matter to me. McCain does not. | With all that being said, if you don't care who wins Hillary or Obama...then why debate the issue of Hillary vs. Obama in the first place? Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy Silly boy, I never called you an uneducated Black man. I can tell by the pathetic pictures in your profile that you're a sad and scared white boy that doesn't even have the balls to show your face in public. So proud to show off your dick, yet can't even get the guts to show people your true self. Also, I never said you were privileged just because I stated you've never went through the same types of discrimination as I. But considering my demographic and yours, it's pretty damn safe to say that you haven't. Last time I checked, a straight white male never had to fight for civil rights in this country over the last 4 decades. | -sigh-
When did I become scared and/or White. What makes me scared? And how do you figure that I'm scared to show my face in public? What do you do for your career...for mine, it is a conflict of interests to show my face. However, there are people on this site who have seen my face. I have no problem opening up to people who seem to be worth opening up to, but for every jackass who doesn't necessarily have my best interests at heart, what's the point.
Especially on a site for Large Penises. What the hell am I showing my face for? The expectation of a man (especially a Black man) on any adult-oriented site is to be an object of infatuation. Honestly, there was a time where I felt a need to be seen in such a regard, but I'm past the time in my life. The only reason I leave my pictures up now is because people enjoy them. There is absolutely no harm in my leaving them up there...so they remain.
Since you bring it up though...what is my true self? You don't even know me. I imagine you don't have any interest in doing so. So why do you concern yourself with the issue. For God's sake, I am Black. A young Black male. Why do you think that I am White? Black males constantly face discrimination in many regards ESPECIALLY in the last four decades...but that is a topic for another discussion. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy Use common sense and figure out what in the hell this means. If you can't, then please put your head into a sink full of water and inhale. | Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy But one thing is for certain... you've ALWAYS been naive and ignorant on this thread. Please, save the people who host this site the unnecessary fees for overused bandwitdh and stop responding to me. | You only don't want me to respond, because you have nothing to say.
A discussion about the three candidates', issues, credibility, character, etc. has turned into a constant attempt at character assassination on my person. I'm not quite understanding actually, but quite frankly...I couldn't care less.
But in the future, if you come to me...just come correct. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#633 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by playainda336 With all that being said, if you don't care who wins Hillary or Obama...then why debate the issue of Hillary vs. Obama in the first place? | Why join the debate? To try and defuse it. I figured I could get to the Obama worshippers by showing stories that are similar in nature to Hillary about character, just so they can see that Obama is a regular politician just like Hillary and just like McCain. Boy was I wrong about that! All it did was get people like you pissed off and me labeled as anti-Obama, even though I have multiple posts stating otherwise. Although I have to admit that it was rather funny to watch people try and spin my comments into one that vaguely represent theirs, especially since I've been essentially saying the same thing in political threads on this board since March.
My issue was with people who go over the edge with presenting Obama as this perfect candidate and denounce Hillary as the second coming of the Anti-Christ. It's crazy watching the two sides, both who support candidates that share the same values and views on the issues try to destroy each other on trivial bullshit. Even Obama stated on the last debate that the Democratic Primary has spun into an unnecessary obsession over manfactured issues that really have nothing to do with the REAL ones. You can bet, Republicans are having a field day watching fans of Obama & Clinton get all sidetracked with this drama. And all they're doing is fanning the fire, making sure it's blazing so that America can't see what's going on. One thing you can count on, the Republican have the ability to stick together even when the candidate they wanted doesn't get nominated. Democrats need to do the same thing if they ever expect to win in November. Quote: |
What makes me scared? And how do you figure that I'm scared to show my face in public? What do you do for your career...for mine, it is a conflict of interests to show my face. However, there are people on this site who have seen my face. I have no problem opening up to people who seem to be worth opening up to, but for every jackass who doesn't necessarily have my best interests at heart, what's the point. Especially on a site for Large Penises. What the hell am I showing my face for?
| My career is in computers. I do web design, technical support and some graphic design. And as you can see, I have no problems speaking my mind or letting people see who I really am. I know the reprecautions of putting my opinion out on a messgaeboard and I'm willing to take the response if it's a valid & objective one. Even though this site is supposed to be about big dicks, I don't let what is between my legs define me. And no, it has nothing to do with whether or not I'm hung or not. I'm from the old-school where it took 45 minutes to even receive a picture online, thanks to the days of IRC and dialup. And it took even longer to talk and develop a relationship with someone online before you even considered sending them a pic. If someone can't like me for who I am, then why should they even be interested in seeing my dick in the first place? Hence why I don't post one. And if by chance someone does get close enough to know how I'm packin', at least I know they do kinda like me to begin with. And I'll probably like them too, which means a potentially nice surprise in the pants. But I digress...
