Do gays prefer uncut and straights prefer cut?

Sorry to burden you all with another cut/uncut poll but I read something that made me wonder whether gays prefer uncut cocks but straights prefer (obviously in a very different way) cut cocks. I'm talking about other guys' cocks, not your own. So which do you find more attractive, less likely to gross you out etc?
I fit this pattern, would be interested to see if others do.

too few results so far, but so far it looks true that gays prefer uncut

It might be nice if you could share what this source was, since there's obviously a huge difference between an academic treatise using a sample of 2000 respondents, and the latest piece of piss published by some glossy magazine. And where was it published ... in a majority-cut land like the US, or in a majority-uncut European nation?

Trying to quantify personal preference and apply it to an entire social group smacks of sweeping generalization at best, anyway.

None of the poll choices accurately describe my feelings on this issue, so I didn't vote. I do prefer intact, but simply because I prefer as few alterations as possible. I am intact, and my partner is cut. I like the natural look, too, as far as other body modifications go. I prefer natural skin over inked or heavily pierced, natural-looking hair (or bald) over heavily gelled, and naturally sculpted bodies over steroid-laden muscles and veins.

I know several straight women who have the same point of view as mine. No aversion to a circumcised cock, but they prefer a natural, intact one.

For what it's worth, I like a more natural look for women, too - less makeup is better.

It's easy to write something to prove your point. My article could be called:
Gays Prefer Uncut Cock 2 to 1!

For me, I like cock.

I must agree ! Whether it is better cut or uncut depends on all the other aspects and attributes of cleanliness, smell , texture, facility , accessibility , function , form and so forth which are secondary to and associated with cut/uncut status! Obviously , some cocks are beautiful when cut, and others are marvelous left untouched!

I'm English and resided there until 7 years ago, when i moved to NYC. So i've had plenty of experience of both cut and uncut. And I do prefer uncut.

It's what I grew up with, what I always assumed was normal. It feels better in my mouth, and gives me more to play with.

That's not to say I'd turn down a guy just for being circumcized. I'm not quite that shallow. If he's hot, circ status is totally irrelevant. But all other things being equally attractive, I would probably choose uncut over cut.

How about Im straight therfore I dont care.

Enough replies now to see that there is no trend whatsoever. (Hang around the site a bit longer and it will become clear that all gay men don't agree on anything, let along cut/uncut preference.

Ah, good to see Ben is still his usual charming self.

Well how exactly can you ask a straight man if he prefers cut or uncut dicks?

Thats you being asked if you like hairy or hairless pussies

from a purely visual standpoint, i think ladies look better when they don't
mow the grass totally off. even tho it ain't my thang.

ya didn't have to participate in the poll or thread ben if it wasn't your style. i'd probably avoid a long discussion and poll about muff myself.

yeah really.....how about straight guys prefer pussy?? not cocks.

Thanks for your responses, folks.
For the record, I read it on-line in a random blog I stumbled on so it has no cred whatsoever. It sounded unlikely to be right to me (and at any rate the sort of rule that has so many exceptions as to be fairly worthless) but that it would be worth taking to the experts.