09-14-2007
|
#62 (permalink)
| | | [quote=mercurialbliss;1016035]Nothing you said on the other posts to SP, No_Strings, or Gillette showed anything resembling irony, only snarkiness, so your irony in your last post was shadowed by the nastiness of your previous comments. Sorry if my previous posts came across as nasty and I can see why their tone might influence you in interpreting the irony in my last post, but I did not intend to cast such a shadow.
[quote]
2. Never did I suggest that you have any need to emulate anyone. [quote]
[quote=patro78]
Perhaps Fair and Noble Ladies need to get out more and emulate the example of those women who are members of such sites. But, if they do (and good on them!), they forfeit the presumptive right to have their protestations of refined naivety taken with an entirely unsceptical good-naturedness. I do not need to know what verbosity means. My point was: if you are verbose, you are overblown: the words are virtually synonymous. I do not see any real (as oppopsed to merely verbal) distinction. You do not explain why my prose is verbose. You have simply reasserted your opinion that it is. I may have used a (relatively) large amount of words, but did I really express myself excessively, repetitively, redundantly? I needed to make a number of points, so i did. I tried to respond with the comprehensivess that the post I was responding to deserved. I think your reaction to my last post has been understandably influenced by your reactions to my previous posts: again apologies for the snarkiness. | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#63 (permalink)
| | | [quote=burns1de;1016036]Wow, this thread really brought out the best in people! Good work, Gillette. 
Good call! I've taken your admonition to heart  It's gotten pretty overheated in this thread, if not overblown! | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#64 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
patro78;1016049] Sorry if my previous posts came across as nasty and I can see why their tone might influence you in interpreting the irony in my last post, but I did not intend to cast such a shadow. | It makes much more sense now that you've detailed your intentions. Thank you for doing so. Quote: |
Originally Posted by patro78 You do not explain why my prose is verbose. You have simply reasserted your opinion that it is. I may have used a (relatively) large amount of words, but did I really express myself excessively, repetitively, redundantly? I needed to make a number of points, so i did. I tried to respond with the comprehensivess that the post I was responding to deserved. | Your "prose" appeared verbose because you were taking an inordinate amount of bandwidth to make a point or two and I thought you were being deliberately nasty, which would make your points moot, IMO. Now that you've explained yourself, I can read your words in a new light and gain new meaning. Quote: |
I think your reaction to my last post has been understandably influenced by your reactions to my previous posts: again apologies for the snarkiness.
| Apology gladly accepted. Clean slate?  | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#67 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by patro78  Totally clean | I can appreciate where you were coming from in the beginning, patro78. Yes, sometimes the pm's can get a little bit exhausting. I simply delete them, so they don't bother me, and I would not put them out on a public forum.
However, I understand how some of the other ladies here would get frustrated, especially when they have advised they are not interested and it continues or they receive nasty comments out of anger because some of the men feel rejected.
I also appreciate that you actually thought about your argument, whether members agreed or not, and that you were mature and friendly in setting aside the disagreement. There are those who cannot bring themselves to apologize, or to accept an apology, and move on..................
P.S. Just in case, there is no implication of doing so toward anyone in this thread. I am sure there are histories with some members, but I don't really know what they are. My statement is meant to imply "in general". | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#68 (permalink)
| | | On the topic of No_Bliss and Mercurial_Strings' experiment: Another fun experiment might be to create two identical (female) profiles, one with pictures, one without, and compare the quantity of PM's each receive. | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#69 (permalink)
| | | When you say anything worthy of a proper response then you'll get it Patro. You can whine and moan all you want but there is nothing that can justify a man sending this kind of message to a woman - this is one I received from someone with no photos, with no posting history and from a member I had never exchanged one word with. If you can't be anything but a stuck up cunt bitch, you don't deserve any guy to show you his package. As I don't ask guys to show me their package, neither do I ask them to cam I do wonder if this guy is actually insane. | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#70 (permalink)
| | | heres one that made me giggle..
im trying to get my question anwered by all girls, be glad if you could answer? if you do this?
whats the deal with girls swallowing cum? why do a lot of girls not want to do it but why do some want to do? does it feel good when he cums in your mouth, any tips on helping girls swallow better? thanks
read:do you swallow? lol | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#71 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by SpoiledPrincess When you say anything worthy of a proper response then you'll get it Patro. You can whine and moan all you want but there is nothing that can justify a man sending this kind of message to a woman - this is one I received from someone with no photos, with no posting history and from a member I had never exchanged one word with. If you can't be anything but a stuck up cunt bitch, you don't deserve any guy to show you his package. As I don't ask guys to show me their package, neither do I ask them to cam I do wonder if this guy is actually insane. |
I was not complaining that my posts were being ignored; didn't I explain that the reason I wrote a relatively long post (the length of which was, perhaps persuasively, citicised) was to offer a comprehensive response to a previous poster? I was attempting to spell out my reasons for diagreement, not "whine and moan". These reasons may or may not be convincing but at least I articulated them. I never suggested that the kind of messages about which you complain are ever justified;indeed I emphasised that that was not what I was claiming ("To be sure, I am not suggesting that anyone deserves to receive the kind of messages to which so many people have taken objection in this thread"). Rather, I said that, if you are a member of a site such as LPSG, such messages cannot be wholly unanticipated. Of course, if a messager is persistently harrassing you then surely this is serious enough to alert a moderator. If a message falls short of harrassment and is crude, overly-forward or offensive to you, then my position would be: ignore it. But I can certainly see how it would be frustrating to receive such messages constantly, especially if they are from vindicitve correspondents whose advances have been ignored or rejected. I should have restricted my comments to messages which are not intentionally nasty, vindictive and harassing. | | | |
| |
09-14-2007
|
#72 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by wldhoney I can appreciate where you were coming from in the beginning, patro78. Yes, sometimes the pm's can get a little bit exhausting. I simply delete them, so they don't bother me, and I would not put them out on a public forum.
However, I understand how some of the other ladies here would get frustrated, especially when they have advised they are not interested and it continues or they receive nasty comments out of anger because some of the men feel rejected. Yes, I should have recognised this.
I also appreciate that you actually thought about your argument, whether members agreed or not, and that you were mature and friendly in setting aside the disagreement. There are those who cannot bring themselves to apologize, or to accept an apology, and move on.................. Thanks. I think mercurial derserved an apology; I began my contribution in a spirit of hostility, which is always wrong.
P.S. Just in case, there is no implication of doing so toward anyone in this thread. I am sure there are histories with some members, but I don't really know what they are. My statement is meant to imply "in general". | Yes, I should also have initially made the same qualification. | | | |
| |
09-15-2007
|
#73 (permalink)
| | | Here is a beauty: u are amazing baby very sexy and hot
would u like cam 2 cam show
i have a big cock | | | |
| |
09-15-2007
|
#74 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by diamond Here is a beauty: u are amazing baby very sexy and hot
would u like cam 2 cam show
i have a big cock | See, it's stuff like this that makes me wonder if we shouldn't still be living in caves.
Me Og big cock. You pretty Ooka. Og and Ooka go cave. Much sex ( grunt, scratch). | | | |
| |
09-15-2007
|
#75 (permalink)
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jason_els See, it's stuff like this that makes me wonder if we shouldn't still be living in caves.
Me Og big cock. You pretty Ooka. Og and Ooka go cave. Much sex (grunt, scratch). | What are you talking about? That's the stuff that gets my motor running.
It helps if I envision them dragging their knuckles on the floor behind them.  | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |