Is NAMBLA real?

I think the forefathers were thinking about freedom to speak on policy, equality, rights, religion, etc...

Bastardization of the Constitution in it's finest form. They never dreamed in a million years, that they'd have to put something in the Constitution around the rights and fucking protection of children.

And to think lib whackos spend time blowing up Hummer dealerships in the name of "Green", yet NAMBLA get protectionism better than Mother Theresa roaming the streets of Bombay.

Thankfully opinions are like assholes...everybody's got one. The ACLU would even protect your reactionary ass. They are there for everybody.

The right seems to dislike the Bill of Rights. Freedom of Speech is not something they would like for everyone. Didn't their fearless leader, GWB, say it best? "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush

I don't like what NAMBLA does or says. I do like my freedom to say anything and express myself. Without universal freedom of speech, the government has to pick and choose who gets to say what. That means that I might be censored one day and I might not be able to say what I need to say. I'm against that.

On this selfish principle I'll defend NAMBLA's freedom to express themselves. And I'd even devend the right of the KKK and the Westboro Baptist Church's right to express themselves.

I'd hope not... in that case I'd rather die with my boots on. Nevermind, I'd never be such a fuck up to need the ACLU in the first place.
ACLU, is like unions... good at first, but now evil manifestations out of good original intentions.

ACLU is like injury lawyers looking to sue coffee shops for serving hot coffee that might burn their customers.

1-800-SUE-ACLU

Libs defending the NAMBLA and ACLU reminds me of cons defending Strom Thurmond and Jerry Falwell.

blah blah Freedom of Speech and Assembly.

Using "Libs" as a pejorative is creative and original.

As far as I know, the ACLU has never supported NAMBLA's right to molest children. They support their right to express their views.

Yes, and that's all I'd support about NAMBLA too. I find it interesting that some people are only for free expression of ideas they like.

Um "Guy"

Do a search on "neo-con" and "libs" here... compare results.

Sho' nuff.

and don't use words that you hurt yourself typing out... pejorative... are you kidding me???!!!! Lawdy. Depreciatory is maximum allowable for the LCD amongst this group. Pejorative...

Hey, if you want to put yourself on the same level as the morons you're rallying against, go for it. But really, "Libs" as a pejorative is just plain lazy at this point.

That's cute. I really don't feel the need to prove my intellect to you. My past posts on this forum have proven it for me. And yours, I am sorry to say, have spoken for your intellect time and time again.

No, you are far more smarter than the average bear. My intellect, factual statements, research, rhetoric... I hope have spoken for me. That fact that we are not on the same page, and your comment herein, shows how I can't even have a civil debate. Typical. I calmly disagree = I'm dumb. Lawdy.

This is what happens too often here on LPSG. Where's DC DEEP or Stronzo to send this into overdrive????

Maybe you were confused about how our conversation went. You were the one who called me stupid. I quote:

You had already resorted to a lack of civil debate when you used the term "Libs" as a pejorative.

And please, climb down off the cross. It's pathetic, and it doesn't suit you.