LPSG.ORG

Saddam set to become a swinger

Saddam sentenced to death This is hardly a surprise of course. There is a lengthy (potentially open ended) automatic appeals process and a further verdict to come so he may end up a double swinger.

is part of a discussion in the Et Cetera, Et Cetera forum that includes topics on Off-topic postings, current events, rants and raves....


Go Back   LPSG.ORG > Et Cetera, Et Cetera

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-05-2006   #1 (permalink)
dong20 is offline
Saddam set to become a swinger

Saddam sentenced to death

This is hardly a surprise of course. There is a lengthy (potentially open ended) automatic appeals process and a further verdict to come so he may end up a double swinger.

Never mind that Bush/Blair will no doubt try to milk it for electoral/political advantage and that this may go down well in the west. But with rival groups voicing their views on the streets and violence already could it kick the ongoing insurgence into overdrive?

Conspiracists will no doubt say the verdict (and the timing of it's announcement) were engineered for this purpose.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #2 (permalink)
SpeedoGuy is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by dong20 View Post
Conspiracists will no doubt say the verdict (and the timing of it's announcement) were engineered for this purpose.
The timing is a bit curious, eh?
 
Old 11-05-2006   #3 (permalink)
ORCABOMBER is offline

Amazing that we've killed at least 100 times the number that Saddam is being hanged for, just to get to him.

Good riddance. Now, should be interesting who his replacement is.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #4 (permalink)
hearst is offline

It is also interesting that he wasn't tried for any of his big crimes. ie. the ones which would implicate western governments, who were his accomplices.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #5 (permalink)
mercurialbliss is offline

Unreal...disappointed because it's not the "force of unity" they were hoping for. What are they thinking? Encouraging families to pack picnic lunches and bring the kids to watch him hang?.... Seriously, I don't know why they're surprised and disappointed. It's not like Bush/Blair had the UN or the rest of the world backing them on their decision to invade or continue the war. Many are happy to see Saddam get his come uppance, but others are equally unhappy at the measures taken to get to this point.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #6 (permalink)
WessexEN is offline

As I've always said, there would of been a better way to solve this conflict with using little arms as possible.
In fact, in theory, we should of been able to kill 200 times less than our current casualty figure, to get Saddam, but thats my opinon.

I also have stronger views on the conflict, but I won't go into any detail here, as it would be far too political and inappropiate.


Lets just hope this appeal and the killing if there is one, is over and done quickly so that we can get the new democratic leader in place and restoring peace to iraq.
(My facts maybe a little out of date, please do correct me if I am wrong.)
 
Old 11-05-2006   #7 (permalink)
flamer_on is offline

Set to become a swinger...

man alive, thats the funniest pun title I have read in a long long time!! Still laughing now!
 
Old 11-05-2006   #8 (permalink)
rob_just_rob is offline

The victors get to try the losers. Same as it ever was.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #9 (permalink)
Onslow is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by dong20 View Post
Never mind that Bush/Blair will no doubt try to milk it for electoral/political advantage and that this may go down well in the west. But with rival groups voicing their views on the streets and violence already could it kick the ongoing insurgence into overdrive?
And then you said--

Quote:
Originally Posted by dong20 View Post
Conspiracists will no doubt say the verdict (and the timing of it's announcement) were engineered for this purpose.

Starting with you apparently.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #10 (permalink)
wi_sugargrl is offline

Good riddance I say! It's just too bad he wasn't killed in Desert Storm, then maybe some of the current fighting could have been avoided. Who knows.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #11 (permalink)
hot-rod is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by hearst View Post
It is also interesting that he wasn't tried for any of his big crimes. ie. the ones which would implicate western governments, who were his accomplices.
Say what? say that again.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #12 (permalink)
big dirigible is offline
Banned

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob_just_rob View Post
The victors get to try the losers. Same as it ever was.
And you have some more appropriate legal venue in mind? He should be tried by the losers, perhaps?
 
Old 11-05-2006   #13 (permalink)
rob_just_rob is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by big dirigible View Post
And you have some more appropriate legal venue in mind? He should be tried by the losers, perhaps?
Don't be naive.

This "trial" was as much of a foregone conclusion as Goering's. Or Tojo's. Or Milosevic's, assuming he had lived through it.

You could make a pretty good case for hanging Arthur Harris, William Westmoreland and Donald Rumsfeld, had they worked for the losing side instead of the winning side.

One of the perks of winning a war is that the winners get to put the loser's leaders on trial, despite the fact that leaders on both sides did equally heinous acts.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #14 (permalink)
dong20 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onslow View Post
And then you said--


Starting with you apparently.
Plant a seed and watch it grow.
 
Old 11-05-2006   #15 (permalink)
dong20 is offline

Quote:
Originally Posted by big dirigible View Post
And you have some more appropriate legal venue in mind? He should be tried by the losers, perhaps?
Given that it could be argued that the biggest losers in the 'war' where the Iraqi people perhaps that's not a million miles from what's happened.
 

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.

Latest Threads

Latest Posts

Latest Blogs


Copyright 1999-2008 LPSG.ORG

SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7