Mr. Geechee, let me add my two cents for all it is worth....
I am now 19 and live in Greece. When I was younger like 13-16 guys used to talk about losing your virginity, which not only meant having intercourse but also "breaking" your virginity and I had never understood what they were talking about (I mean with the "breaking" part, the intercourse part I understood:) ), anyway, I came to realise that they were talking about the frenelum breaking which happened to some of them. Don't know why, but it has never happened to me.........
Next, I have a cousin who was born here and went to the USA as a baby. At a very young age he was circumcised to "fit in" with his peers later on.
He has visited us many times here and expresses wishes that he had never been circumcised. Of course he has no memories of being uncut, but complains about not having "instant access" to masturbaton if you will, and just the thought of being mutilated as he sees it as well.
I also believe that having a foreskin adds extra thickness to the penis. I may be wrong, but in doing some comparing, the rod may be the same, but my uncut penis is thicker because of the foreskin. Does that make any sense? It may be just a few mm of a cm but I think it can be felt by the women. Plus the extra sensation posted by Ms. Lulu all makes sense. There is extra motion going on in there when there is a foreskin, isn't there?
I hope I won't get bombed for my comments, just expressing my views.
thanks |