LPSG.ORG

Cut guys: when and why were you circumcised?

Originally Posted by Slant 20, because of phimosis. I had never seen my exposed head until that age. Similar here but 22 - couldn't work out why sex was so crap. J

is part of a discussion in the Underwear, Clothing, and Appearance Issues forum that includes topics on What to wear (to show or not to show), what's comfortable, what's not....

Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Underwear, Clothing, and Appearance Issues

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-07-2008   #16 (permalink)
dij1985 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slant View Post
20, because of phimosis. I had never seen my exposed head until that age.
Similar here but 22 - couldn't work out why sex was so crap.

J
 
Old 03-07-2008   #17 (permalink)
Jason321 is offline

Got cut as baby. Was for hygenic reasons.
Cut cock looks better and is sexier on a guy. I LOVE showing off my beautifull knob.
Would never want to be intact.
And it is NOT MUTILATION. Guys should stop whining that they didnt give permission to get cut.
So WHAT? if u dont like your cut cock, google restoration of foreskin and just get it over and done with.
Cut cock rule man!
 
Old 03-07-2008   #18 (permalink)
SteveHd is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason321 View Post
Got cut as baby. Was for hygenic reasons.
That doesn't make sense. Cut off a body part because someone's too inept to keep it clean?
Quote:
Cut cock looks better and is sexier on a guy. I LOVE showing off my beautifull knob.
Would never want to be intact.
It's a good that you like it because the inverse case has few solutions, none easy.
Quote:
And it is NOT MUTILATION. Guys should stop whining that they didnt give permission to get cut.
So far I'm the only one to mention mutilation in this thread and you fell into my trap. I only use the words mutilate/mutilation when referring to my own penis. Here are the reasons:
  • Misaligned raphe
  • Divots on glans
  • Scratches/Gouges on glans
  • Dark breadcrust circ. scar
  • Suture marks near circ. scar
I'm not going to stop "whining" about something that didn't need to be done.
Quote:
So WHAT? if u dont like your cut cock, google restoration of foreskin and just get it over and done with.
Oh good I'm glad you suggested F/R because I can blast that to Holy Hell! I'm doing it and have been for about 5 yrs. I'm nearly finished and I'm glad that I regrew a foreskin, but:
  • It isn't as good as a original.
  • It often takes 4-6 years, sometimes longer. Most guys don't have the patience to stick it out.
  • It won't reverse cosmetic damage such as what I listed above.
  • It won't reverse the damage of meatal stenosis, something I have.
Get it over and done with? Easier said than done.
Quote:
Cut cock rule man!
Not.
 
Old 03-07-2008   #19 (permalink)
BigMeatNJ is offline

was cut around 2 years old. was going to be left intact, but had excessive foreskin..am told the Dr called it "redundant foreskin". had something like a 2" overhang at that age. am now partial cut but with enough skin left to cover the head almost completely when soft, but recedes when hard. cut might look nicer to you guys, but I think uncut usually looks better..unless of course it is medically necessary like phimoisis. I do wish I had all that extra skin still! hey..given a chance I might have grown into it!!!
 
Old 03-07-2008   #20 (permalink)
Matt Cohen is offline

Cut aged 16.

My choice, my foreskin was long and I believed my penis would look and feel better without foreskin.

Never regretted it. I prefer being circumcised.
 
Old 03-07-2008   #21 (permalink)
danerain is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaredLittleBoy View Post

Mmmm, that is so sexy
 
Old 03-07-2008   #22 (permalink)
zp28 is offline

I was cut when I was born, but it was a loose cut, so I still have some foreskin. Would of rather been left intact.
 
Old 03-07-2008   #23 (permalink)
Gab_Stone is offline

Cut when baby. I didn't even know there was a different way to be for a long time. And I don't think I ever even saw an uncircumsized penis until after high school. (I never looked at other guys if I had a choice). I'm happy because honestly I think it looks neater. And the health issues I hear are better for cut. The only thing I don't like is that I have a few tiny scars from the stitches. You can't see them unless looking for them up close, but I see them. Anyways. I like it.
 
