Up-Front-Bulge or Down-the-Leg-Package?

Hey, when a guy's clothes barely hide his magnificent manhood, do you prefer to see a big round bulge right at the crotch? Or do you prefer to see it the outline of a large organ going down one pant leg?

I often wear boxers and so my organ goes down a pant leg. If I get semi-erect, people can see the outline of my cockhead's crown.

A friend of mine buys these briefs (and they are very brief - barely enough to hold back his largeness) for her husband. The briefs lift the flaccid organ and display it up front like a huge bulge.

I admit I like both looks, but prefer seeing the shape of a cock rather than a mere bulge.

i agree, in any case, i would rather see more detail than less.. and as for those shapeless mounds that both sit up front and creep down the leg... it's wierd to see a shape that looks full of water... i try to remind myself that everyone has their "thing", so i don't judge..

when mines soft i just let it hang to the left side of my boxer breifs, when its hard its too obvious , best thing to do is pull it up straight and let it stick out the top of your pants with yoru shirt covering it, that way its not sticking straight out, ive had to do that trick many times leaving class back in highschool, lol

Quietguy: I agree with you. A few years back, I noticed younger guys at the gym wearing mesh gym shorts or track pants with boxers. I was amazed at what they were showing, especially doing the bench press! Once I tried boxers instead of briefs with my gym shorts, I was hooked. Hanging loose feels much better than wearing snug underwear, and seeing the VPL is hot.

A good-looking friend of mine I worked with doesn't wear any underwear.
Sometimes you can see the outline of the head of his cock to his right
side of the zipper. That was a huge turn-on for me; I wanted to reach
down and rub that on many occasions when we were alone, but not sure how he would have reacted(!).

Welcome to SPAM.com
i rather have it inside me

Sometimes the crotch of one's pants, is just a bit too small to contain some big penises. So let it hang.

I prefer to see the outline of a large organ going down one pants leg. Sure the mere bulge is less conspicuous, but boxers are more comfortable and less restraining, and so big penises do tend to sometimes naturally snake down a pants leg. So it's understandable to me, that sometimes big or long penises are just going to show their shape somewhat.

I prefer to see it hang. I have to let mine hang , maybe that's why.

Having a big penis is not always a treat...It can be bothersome, don't you think?

But is "bothersome" really so bad?

I prefer to see it hang, as it's more natural and comfortable than all heaped up in some nasty-feeling, over-restrictive "tighty whities." Of course, I wear only boxers.

I can't imagine making some unneeded comment, about somebody's rather innocent, actually not that conspicuous, bulge supposedly showing a bit too much. Like why should I care? Everybody knows already that guys have penises. Yeah, sometimes penises may seem a tad "just too big."

Yeah, a normal penis shaft looks more natural than a weird "mound."

When it's soft, sometimes it may mold into the weirdest shapes, sort of like jello, and then does a person almost look "deformed?"

"More detail" can sometimes look better, because it looks more natural.

But people really should wear some form of underwear. Most of us don't want to see a "show it off" level of detail. And then the real reason for underwear, is to prevent genital chaffing or help contain those normal minor urine dribbles after a visit to the restroom.

Sometimes erections just won't easily hide.

Don't you also need a cover-it-up sweater or coat or something, for that trick to work? Seems less risky of exposure to just have a big "log" or "snake" down one's pants leg? Some people aren't just long, but have girth as well, so it's going to show no matter what.

Some episode of Roseanne "discovered" that it's normal for young guys going through puberty, to sometimes get spontaneous erections and even "tent up," like her son did while riding on the school bus, the bus being likened to a "vibrator" that of course can't be shut off.

I am not amazingly large... but large enough that briefs create a bulge that sticks out quite a bit and is far more noticeable than if I just let it hang.

With today's looser fitting jeans, the hanging down a leg option is far less conspicuous. And, as a plus, I can wear ball stretchers all day without drawing attention.
Can't wear ball stretchers with briefs...

There have been times I've hung down my leg. A coworker made a comment that he could see I was circumcised. I try now to get it to just point to the right rather than down the leg. Which direction do you guys think is most appropriate?

OK, I'm the odd one out, but I don't like bulges of any sort on anybody. The tit-fixation of most men turns me right off for starters, and on men (lower down) it just looks gross and shows up a poor choice of dress style. Concealing (or harmonising) the whole outfit is easier said than done, as I well know, but if I'm aware that things have got out-of-hand(?) and obvious down there, I'm not happy.

Well-hung=more visible, all the time?

Hanging down naturally.

Pointing to the right or hung down the leg? Sounds like almost the same thing, if a penis is big enough to fall down by gravity? Assuming boxers that is.

I think pointing too much to the side, is more conspicuous than a penis pointing more downward.

It seems to be that some well-hung penises are just going to show, no matter what. Maybe you can only minimize the bulge somewhat, never always get rid of it.

Can VPL be so bad, when women's boobs always show?