Quote:
Originally Posted by Love-it  At 6.25" I had to pick the 5.9-6.2" range because I didn't want to be accused of stretching the truth into the 6.3+" range. |
Same here.
At maximum hardness, I'm 6,3"-6,4" at the base, but overall, I prefer to represent the high end of 5,9"-6,2".
It seems that both length- and widthwise, I represent the average of our little club, as 6,9"-7,4" so far looks like the average length.
I'm really in the same position when it comes to length. Bone-pressed, measured along the upper curve, I am 7,5-ish, but I prefer to call myself a
genuine 7-incher(18cm at LEAST).
Hell, when I joined, my perception was that my penis was only about 6,5"; as it curves SIGNIFICANTLY upwards(I was also
far from bonepressing). But when I realized that at 90% hardness(or thereabouts), which leaves my penis to point almost straight out, I was
very close to 7", I realized that I had in fact misrepresented myself.
I'm ranting again, I know, but I find it UNFAIR that those with DOWNWARD curved erections should be allowed to submit their upper curve measurements, as we with UPWARD curves aren't allowed to submit our lower ones.
My lower curve is no less than 8".
Not much more either, I must admit.
I realize that the flaw of my argument, is that there really is no bone to measure from at the underside.
I tiny flaw.
