The Penis is a Muscle!

playainda336 · 01-26-2008

He said 16, 60, and 67. ROFL...he took the same picture, in the same place, three times, from the same angle, over the course of 44 and 7 years?

Bullshite, sir, bullshite.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Industrialsize

That's exactly the same pic enlarged twice.......My humble opinion, penis enlargement is equivalant to snake oil. My nonerect penis is about 2 inches, my erect penis is 8.5 inches. Where does all that "Muscle" go when I'm flaccid????

Wow...seriously? That's insane! lol.

fowfer · 01-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by Industrialsize

doesn't change the fact that it's the same pic 3 times and illustrates nothing

I can't beleive I even take the time. Quoting the original post, "resized to illustrate". I told this forum up front that they were "resized" to "illustrate" my size at that time(age 16 and before PE) as compared to pic 3 which is present.

Just read playainda's response. Can't beleive 2 grown men can't read or comprehend english. I can beleive that most members would not subject themselves to the barrage of critcism from unqualified critics and naysayers.

I leave the rest of this discussion to all of you. I done.

Industrialsize · 01-26-2008

then I'll repeat myself again
doesn't change the fact that it's the same pic 3 times and illustrates nothing!

what was the point of showing the same pic 3 times????You would have been more convincing if you showed 3 different pics at 3 different stages of your "growth"

crescendo69 · 01-26-2008

It's like paranormal stuff - so difficult to prove!

playainda336 · 01-26-2008

This one is pretty simple to prove.

Normally I don't take the time to call people on fakes, but this one was so obvious. It's highly improbable to take the same picture the same way three times...nevertheless a picture from you being 16 to a picture where you are 67?

In the picture, he's standing over something...a chair/desk maybe. So he's kept this same chair/desk from age 16 to age 67? And I'm pretty sure his pubic hair would look slightly different from 16 to 67.

PinkSteel · 01-26-2008

This isn't rocket science people
The penis is mostly made of a sponge tissue, a tube for urination and ejaculation, and a nervous sytem (of which I think god on a daily basis).

People with more porous sponge tissue tend to shrink to be smaller when at rest and more blood is required to fill the same amount of sponge area than one that is less porous. Hense the difference between a grower and a shower.

The cock fills with blood giving the person an erection. The muscles at the bottom of the groin can be tightened and loosened to make the cock seem to be a muscle. On tightening a bit more blood is forced into the penis causing it to become harder and appear to be a muscle itself.

PinkSteel · 01-26-2008

RE: My favorite self size comparison pic is attached. The largest is actual and the smaller ones resized to illustrate my size at that time. The smallest when I was 16, the middle when I was 60, and the last I was 67.

HA HA I really like the way the upolstry fabric dots get larger too!!
(sooooooooo busted!!!!)

Cycleman · 01-26-2008

jason_els · 01-26-2008

Fowfer states the picture does not show ANY growth.

The picture was posted to show the relative changes to his penis over time even though the picture shows NO growth and is NOT of his penis.

There is nothing to bust because Fowfer did not claim it shows growth.

superlarge · 01-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by jason_els

There is nothing to bust because Fowfer did not claim it shows growth.

Clearly.

I sometimes wonder why you bother with this site. I've grown very tired of spinning my wheels here, and don't really have the time lately.

jason_els · 01-26-2008

It isn't because of the Making It Bigger forum, I can tell you that. Shit like this would never be tolerated at the other sites. I agree, it's discouraging to see so many allegedly supportive people in an allegedly supportive forum go to all this trouble to spread ignorance and opprobrium.

I can only hope that the more intelligent posters who know how to read and think objectively will be able to slash their way through this jungle of hyenas.

Quote:

Originally Posted by superlarge

Clearly.

I sometimes wonder why you bother with this site. I've grown very tired of spinning my wheels here, and don't really have the time lately.

Industrialsize · 01-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by jason_els

It isn't because of the Making It Bigger forum, I can tell you that. Shit like this would never be tolerated at the other sites. I agree, it's discouraging to see so many allegedly supportive people in an allegedly supportive forum go to all this trouble to spread ignorance and opprobrium.

I can only hope that the more intelligent posters who know how to read and think objectively will be able to slash their way through this jungle of hyenas.

Just remember, because someone may not agree with you, it doesn't mean they are either ignorant or not intelligent......they just don't agree with you...It's called a discussion.

jason_els · 01-26-2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowfer

Radicaldick and Industrialized - It would be good if you two would read and understand the post before you criticize. I very pointedly commented that the first two pictures were to illustrate my size at those periods of my life.
The third picture was my actual size at age 67.

Now, I will say that you have a right to your opinion whether it be on whether PE works or not or what type tissue the penis is made up of. You even have the right to your opinion on whether I gained or not.

Again, I will state for a fact that I did gain from 7" x 5.7" to 8.75" x 6.25", To me that says that PE is not only possible but it works. I don't know how you arrived at the fact???? PE does not work if you haven't given it a fair trial. I'm sure you wouldn't make such a calm on hearsay alone.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Industrialsize

doesn't change the fact that it's the same pic 3 times and illustrates nothing

But it does Blanche! It DOES!!

You and other people miscomprehended what was written in the post!

THE PICTURE IS NOT OF FOWFER'S PENIS

THE PICTURE WAS NOT REPRESENTED AS FOWFER'S PENIS

FOWFER DID NOT CLAIM IT WAS A PICTURE PROVING GROWTH IN THAT PARTICULAR PENIS

FOWFER POSTED IT THE PICTURE TO GIVE A RELATIVE COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN HIS PENIS.

Jesus Christ! Give you people published medical studies conducted by physicians, anatomical illustrations, and still it doesn't sink in. What? Does it threaten you that guys might be able to get bigger? Maybe get as big or even bigger? Afraid you'll lose your amen corner?

Really! I'd really love to know what motivates people of at least high school education to lose all rationality and just blast what they either don't emotionally want, can't rationally comprehend, or both.

Every time I have asked for what evidence there is that PE doesn't work I'm met with silence. Know what that proves? It proves you're talking out your ass.

There's a mean streak in some LPSG members and that saddens me. Here are guys trying to get bigger and all they're met with are ridicule and dismissal. Making It Bigger wasn't created for trolling.

Industrialsize · 01-26-2008

Yikes Jason....you needn't scream, I wasn't referring to the OP, I was referring to the topic of PE in general........salient arguments can be made on either side of the issue as to whether it works or not......Peace

superlarge · 01-26-2008

Fowfer is a legend in the PE world. Thousands of PEers have 'fowfered'. He wasn't trying to illustrate this as any sort of proof. He was simply joining in this discussion on pe with simulations of changes concerning himself in regards to PE. He has a long history in the PE world and I was honored to see him post. Of course it's not picture proof. He wasn't presenting it as such. This rush to judgement against PE is obvious. His intended light post of what he thought might 'look interesting' didn't deserve this.

The Penis is a Muscle!

He said 16, 60, and 67. ROFL...he took the same picture, in the same place, three times, from the same angle, over the course of 44 and 7 years? Bullshite, sir, bullshite. Originally Posted by