prepstudinsc: I'm cut and I am glad that it was done. I think that a cut penis looks better. I've only seen a few uncut ones at my gym and they look pretty gross. I'm a germaphobe (is that a word? lol) and the thought of bacteria breeding and festering under a foreskin just repulses me. If I was uncut, I would have to wash myself everytime I went to the bathroom. It would just be too labor intensive. My college roomate was uncut and during our junior year he had to be circumsised due to phimosis. He told me that while it was painful for a little while, he was glad that he had it done because he's much happier being cut.

I think it goes back to the old "grass is greener on the other side of the fence" adage. We always want what we don't have....dark haired people want to be blonde (just look at all the women who bleach their hair), hairy men want to be smooth, smooth men want some hair, etc. I have a good friend who has very little hair on his chest and his biggest complaint about how he looks is that he's not hairy.

My point is that while I'm glad I'm cut, I'm more glad that I have a dick that works, and that it is much larger than normal.

As an aside, I've got a friend who has a genetic trait that none of the men in his family have foreskins....he says it's from his father's side of the family. They are all uncut because there is nothing to cut. Their foreskins are so short, that it just barely touches the corona of the head. I've seen him in the shower at the gym and it looks like he's just cut loosely. I forget how we got on the subject of being cut or not and he said that he wasn't cut. I told him that it looked like he was.....that's when he launched into this story about his genetic lack of foreskin. It's pretty funny and he's cool about it. He told me that he likes being uncut but having no skin. LOL