duzyamuthano: i was uncut until i was 18, when i was circumcised due to phimosis (a foreskin too tight to roll back over the glans). i take my hat off to the surgeon who 'did' me: the scarring is minimal, and very close to the head, so that when i'm hard it's kind of difficult to tell which i am.
as a gay man, i prefer uncut cocks, since a) to me they look more natural, and b) there's more to play with. it's kind of nice to know when you first see a flaccid uncut dick that there's more on offer than first meets the eye ;). for myself, i'd prefer still to have my foreskin, but given that its removal was my choice i'm happy with what i've got.
i note what people say about hygiene, and it's certainly true that uncut + bad hygiene = yuk in many cases. but we roundheads can be guilty of insufficient grooming as well: it just doesn't manifest itself in the same way.
but beauty doesn't all reside in the foreskin, and like others here i've seen ugly uncut penises and dreamy circumcised dicks. i think the bottom line, though, is that each man should have the penis that he elects to have, rather than have an amputation inflicted on him at an age when he's entirely unable to protest or resist. (i know this is probably going to provoke ire...) |