As for the question 'who's the biggest?', it's a natural question for people to ask, and I don't think we should be too harsh on people who ask it, although it does get a bit tedious when it's asked over and over again. A lot of people are very interested in superlatives - after all, the Guinness Book of Records has been one of the best selling book titles for decades. While this is primarily supposed to be a support group, cocks of 12", 13", 14" and more are so far outside the normal experience of most people that of course they are curious and are going to ask to see them or ask about the biggest.
However, in the past too many people here have made too many wild claims about their size...without any evidence whatever to back it up. Sometimes there have been random cock pics, over-enthusiastic photo-shoppers, mysterious bulging outlines in clothing, etc. When challenged they go into a hissy fit, complain about victimisation and bemoan the fact that this is supposed to be a support group, etc, etc. Well, I could claim that I've run 100m in 6.5 seconds - I could argue that I don't have to prove it to anyone because I KNOW I've done it, and that you should support me because I'm a fellow member here...all of which is nonsense of course.
While I think we should be able to take members on trust (but this is the internet) I don't think it's unreasonable for guys to be able to verify their claims. The idea that pics should be validated in some way isn't unreasonable, with most people having digital cameras it's pretty simple to take and post a new pic. I think the validation of pics has been a big improvement, and personally I wouldn't let people submit pics that aren't validated in some way. One thing I've noticed though is that all those hundreds of guys over 12 inches are noticible by their absence when it comes to validated pics.
So if guys are attacked for making exaggerated claims then there is one way to silence their critics - just provide some kind of validated evidence.
cheers
Dillon | 