I find most people who cover or scribble over their faces in profiles on the internet to be cowardly. You want to have a voice and be respected for your opinions, yet the only glimpse you want people to have of you mentally is a dick and a torso. How twisted is that? Ever heard of the concept of first impressions? Same thing goes on the internet. You don't want to be perceived as a dick on the net? Make sure you post other reasonable pictures besides them. Same thing for the butt as well because there's plenty of assholes on the net as well. Quote: |
Since you bring it up though...what is my true self? You don't even know me. I imagine you don't have any interest in doing so. So why do you concern yourself with the issue. For God's sake, I am Black. A young Black male. Why do you think that I am White?
| I dunno... crappy photos? Quote: |
You only don't want me to respond, because you have nothing to say.
| No. I just hate arguing with people who can't or refuse to use common sense, which you have clearly demonstrated time and time again. You "digest & excrete" any voice of reasoning that supports a claim that is different from yours, which clearly shows you're not in this debate to look at things objectively. You've blamed me for being againsgt Obama, and I'm clearly not. You've misjudged my intentions when I linked to stories questioning Obama's character by thinking I was just bashing him because I liked Hillary. Even after I've stated that my only intention on doing it was to show people like you that he is just a typical politician like everyone else in this race. And before you claim that I haven't said that at all, let me show you some of my older political posts in other threads going back as far as March. Obama not ready to lead and protect us from day 1. Obama not ready to lead and protect us from day 1. Obama not ready to lead and protect us from day 1. Should Clinton bow out? Obama's "minister"?
And just for nostalgia... because there was at one point we did see eye to eye: Sick of the Obama Godlike bandwagon
As you can see (if you decided it was even worth it to click on the links), I never was against Obama to begin with. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#634 (permalink)
| | | Barry is ready..... he's got it. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#635 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by faceking Barry is ready..... he's got it. | What is the purpose of this schizophrenic nonsense? | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#636 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy I find most people who cover or scribble over their faces in profiles on the internet to be cowardly. You want to have a voice and be respected for your opinions, yet the only glimpse you want people to have of you mentally is a dick and a torso. How twisted is that? Ever heard of the concept of first impressions? Same thing goes on the internet. You don't want to be perceived as a dick on the net? Make sure you post other reasonable pictures besides them. Same thing for the butt as well because there's plenty of assholes on the net as well. | Kind of unfair.
There are all kinds of reasons ... often good ones ... not to post a pic of one's face.
You find them cowardly?
No. You decide they're cowardly.
In the teeth of potentially many valid reasons for keeping one's face off the screen. Reasons you can't expect to know.
Just sayin'. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#638 (permalink)
| | | what would looks have to do with the cogency of any thoughts posted on this or other site? Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy I find most people who cover or scribble over their faces in profiles on the internet to be cowardly. You want to have a voice and be respected for your opinions, yet the only glimpse you want people to have of you mentally is a dick and a torso. How twisted is that? Ever heard of the concept of first impressions? Same thing goes on the internet. You don't want to be perceived as a dick on the net? Make sure you post other reasonable pictures besides them. Same thing for the butt as well because there's plenty of assholes on the net as well.
| | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#639 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by senor rubirosa Kind of unfair.
There are all kinds of reasons ... often good ones ... not to post a pic of one's face.
You find them cowardly?
No. You decide they're cowardly.
In the teeth of potentially many valid reasons for keeping one's face off the screen. Reasons you can't expect to know.
Just sayin'. | That's what I meant, dear. You could use "find" or "decide" interchangably and it would mean the same thing. It's merely my opinion, that's all. I know people are going to disagree. I know the dangers of having your photo online, but I don't allow that to stop me from living my life. Besides, one would have to be pretty silly to use my photos and pretend to be me. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Nick4444 what would looks have to do with the cogency of any thoughts posted on this or other site? | I'm not judging anyone's intelligence based on looks. All I said was that I find it hard to listen to or even trust someone who is that secretive about their lives online. It's even harder for me to take anyone seriously if all I have for a visual of a person is a raging hardon. If I was having a discussion in public, I'm talking to someone's face and not their crotch. I'm not asking for a life story or PIN numbers for someone's ATM or Credit Card... just a proper representation of oneself. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#640 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Industrialsize | Nice joke... well, sorta.
Clinton won California and Nevada. Their total points on the Electoral College is 60. The remaining states only total 37. So, Obama doesn't have a stronghold in the West even if he won more states. Delegates do not determine the final election in November, and if we continue this Clinton/Obama drama it's only going to further divide the Democratic party. Maybe even to the point where people won't even vote if their favorite candidate doesn't win the nomination. And that would open the door for McCain to win even wider.
