LPSG.ORG

Cut Vs Uncut larger

Who seems to have the edge on size Cut Uncut larger

is part of a discussion in the Sex With a Large Penis forum that includes topics on Real-life experiences, techniques, pros and cons, injuries, masturbation, etc..


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Sex With a Large Penis

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-06-2008   #1 (permalink)
azkiker is offline
Thumbs up Cut Vs Uncut larger

Who seems to have the edge on size Cut Uncut larger
 
Old 02-06-2008   #2 (permalink)
SpoiledPrincess is offline

When you cut bits off something it always gets smaller.
 
Old 02-06-2008   #3 (permalink)
azkiker is offline

This one should stir things up..
 
Old 02-06-2008   #4 (permalink)
SlimGuySB is offline

Only because you are trolling. What a stupid question.
 
Old 02-06-2008   #5 (permalink)
MHV2040AH is offline

I really like the big uncut ones, they seem to just be a bit bigger so to speek
 
Old 02-06-2008   #6 (permalink)
npllvr is offline

Uncut cocks seem thicker, sexier!
 
Old 02-06-2008   #7 (permalink)
douggy is offline

oh fuck! Please. The skin on the outside has NOTHING to do with it..... Size was determined 9 months before a scalpel could have possibly encountered that little piece of skin
 
Old 02-06-2008   #8 (permalink)
cutedorkwho is offline

LOL @ this thread.




fail.
 
Old 02-06-2008   #9 (permalink)
What to do? is offline

Circumcision does affect penis size, but only an average of 8mm (erected length) is lost...unless something goes wrong.
What is lost after circumcision?
 
Old 02-07-2008   #10 (permalink)
SteveHd is offline

What is lost after circumcision?

The above would be sobering reading to those new to circumcision topics.

The page mentioned the Richters et al study. Here's the abstract from that study:
Abstract:- "As part of a study investigating the adequacy of the Australian Standard for latex condoms, we arranged for self-measurement of the erect penis by a volunteer sample of 156 men, predominantly Caucasian. The kits contained illustrated instructions and paper tapes which the respondents mailed back to us marked with creases to indicate their dimensions. Mean penile length was 16.0 cm (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.2-19.8 cm) and circumferences were: base 13.5 cm (95%CI 0.7-16.2); shaft just below coronal ridge 12.4 cm (95%CI=10.0-14.8); glans 11.9 cm (95%CI 9.6-14.2). Repeat measurements of 15 men showed intraclass correlations (r) of 0.90 for length, 0.68 for base circumference, 0.87 behind ridge and 0.87 glans. Non-users of condoms were more likely to have narrower penises. In a subsample of 66 men who reported on perceived condom comfort, men with wider penises (base circumference) were more likely to find condoms too tight. Men with longer penises were more likely to complain that condoms were too short. Circumcised men had shorter erect penises than (p<0.05). The paper recommends that the measurement technique described in this study should be applied to other populations, and that condoms should be manufactured and marketed in a wider range of lengths and widths."
The bottom line: An inadvertent finding was that cut penises average ~3/8in less than intact penises.
 
Old 02-07-2008   #11 (permalink)
reid96816 is offline

uncut seem to be bigger...
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7