Beckham Armani Ad BULGE!!

Aubergine stuffed down there according to the UK newspaper "The Sun" which had the photo on its cover today.

David Beckham | Adrian Chiles | Armani | You’re above this, Beckham | The Sun |HomePage|News

Ah, the English gutter press.
No surprise.
Becks made a big mistake, I'd say.

Errrrrm ... doesn't exercise increase definition ... and if I were readying myself to model in a worldwide campaign for the worlds biggest clothing designer I too would increase my exercise program as I am sure DBeckham did ... as far as his cock ... everything in photos gets digitally enchanced and airbrushed that does not mean he doesn't have big balls, it means in advertising they do such things as a ploy to get us talking about his balls and their brand ... this thread merely shows how we have been sucked into the fantastic and timeless marketing ploy ... hence why Armani is successful and Posh Spice doesn't give a flying fuck about this thread ... lol

Is this some lame joke? It's stuffed, and badly so.

His penis is to the side, not over his balls, you can see the bulge!

Oh give me a break!

With all the media hype, speculation about this current new pic being photo-shopped (or some other special effect), then it would seem that Mr. Beckham has seemingly been made a laughing stock...exactly the opposite of "being portrayed as a man to envy".

But then, such notoriety sells products I guess.

Nevertheless, I still feel quite gullible at what (obviously) fake images I have been known to be impressed with over the years.

LOL---
'Goes to show that if we're really desperate for being titillated?
Then, anything will apparently work.....if the mood happens to be right.

Big stuffed balls, dick pushed off to the side.... Is this what "bend it like Beckham" means?!

i don't think it's fake so much as it's a convention of the underwear modeling industry. it's just what's done and been done for years, and what flies in major magazines.

I just looked up the definition of "fake" which says: "Having a false or misleading appearance; fraudulent." So if these big bulges aren't the real thing, wouldn't they fit that definition?

I dunno. In retrospect, I've just fallen for too many of these misrepresentations I guess over time and I'm quite bored with it all.

(I'm actually rather proud of my progress! ---not being so easily impressed as I once was. I'm recognizing all the falsehoods that are out there )

OMG he is sexy as f*ck! Victoria is one lucky woman!!!

OMG...there's so much sniping about this man! I think he's just a nice, lean, handsome athlete with a phenomenal business manager...

If you are very slim and have abs like his you can have a 3 inch flaccid cock and avg sized balls and look big. The truth is: whether you like him or not he has a very hot sexy body.

Where do people get all these facts about celebs?

Here I say something to with nothing to really back it up. Beckham does not have a penis, where his penis would be is actually Richard Simmons.

This picture would actually be negative towards convincing me to buy those probably overpriced underwear.

It isn't the size of the bulge, but the fact the bulge is featureless. Makes it look dishonest/unreal.

Furthermore, I dislike underwear that have a seam running down the middle. It tends to ruin the outline of your cock. If you buy sexy expensive underwear, it isn't because you want some large seam in the middle to ruin your outline.