Smallest ever> - gay guys only

How many of you have been with a cute guy you rejected b/c he was too small? what were the details? was he just short or short and thin? How many inches exactly would you say and around? Big or small balls?

why can only gays guys answer this?

Snoozan: thanks for asking that.

Hellohottie: I've never rejected anyone because of the size of their dick. Maybe because they didn't know what to do with their dick, but not because of the size of it.

I've had a couple of fantastic, very-fondly-rememberedlovers in the past who were both between the 3" and 4" mark; neither of them was in the least self-conscious, and so things were just wonderful, in particular

As you'll see, that ends half-way through a sentence, but as I describe myself at LPSG as being only 90% gay, I had to edit out the final 10% of my reply.

Oh come on. Post the rest.

sorry for gay guys only - i think we are different than women - women start your own thread ok? guys tell your stories.

No. Never. If the penis was all I was interested in, I wouldn't bother with having anything attached. That's what dildos are for.

I cannot say I have ever rejected a man for size. I have been with small and large and several in between sizes and size was not the deciding factor. Personality kept a relationship going for a few years with a man who was barely 4 inches long. Of course he was a tasty treat and knew what to do with what he did have--and he had talented tongue and fingers as well! He was just beyond 5 inches in girth and had 2 fairly average sized testicles--and he was uncircumcised (figured I'd answer before that question appeared). We parted ways, and I went fully queer and he went fully straight (balanced out the universe I suppose) and has 2 children so apparently his wife found him functional as well.

Zero.

One of the best 'tops' I ever had an affair with was 4" on a good day. I could actually suck his cock AND balls at the same time.

I'm far more likely to reject some well hung guy for too much attitude.

This is total horseshit. There are many gay me on the site who participate in the women's forum threads (and are welcome to). The last time I checked, we didn't get to pick and choose who responded to our posts. As far as gay men being different, why does it matter? When it comes down to it, it's a hole and a penis, and both are qualified to answer.

Which I'll do. I was with two men who were in the small to smallish side, and both of them were very open and willing to experiement sexually-- more than anyone else I've been with. Neither one of the were self-concious at all. The bonus of them being so open to anything was that we were never limited to what we used in bed so I didn't feel deprived of size. Dildos, hands, food, more weren't off limits. We could concentrate on other things aside from just cock and pussy. And, it was a lot easier to have anal sex with them than other partners because of their size, which was great.

Whoops, did reading that make you lose your erection?

And that brings me back to my main point: if the penis is the entire deciding factor, isn't that what dildos are for? They are the perfect size that you choose, go exactly where you want them when you want them there, and move at the perfect speed. A dildo does exactly what you want, and you don't even have to tell it to. Why bother with a cock, which is attached to a man, and your only (imperfect) interface is his brain?

I did have a chance encounter with a 1.5" dick... was perfecrly shaped, but a doll's penis.... I did not reject, because that would have just been rude... actually gave him a nice blow-job.

Could I have had an LTR with him? Never.

I have had a relationship with someone 4.5" long ... He was an amazing top and was constantly finding new ways to make me moan.

I'm a total anal top, have no talent whatsoever for bottoming. It's not in my comfort zone. The man's size is completely irrelevant to me in that regard.

I love sucking cock, though. And although I'm up for any challenge presented, much prefer avg/small uncut dicks in my mouth. My online hook-up profiles actually specify this.

From a mental perspective, being able to dominate a bottom and control the situation is possible with any consenting submissive, but a small-hung submissive scores points for me, just as my larger penis does for him.

Hellohottie: Gay men are different from women, but that doesn't mean we can't learn from one another. By closing your mind to the experiences of people different from yourself, you're choosing to swim in the shallow end.

In my case, the smallest-hung guy (I didn't measure him, but my thumb was bigger) I've ever been with turned out to also be the most inconsiderate and vain; it was an easy choice for me to reject him. I've never found a guy that I considered "too small". I learned long ago that when I find someone who can put up with my odd, irritating issues, not to look that gift horse in the basket.

Couldn't agree more.