Also, according to the Election map found here: http://news.aol.com/elections/primary/main/democrats
You'll see that it's still possible for anyone of the candidates to win. Obama has 1,645 delegates to Clinton's 1,504. 824 remain. The needed total is 2,025. This contest can still go either way. Regardless of the outcome, I'm ready to vote for either or. I just hope people from both sides come together when it's finally needed. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#641 (permalink)
| | | Another slap in the face of the Clintoon campaign...
Long-time friend of the Clintons, Robert Reich, who served as the Labor Secretary in Bill's Cabinet (1993-1997), announced today that he is formally endorsing Barack Obama as the Democratic nominee for POTUS.
I can't wait to see the Richardson-style hitjob her campaign will do on him following this announcement. Quote: |
Originally Posted by CNN Robert Reich, a former Clinton cabinet member and longtime friend of the former president, has formally endorsed Barack Obama's White House bid, saying Friday that "my conscience won't let me be silent any longer." "Although Hillary Clinton has offered solid and sensible policy proposals, Obama's strike me as even more so," Reich wrote on his blog. He served as the Secretary of Labor from 1993-1997 and is currently a professor at UC Berkeley.
"His plans for reforming Social Security and health care have a better chance of succeeding," Reich continued. "His approaches to the housing crisis and the failures of our financial markets are sounder than hers. His ideas for improving our public schools and confronting the problems of poverty and inequality are more coherent and compelling. He has put forward the more enlightened foreign policy and the more thoughtful plan for controlling global warming."
Reich, whose relationship with the Clintons dates back to their law school days at Yale, has long been a critic of the New York senator's White House bid. Shortly before the Iowa caucuses in January, he wrote that voters would have a choice "between someone who talks the talk, and somebody who's walked the walk."
"I don’t get it," he wrote then. "If there’s anyone in the race whose history shows unique courage and character, it's Barack Obama. HRC’s campaign, by contrast, is singularly lacking in conviction about anything."
Reich also criticized Bill Clinton earlier in the year over the former president's sharp attacks on Obama in South Carolina.
“Bill Clinton’s ill-tempered and ill-founded attacks on Barack Obama are doing no credit to the former president, his legacy, or his wife’s campaign," he wrote in January. "Nor are they helping the Democratic Party."
Asked to respond to Reich's endorsement, Clinton spokesman Mo Eleithee said, "Didn't he endorse him last year?"
Reich is the latest former Clinton administration official to announce his support for Barack Obama. Last month, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who held several positions under Bill Clinton, also came out in support of the Illinois senator. Clinton supporter and James Carville later called that as an "act of betrayal." Carville is a CNN political analyst. | | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#642 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by HazelGod What is the purpose of this schizophrenic nonsense? | Barry is getting so snide and patronizing... he knows he's going to win the nomination. Hopefully soon... because he has plenty of questions to answer over the summer.... | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#643 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy That's what I meant, dear. You could use "find" or "decide" interchangably and it would mean the same thing. It's merely my opinion, that's all. I know people are going to disagree. I know the dangers of having your photo online, but I don't allow that to stop me from living my life. Besides, one would have to be pretty silly to use my photos and pretend to be me. | Dear, if you know the dangers of having your photo online, then you have in hand reasons for not posting them that have nothing to do with one's courage or fortitude or integrity.
If you think living your life turns on whether you post head shots on a big dick site, then I'm with you in saying that some people are going to disagree. | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#644 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy Clinton won California and Nevada. | California with 52 percent, Nevada with 51 percent. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy If we continue this Clinton/Obama drama it's only going to further divide the Democratic party. | Hard to say, if you're talking what will happen at election time.
And what's the point?
Reagan didn't drop out when Ford was leading. Ted Kennedy didn't drop out when Carter was leading. Jesse Jackson didn't drop out when Dukakis was leading.
And Obama's lead over Clinton is far narrower than those of the eventual victors in any of these races.
Where will an Obama supporter go if Clinton wins? Where will a Clinton supporter go in the far more likely event that Obama wins?
Of course, the rancor between the two sides is dividing the Democratic Party. That's what party nomination campaigns do, like any campaign.
But given the choice, come election day, between sitting on your duff at home, and defeating the party of George W. Bush, I can't believe many Democrats will find petulance a stronger motivation than the opportunity to install change. Of course, the future often surprises. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy This contest can still go either way. | Not very likely given the facts on the ground. Even in Pennsylvania, Clinton's lead is slipping dangerously; if she wins there, it will be by a margin of a modesty that seemed inconceivable even two weeks ago.
She's basically toast.
