Quote:
Originally Posted by WessexEN 1) In theory, we should of been able to kill 200 times less than our current casualty figure, to get Saddam, but thats my opinon. 2) I also have stronger views on the conflict, but I won't go into any detail here, as it would be far too political and inappropiate. |
1) Why 200 in particular? And how could this be achieved, whatever the figure, if the one you gave was only suggestive? Can you expand? (I'm interested.)
2) Why not? Can hardly be far too political and inappropriate here.