These conversations just keep getting dumber and dumber. I actually enjoy the spoof posts the most lately because at least they have a reason to be written. The problem as I see it, is that people who wish to identify with the "right wing" think that makes it acceptable to condemn others' lives and that their condemnations should br treated as civil conversation to be respected and given equal time. No one ever says "We should make Christianity illegal", NO! EVERYONE on the left says it's great that Christians have their faith, they just should not be able to IMPOSE it as our legal system. Why is this so fucking hard to understand?

I don't give a flying fuck what you think or how you feel, for whatever your reasons you decide it's within your rights to make decisions about other people's lives that don't concern you, I will call you an idiot. I will laugh at you and make fun of your insecurities, I'm well within my rights to do so. I can't pass legislation against you so a little tawdry taunting is the only relief I get.

I will also assert my personal belief that right wingers have more homophobia and violence in their group than those who enjoy more liberal views. It's not a fact, just my opinion, but probably someone has done a study on it. As I see it, it's the age old question of brain vs. braun. My guns vs. your writing. Not too tough for me to figure out which group to associate with, nor it is hard to figure out who falls where after a ten minute conversation.