Old 03-07-2008   #24 (permalink)
krispdx is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by zp28 View Post
I was cut when I was born, but it was a loose cut, so I still have some foreskin. Would of rather been left intact.
Me too, zp28. Got cut at birth, but I'm thankful that it was a loose cut so I still have plenty of skin to move around. But it would be fun to know what it would have been like with a foreskin.
 
Old 03-07-2008   #25 (permalink)
Phil Ayesho is offline

At birth...

Aesthetically, Much prefer circumcised look and feel. Have had several compliments from women on the coloring, my natural swarthy colored shaft, dark brown band, and dusky rose glans.

Feelwise? can't say much die to age of it being done... but have spoke to several men who had it done as adults and who have all preferred the skinless feel. ( not so much during sex, per se... but as an all the time sensation.)

Health?
Science says its much healthier, reduces chances of STD infections...

Mutilation?
I don't believe it mutliation any more than shoving a piercing needle all the way thru the head was.
I am in favor of aesthetic and sensual enhancment...
 
Old 03-07-2008   #26 (permalink)
Sinnerly is offline

I am in favor of choice and nature. If, as an adult, you want to modify your body via tattoo, piercing, branding, scarification, circumcision, etc, feel free, but who would tattoo a baby? It's cruel because it's thievery.
 
Old 03-08-2008   #27 (permalink)
Phil Ayesho is offline

Ahh... they don't remember it... they don't miss it... and after having gotten to know some women, both my sons thanked me for having it done... most girls seem to prefer the trimmed variety.


You might as well call piercing a little girl's ears mutilation... or suggesting that they shave their legs as an adolescent a form of abuse.


I can't believe the intense emotionalism of the "anti-cut" campaigners... who cares? It is so inconsequential to anything in life...

Trust me, you do more damage to your kids by letting them watch TV than snipping a bit of useless skin offa their dicks at an age when teething is more traumatic....



Cutting off a woman's clitoris?
That is analgous to cutting off a man's entire glans... it ain't "female circumcision"... its clitorectomy, and a bonafide mutilation.


I've seen men's members with and without... and, aesthetically, it looks better without..
by the same token, I've seen men and women with their pubes wild and unruly, and with them neat and trimmed... and they look better trimmed.


At this age, I 'naturally' grow hair out of my ears and my nostrils....

I have absolutely no problem undoing what nature does on that score...
and if I had sprouted hair from my nostrils and ears as a baby...
I hope to dear god my parents would have had it permanently removed.
 
Old 03-08-2008   #28 (permalink)
liberalcynic is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter20 View Post
Indeed, cut looks better. I've always been cut. No choice here too, but nevertheless pleased that I'm cut.
Crap! It's your perception, Since you're most likely from a nation where it is the normal to remove biota from the body you see that as perfection. Whilst in countries where the uncut penii is the norm it is concidered perfection.
 
Old 03-08-2008   #29 (permalink)
open501s is offline

Circumcision like all body modifications should be done as your choice, after your an adult.
 
Old 03-08-2008   #30 (permalink)
SteveHd is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Ayesho View Post
... they don't remember it... they don't miss it...
Even though they don't remember it, it still hurts. If it isn't needed then there's no need to inflict pain. No medical governing board recommends R.I.C.

As adults they may not "miss" their foreskin, but many men regret it was taken from them. Note how many at LPSG have written that they wish they still had theirs.
Quote:
You might as well call piercing a little girl's ears mutilation...
Most piercings don't remove a body part and they can be reversed so there isn't much analog to circumcision.
Quote:
I can't believe the intense emotionalism of the "anti-cut" campaigners... who cares? It is so inconsequential to anything in life...
I likewise can't believe the intensity and emotionalism of the pro-cutters. If it's "inconsequential" then why advocate doing it to someone who has no say in the matter?

Celebrities are inconsequential to most people's lives but look at how much discussion there is about them.

The O/P is pro-cut, are you going to criticize him for starting a circ. thread?
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7