Princes' circumcision

[King] Albert was German.

Who cares? lol

Albert was only British Royal by his marriage to Queen Victoria. He was German

Whatever.

Circumcision is also a traditional with the members of the Spanish Royal Family, so I assume the Crown Prince Felipe is circumcised.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let's just play nice.

until the day when willy or harry flop it out and let everyone have a look, we will never know!

But wouldn't that be a WONDERFUL day!

It's not a judgement of a population, it's a judgement of an unnecessary act.
There are no medical reasons for doing it to a normal penis, and considering that about 1 in 1000 circumcisions go wrong and cause damage, it's better not to do it.

I thought I'd read that it is believed that circumcision reduces the chances of HIV transmission in Africa. That sounds like a pretty compelling medical reason to err on the side of caution and have it done. Besides its generally more hygienic.

In my personal judgment, a circumcised penis is much more aesthetically pleasing in appearance, at least in its flaccid state.

If I had little boys, I wouldn't listen to the "poor little boys, they lost their foreskin", crowd; I'd say "tough shit".

I think guys who are "mourning" the loss of their foreskin should get over it. They can still get plenty of pleasure from their cocks.

On a side note, I finally figured out several years ago why some guys use the public restroom stall to piss rather than the latrine. Its so they can clean their uncircumcised cocks after they've pissed. This because I noticed guys using toilet tissue after a stand-up leak.

circumsision rates in the uk run at around a mere 15%
mostly due to religious traditions {jewish/muslim traditions}

i can assure you that they manage to pee at urinals, wash twice a day and look pretty damn good.
no, they don't need to clean after a pee...they have these amazing things called "hands", which they can use to hold the shaft, pulling back slighly, exposing the tip as they aim. a one-hand-move that they seem to make with no effort at all.
amazing shit!

if someone uses being cut as a reason not to practice safe sex & personal hygiene then i don't want to know them! *shudder*

There are disputed studies that suggest it reduces the chance of female-to-male sexual transmission. Big deal.For adults deciding for themselves, maybe. If a guy wants to whack off his foreskin based on those disputed studies, fine, that's his stupid decision. It doesn't apply to infants, however.That's fine, but in the next sentence ...You're saying you'd impose you aesthetic preference upon them and to Hell with their right to body integrity? I hope you don't have male children.For anyone who's cut there isn't much choice other than to "get over it". What me and others who don't like it can do is: help prevent it from being done to tomorrows men.Are you a wannabe Sociologist? Here's some behavioral data for you: intact men usually retract their foreskins when they pee. Flow from said penises is similar to cut penises. You're research is flawed.

Scar tissue is attractive?

Why do you feel it's your right to make that decision? Because it was forced on you?

You obviously have no empathy for those who've lost the use of their penis due to idiot surgeons. What would you do if that happened to your son? Tough shit!

Your ignorance is amazing. All guys would do well to wipe their dicks with a bit of paper after they pee.