LPSG Members: become part of the solution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Donna Goldstein of New York http://www.lpsg.org/images36/buttons/viewpost.gif
I agree with Rawbone regarding steps in discipline. I don't.

1. Written warning
2. Written warning of possible suspension
3. Short Term Suspension
4. Long Term Suspension
5. Written Warning of possible banning
6. Short Term Banning
7. Permanent Banning

Nope, disagreed that is WAY TOO many chances for a troll or a fake picture poster. In this instance I see no reason why it can't be 3 strikes and you are out. Allowing these fools 6 chances is ridiculous and will only serve to encourage their inappropriate behavior.


The six chances are too many if we are talking about a situation covering a few weeks over the same issue.

I would rewrite the first one to be optional and be called a call down by a mod, not an official warning. These could be given several times over time. Example: "You are getting over the line on this thread, cool down a bit. OK!"

These kind of messages either on the thread or in private message should not count as part of the banning process.

I would change that to

1. Official warning
2. Suspention (while the details are being sorted out by the mods and then made clear to the member by the mods after their discussion, but no fuirhter action being taken at this point in time. The member can still read and send pms, but can't post on the board on be in the chat room.)

This could also be a disciplinary action in and of itself.

3. Temp ban (Done in cases where the problem is not as severe and their is hope for change in behavior.) This could be a week or a month and in cases of underage until they reach the age of 18.

4. Permanent ban When other options have not worked.

This is basically the three strikes your out except for the suspention which may be a part of the temp ban or permanent ban process.

maybe up the number of pics that can be posted when someone has been an active member on their anniversary or let them have access to other features during their anniversary month....obviously provided some content to the site and have never been banned,

Well, as an avid lover of large penis, I would like to see more options for large or small meetings among members, so to speak. Although I enjoy the discussion and the photos, I'm more of an "in your face" kind of guy...if you catch my drift.

Begging again for a specific forum area for all the "rate my cock! boost my ego!" threads so they can be contained in one area....that i can then ignore....

I don't think it's a mistake that the people who make rude comments NEVER have a gallery or a profile. IMHO if you can't be bothered to show and tell as I and many others do you should not be allowed into chat, nor should you be allowed to post gallery comments.

It's cowardice combined with hatefulness that makes such comments so hurtful.

I would disagree with this to a degree. I have no pics up, yes I have looked at others pics (usually to know what the person I am talking to looks like, and yes I do share my pic out to people I have become comfortable with). I do agree that the trolls who come on for the sole purpose of bashing on the women or men for that matter should put up or shut up, but please don't penalize those of us just getting our courage up to post and who rarely have an unkind word for anyone... OK, maybe the occasional bad hair day.

That is an excellent point! I shouldn't have made such a broad sweeping generalization.

I still feel the people who troll through chat or go out of their way to make inappropriate gallery comments should receive a warning. . . especially if they haven't filled out their profile or provided pics.

That is VERY true and i am all for it.

BTW, you are having an exceptionally good hair day.

I think action such as that should be taken regardless of whether they've "filled out their profile or provided pics." Profile and pics are largely irrelevant since either can be falsified.

Why thank you, kind sir.

njqt466,

Those eyes of yours in your avatar are so beautiful. Work it girl!

I have a problem with Blogboardbusters claiming that he works for BBB and is paid to come in here and bash people.

didn't he get banned anyway?

I was directed here, after posting this in its own thread. :x

"This isn't a big issue, just more of a convenience thing. Would the mods ever split the adult websites forum into 2 subgroups? (Striaght and gay) I personally don't like seeing any naked females when looking for porn. x.x; Not everyone labels what's in the videos."

I'd like to know when all of my brilliant suggestions will be implemented :)