Quote:
|
Originally Posted by big dirigible Is there a random-text generator which will crank out stuff like this? I know of one which generates pretty good complaint letters... |
People generally have strong views about Ms. Yoeslin. I assume you already know that Yoeslin sees anti-intellectualism as her benevolent guardian angel, but I have something more important to tell you. If we listen to others, then the sea of oligarchism, on which she so heavily relies, will begin to dry up.
Yoeslin reads magazines that feature the disrespect, degradation, dehumanization, and exploitation of women and their bodies. (Actually, things that you or I might regard as insolent or politically incorrect might be considered by Yoeslin's legates as an article of faith, a philosophical conviction, a political opinion, or even an innocuous form of entertainment but that's not important now.) I may not be perfect, but at least I'm not afraid to say that the next time she decides to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture, she should think to herself,
cui bono? -- who benefits? Yoeslin has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. She can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches Yoeslin's nostrils, she'll start talking about the joy of neocolonialism and how she is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. As you listen to Yoeslin's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice her hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Will peeling back the onion of her uppity, snooty philosophies cause her to shed tears or will it merely enhance her desire to extract obscene salaries and profits from corporations that spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness?" The answer is obvious if you understand that her snotty cajoleries are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of isolationism are blooming all around us.
If Yoeslin's loyalists had even an ounce of integrity, they would bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. Because we have the determination to see the truth prevail, we must never forget that Yoeslin is always prating about how Marxism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions. (She used to say that nativism and nonrepresentationalism are identical concepts, but the evidence is too contrary, so she's given up on that score.) While there's no use crying over spilled milk, she wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving her lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well, because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment, or is it sufficient to do something good for others? This is an important question because now that I've been exposed to Yoeslin's ruses, I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps Yoeslin decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that she fears, because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.
Yoeslin's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. She doesn't want the details checked. She doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts she presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of her "facts" are false. Don't get me wrong; Yoeslin's worshippers do not concern themselves much with the people around them. But if I may be so bold, we ought to free people from the fetters of demagogism's poisonous embrace. That'll make Yoeslin think once -- I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that she has previously given any thought to the matter -- before trying to challenge all I stand for.
Yoeslin sometimes has trouble convincing people that she has a "special" perspective on unilateralism which carries with it a "special" right to scorn and abjure reason. When she has such trouble, she usually trots out a few offensive, lazy converts to scapegoatism to constate authoritatively that my bitterness at Yoeslin is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. Whether or not that trick of hers works, it's still the case that I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Yoeslin's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. Her idiotic claim that sin is good for the soul is just that, an idiotic claim. That's all I'm going to say in this letter, because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
The penis of the god "Príapo" (A too long flaccid penis). 
And this was such a good one.
