Bigger is better... simple math

Stud Hunter... 40-50 ratio?
That sounds so intriguing. Could you further expound on that?

Not a ratio, just a range. I like 'em big but I have a limit. I'd say length/girthwise once you get to like 8.5X6 that's about as big as I want. My ideal is about 7-8 in. long by 5-6 in. around (rough estimate of course). If it's much bigger than that I find it uncomfortable.

A woman talking about enjoying big men and math...

My heart's all a-flutter.

The math is definately correct but other factors are also important. Most women, after a size being decent put much rating on hardness. Also too is stamina. What good is a big cock that lasts a few minutes. Lots of ingredients but your math is right but there is more to great sex than that.

Yup! We men are so shallow!

I think volume is a better indicator of size - pi * dia^2/4 x length (dia =circumference/pi). So it takes a really long one to give as much volume as a thick one...sigh....

Yup, there's plenty that matters other than just dick size. Stamina is a big one for me. I like a guy who can stay hard a long time, in fact to me that's at least as important as size. Hardness is nice too, since I think it feels best when the guy is steel hard. Of course skill plays a big role too.

Ever think of using displacement?

[quote=gg42]Yup! We men are so shallow!quote]

But we don't want shallow women.

That is a sexy concept.

On the mathematical issue:

Length x girth works, nearly. To make your calculations perfect, you'd have to calculate the surface of the head too, but I guess that would require some advanced mathematical methods and some computer power to do so, because it's really irregular. Since the penis is no cylinder, the top and bottom surface don't have to be counted, or do you guys have soda-can-shaped penises now, which are detached from your bodies? The interpretation is somewhat tricky. Length and girth have domains, limited by nature's possibilities. I guess if we did some in-depth research, we would find a girth/length ratio, which would simplify the calculation, and then we could make full use of the surface formula.

Still, I try to keep mathematics out of my bedroom. Stretching is great, as long as it isn't too hard, and maximum friction between me at my best-comfortable stretch and a guy fully in will be maximum pleasure, calculated or not.

Wouldn't volume actually be a better measurement to use?

<3<3<3

Also, while I do so hate to nit-pick (ha-ha), this thread has hardly proved in any way that bigger is better. All it's done is prove bigger is . . . well, bigger. And actually, we already knew that. So it hasn't proved anything.

One thing I think it does is prove that we are "deep thinkers" because we really try to rationalize things that aren't rational.

Feelings and wants can rarely be quantitatively measured. It's what you want because you want it, and that's fine with me.


As a matter of fact, I would rather a person "want" something for the pure sake of wanting it than some rational decision making process. It's all about being happy, and that's all I have to say about that.

(It is cool that we have an intellectual side to our nature though.)

Almost as nice as your cock, Shelby.