I think anyone else that was in the top 2-3 of the hunt for each party's nomination for either side would've done far better than Bush in the 2 administrations he's had.
Domestically, Bush's tax breaks only proved one thing, rampant inflation is the rule when you announce people will have more money in their hands, it becomes a mad rush for the wolves/sharks to get to it first. Then when those wolves/sharks don't back off, it becomes a feeding frenzy on those that are working class, is it any wonder you wind up with exactly what we have right now.
And in case anyone asks, I don't think 9/11/2001 happens if Bush isn't our President. That's not to say the plan wouldn't be there/attempted by the terrorists, I think the continuity of transition from Clinton to Gore would've been better than the disruption that Clinton to Bush was. Bush wasn't and still isn't qualified to be leader of this nation, regardless of the number of votes in his favor. |