(I'm not over the moon about this. I liked Clinton and Obama, both.) | | | |
| |
04-18-2008
|
#645 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy Why join the debate? To try and defuse it. I figured I could get to the Obama worshippers by showing stories that are similar in nature to Hillary about character, just so they can see that Obama is a regular politician just like Hillary and just like McCain. Boy was I wrong about that! All it did was get people like you pissed off and me labeled as anti-Obama, even though I have multiple posts stating otherwise. Although I have to admit that it was rather funny to watch people try and spin my comments into one that vaguely represent theirs, especially since I've been essentially saying the same thing in political threads on this board since March. | So basically you enjoy instigating conflict. True enough. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy My issue was with people who go over the edge with presenting Obama as this perfect candidate and denounce Hillary as the second coming of the Anti-Christ. | Hillary supporters do the thing that you're accusing Obama supporters of doing. I never said Hillary's the Anti-Christ either. She's just a bold-faced liar. Simple as that. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy It's crazy watching the two sides, both who support candidates that share the same values and views on the issues try to destroy each other on trivial bullshit. Even Obama stated on the last debate that the Democratic Primary has spun into an unnecessary obsession over manfactured issues that really have nothing to do with the REAL ones. You can bet, Republicans are having a field day watching fans of Obama & Clinton get all sidetracked with this drama. And all they're doing is fanning the fire, making sure it's blazing so that America can't see what's going on. One thing you can count on, the Republican have the ability to stick together even when the candidate they wanted doesn't get nominated. Democrats need to do the same thing if they ever expect to win in November. | I agree. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy My career is in computers. I do web design, technical support and some graphic design. And as you can see, I have no problems speaking my mind or letting people see who I really am. I know the reprecautions of putting my opinion out on a messgaeboard and I'm willing to take the response if it's a valid & objective one. Even though this site is supposed to be about big dicks, I don't let what is between my legs define me. And no, it has nothing to do with whether or not I'm hung or not. I'm from the old-school where it took 45 minutes to even receive a picture online, thanks to the days of IRC and dialup. And it took even longer to talk and develop a relationship with someone online before you even considered sending them a pic. If someone can't like me for who I am, then why should they even be interested in seeing my dick in the first place? Hence why I don't post one. And if by chance someone does get close enough to know how I'm packin', at least I know they do kinda like me to begin with. And I'll probably like them too, which means a potentially nice surprise in the pants. But I digress... | Great for you. Computers is a field where it doesn't matter what your face looks like. What matters is the coding/programming/tech support that you do.
My career is not such where I am able to do that. I represent my company on the company hours and off. People see me. I am (one of the) face(s) of my company. Therefore, my face on such a site as this would look bad for my company. For all of your self-perceived intelligence did that thought come to mind as a consideration? Or are you so stuck on the "world according to Vinyl Boy" that you can't fathom the possibility. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy I find most people who cover or scribble over their faces in profiles on the internet to be cowardly. You want to have a voice and be respected for your opinions, yet the only glimpse you want people to have of you mentally is a dick and a torso. How twisted is that? Ever heard of the concept of first impressions? Same thing goes on the internet. You don't want to be perceived as a dick on the net? Make sure you post other reasonable pictures besides them. Same thing for the butt as well because there's plenty of assholes on the net as well. | What do you know? I am a dick. I know this. I embrace it actually. I guess I have to assume that you are nothing more than a talking head?
( What a load of crap.)
This is a site called "Large Penis Support Group" in the spirit of the website, I posted pictures of myself. I contributed. All in the spirit of good fun and community. Maybe you're afraid to show your penis because you feel like you don't measure up or something? Well, actually, no. I can't even make such an assumption because I'd be no better than yourself. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy I dunno... crappy photos?  | Well, you can't please everybody. God forbid I ever try to please you. Quote:
Originally Posted by VinylBoy No. I just hate arguing with people who can't or refuse to use common sense, which you have clearly demonstrated time and time again. You "digest & excrete" any voice of reasoning that supports a claim that is different from yours, which clearly shows you're not in this debate to look at things objectively. You've blamed me for being againsgt Obama, and I'm clearly not. You've misjudged my intentions when I linked to stories questioning Obama's character by thinking I was just bashing him because I liked Hillary. Even after I've stated that my only intention on doing it was to show people like you that he is just a typical politician like everyone else in this race. And before you claim that I haven't said that at all, let me show you some of my older political posts in other threads going back as far as March. | Actually, I'm very open to logical ideas, but you haven't said anything logical at all. And if your purpose was to "prove Obama is a typical politician" you've failed horribly. You haven't provided any objective information to prove it other than "that is how I feel" and "the colbert report said so". You know, what's even funnier, I don't know if you even read my posts. Because I've acknowledged (I think this is the third time now) that you said that you support both Hillary and Obama. All I see from you is that you like to instigate unnecessary conflict and you're no better than the Democrats you're so quick to chastise. Shame on you, Vinyl Boy. Shame on you. | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 PM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |