Why are Gay Men seemingly obsessed with uncut cock?

I'm afro-brasilian, been in the states since I was 3. I am not circumcised because it is not given in Brasil unless it is necessary or requested electively. A friend thinks that a lot of guys are into me just because i'm uncut. So I have been asking friends randomly what they prefer and they mostly say uncut guys. Why? It doesn't operate differently than a cut cock. I don't get the obsession.

Well, actually it does operate slightly differently than a cut cock. But I'd be into you because you're Afro-Brasilian, not because you're uncut.

I would be soooo into you because of your descent and you being uncut. I spend a lot of times browsing in pages with well hung uncut Brazilians. I love an uncut cock because of the fun I have with a long foreskin.
What´s your size anyways? just curious, lol!

Guys like all kinds of different things. Many love uncut, many don't.

I do think a little bit of an uncut 'fad" started in the U.S. when Bel Ami started featuring Eastern European models in their porn after he Soviet bloc fell apart.

If you mean in the U.S. the major religious influence calls for it making it "supposedly" rare, thus desirable. I'm like you. I could care less cut or not In a condom they have a smilar* feel. ouyside is a completly different story, but I've never ventured to find out.

Assuming one barebacks (less trouble, more consiquence) uncut is supposedly has less friction. Say what you will but I get enough rejection for being me that I've heard all the stories, myths, and excuses.

spaox : Uncut is a little different. Among anumber of other things, it's a smoother ride for whoever you are nailing - less friction as bryan said - but that goes for with a condom too. The condom poses it's own set of issues for the uncut guys. Ultimately though, there is not really big difference.
It does work either way.

Bryan: Only a small percent of circumcised men (who are the majority in the US) were circumcised for religious reasons. I don't understand what you were talking about. Circumcision is common in America, while religious circumcision in America is compartively rare.

My preference is not an obsession, I just am not a big fan of body modification.

My big objection to circumcision is when it's performed on infants who cannot consent to having it done.

I think that uncut cocks are fewer in this country than cut cocks. So, I think part of this is fantasizing over what you don't have yourself. It's something I wanted to try because I'm cut (American Jew). So once I did it with a guy with an uncut cock, I felt that I like all cocks both cut and uncut and for different reasons.

As an aside, the latest studies are showing that circumcised men are less at risk for contracting HIV and other STDs. Also women who have sex with uncut men have a higher rate of cervical cancer. There are cancers of the foreskin that get eliminated when a penis is circumsized.

For me the number one reason I would get a boy circumsized is for the spiritual reasons outlined by Jewish Law. I would want my sons to fully partipate in the Covenant and the Community. It's a practice that sets our people apart. The lack of a foreskin reminds us every time we look at our penises or play with them, we are a member of something larger than ourselves. This is a very personal decision for each family. These are my thoughts on this subject.

The problem I have is with people who are completely obsessed with uncut cocks. I was talking to someone online a while back and he was just COMPLETELY repulsed that my cock was cut. The problem is that I didn't really have a choice in the matter.

I think you are DEFINATELY onto something here. Most women are satisfied with their partner's penis cut vs uncut or long vs. short.

In America it is quite normal to be circumzised, therfore an uncut gay is seen as something exotic and attractive. In Europe it is the other way round, here very few guys are cut, therefore it is considered as something very intriguing and sexy.

Maybe Im biased coz Im uncut too, but I definitely think cut and uncut cocks operate sooooooo differently, you can do so much more with a uncut penis, play with the foreskin etc. Also wanking a uncut cock is different as the skin moves so makes it a lot easier, and a cut cock, especially a tight one, it is hard to wank without lube, so rather than moving the foreskin up and down, is more like 'rubbing' it. A uncut penis usually still have the frenum attached which is the best bit ever for stimulation, and uncut's head is so much smoother and sensitive, most cut penises doesn't have the frenun anymore, and also the head dries up like a prune, making it 'old' looking.

Also I don't really like scars, I get squeamish about it, and to seeing a cut cock, to me its like seeing a scared penis, its really not too appealing to me. I'm glad I lived in a country where most people don't get it cut, so its very rare that I come across with someone with a cut one

there is no preference for this among the gay guys i know; the title of the topic is not correct imho. personal preference is cut actually, but it's not a strong preference. most guys i have been with are "sliced", and am cool with that. EVERYONE i saw in the shower in hs and college and at the gym are circ, but this is the usa.

As far as I know, gay males are not obsessed with uncut cock. I've had both cut and uncut and have enjoyed each of them. On the other hand, the foreign accent would be a major turn on for me.