Quote:
Originally Posted by Calboner  I had never heard that expression or its English cognate before, but this is what I found in the OED (Oxford English Dictionary on line):
So the leptosome is both thin and tall. I don't think, though, that there is much correlation between penis size and bodily height. There have been threads on the subject of small men with large penises. |
No correlation was ever found in a true "scientific study"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by superlarge Thundersplace has studied height vs penis length in detail and a correlation does exist on a mild to moderate level. Taller guys have a higher occurrence of long dicks and a lower occurrence of short dicks. The measurements are bone pressed and fatpad doesn't interfere with the results (in case taller guys tend to be thinner with less fatpad).
The average pubic fatpad is about 1 inch. Thin guys will naturally tend to have lesser fatpads and that leaves more visable dick showing. A thin guy may have only 1/4" fatpad, while heavy guys can have up to 2" and even more fatpad.
Height is correlated. Weight is correlated. If taller guys tend to have lesser fatpads then that will combine the correlated strengths of the two factors. |
I honestly don't think there is any correlation between penis size and having a thin body.
I'm 5'10.5" and weigh 165 Ibs I have a 33" waist... my penis size is below in my siggy
I believe we just tend to see more of the penis on a skinnier guy, but for the most part...I think all body types could have a large cock!
I know some men who are tall and skinny and have a 6.5-7" penis...and it looks small on them..but in all actuality, it is above average. However, I know other men who are 5'10 - 6'0" who are average... No scientifc study has ever found a link to height and body type to penis size or any body part.
They certainly do. 
LOL
