Camera inside pussy as cock cums...

Yeah, Nova's "Miracle of Life" was really cool, also PBS's "The Nature of Sex" where they showed a human birth. What better cool use for the vagina, than showing it pushing yet another precious human life into the world?

People should still be encouraged to reproduce naturally, and welcome families to grow naturally, possibly "large," so that all the more fellow human beings can experience life.

One of the best threads so far.

Congrats.

+

there was one in BBC's life channel... can't remenber the name, but it wasn't a thermal image... it was in living color! :D

I've seen several of these. The Miracle of Life was the first to show this kind of footage. I saw the making-of documentary and while they didn't show the sex shots, I think a lot of the shots inside the body other than the vaginal shots (such as inside the urethera, etc.) weren't as they seemed. I always thought they somehow ran a camera through a guys plumbing but they showed how they took shots inside the blood vessels using a vessel taken from a cadaver. I can only assume that a lot of the internal shots may have been taken the same way.

There was a BBC documentary that had similar internal intercourse shots. I heard it was "The Human Sexes" but I got the whole series from the university library and watched all of it and there was no such shot. It must have been a different documentary, but I have no idea what the title was. I found a short clip of it online and it did have a British narrarator so it was probably from the BBC.

I also saw another different clip online, this one with an American narrarator but I have no idea what it was from.

These three series had similar shots where you could see part of the head of the penis as it ejaculated. I don't know for sure if any of these shots were acutally taken inside the vagina or were faked. What they also had in common was that the camera angle was from next to the penis so you were looking at it at nearly a 90-degree angle. While interesting, that's not the best shot.

In 2006 or 2007, there was a British TV series called "A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex" that ran on channel 5 in the UK. I heard about it and found the torrents and got all eight episodes. This weekly series covered a bunch of different topics, but each week they showed a different sexual position. I believe that four of these episodes (four of the first five if I remember) show internal cumshots. What makes this series different from the others is that they have cameras at the base of the penis looking outward and one near the vaginal opening, which means you get two camera angles as the guy inserts his penis. There is also a camera inside the vagina looking out, and this is the angle where you can see the penis thrusting toward the camera and eventually ejaculation. These shots put the other three series to shame because these shots not only have the best camera angle, but the lighting and focus are good.

When I saw this, it was what I had always wanted to see. It was extremely interesting and erotic to me at the same time.

Here's some info on that series.
"A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex" (2006)

There are also some clips available at another forum (if this is allowed) at:
Sex Education
There's a separate thread for each episode. You can watch clips online in flash video format. Go check it out. All the other series are a waste of time compared to this one.

Cool.

I imagine that "living color" they don't always like to do, as then the distinction between lustful porn and "educational," just doesn't seem quite so clear.

And the thermal image of the growing penis, is curious in its way, as you can see the penis "warming" up as the blood flow surges into it. Quite "educational," yeah, that's it.

No more uninformed people thinking that a bone slides into the penis. It's clearly warm blood causing it to swell up and become erect. The term "bone up," merely means it feels a little like possibly a "bone" inside.

But I hardly think it "obscene" to show a baby emerging from the vagina on prime time TV. I would think or hope that governments, media, or whatever, should want to encourage people to reproduce more naturally, within marriage but of course, for ideally altruistic reasons, in that with simply a naturally larger population, more people can benefit from experiencing life.

Im sorry if you think that no birth control or condoms should ever be used. Im going to use both until im ready to be a father. And this the more babies the better is not right either. This wold is over populating at an alarming exponential rate. we are already exhausting the earths supply of food, so if someone wants to cut down on the number of babies they have the more power to them, unless you want your kids to live in a place in which they will starve and suffer from over population.

The more populated we get, the more people there are who rather like living, so it's for the good. Many people believe in having possibly large families or not hindering the natural flow of human life, for various sorts of reasons. Many love children or are good at nurturing children. Many have "religious objections." Many simply don't fear having supposedly "too many" children. And many don't think that 4 or 5 children is even "a lot."

The more people there are, the more food that is produced. The more food can be sold, so farmers make more.

I do want my children to live in a world with even more people, because if there aren't more people, then how did my children get to be born? If I reproduce, wouldn't most everybody else have that God-given right as well?

I don't believe the Malthusian gloom-and-doom nonsense. Humans are getting so numerous, because we were designed to grow so numerous. Who are we to question "the way that things must be," or God? Especially when we benefit so much by it? Well I might question, but I don't have to argue against the proper natural way of such things.

Why would I want to cut down on the number of babies that I might have? Children are a blessing. To "try" to have fewer children, is like trying to be poor. While it might be possible, of what use could it be? When it would be more "profitable" to try to be rich.

By letting babies push out naturally, we need not subject our bodies to be being guinea pigs or laboratory rats, for the latest fad contraceptive potions and poisons. What more natural and elegant way can there be to "space" babies, than an already occupied womb?