Quote:
|
The board can be accessed by anyone, even a lurker, without signing in, so a teen would be able to read the board and see avatars, so should nudity be prohibited there?
|
Montey has a great point with the above statement. Even if all minors (I hate to say teen since 18-19 are legal) were banned, there's no "You must be 18 to enter this site" link that keeps minors who are guests from seeing nudity in the avatars.
Personally, I think that not only porn should be banned, but nudity as well. Isn't it against the law for minors to view nudity period even if it isn't porn? Playboy isn't porn (there's no sexual acts nor penetration) but yet you must be 18 to buy it.
Part of me says that teens should be allowed to say...but perhaps raise the age to 15/16 and above for maturity sake. I'm just guessing that if a teen truly needs large penis support, that's about the time in their life that they are starting to have issues with it. Of course I realize that I could be wrong.
I also agree that they should be banned from the gallery. Is there a way to make a "group" of their own and keep that group banned from even the 5 free views a day from the gallery? Then once they hit 18, they could be moved into the Member (or Gold Member) group and have those viewing pleasures again.