David Caputo

Atia · 03-19-2006

How come I can't view the photos?

alex8 · 03-19-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim37

I could not get the links to work.

Because this thread is from about 120 B.C. and they've been disabled for months. Which is why I pointed to the new thread:

http://lpsg.org/showthread.php?t=24782

..., which has a few of the key images in it. Otherwise, you can check out the Caputo group on Yahoo whose URL is given in several places over these threads.

sundayssad · 03-19-2006

Am I the only one who thinks it kinda looks sorta fake? The size seems slightly inconsistent through out the photo albums.

That said, I hope it's real.

andy1985 · 03-21-2006

Clearly, this guy is real, whether or not his name is David Caputo, and he is hung.

The only question is, are some of the photos of him circulating on the net photoshopped to make his dick even bigger. The answer is definitely, yes.

If you look at the Yahoo group dedicated to Caputo, there are quite a few albums taken by a photographer called Charlotte York. Look in particular at http://ph.groups.yahoo.com/group/dav...os/browse/39a5. There are some shots there of Caputo with a hard on. They look pretty natural. I don't think they are photoshopped.

He looks big in these shots -- my guess is 8 or 9 inches -- but he is not megahung the way some of the other shots floating around make him look.

pantyboy · 03-21-2006

Did anyone see 'Rome' on HBO ?
There a very well hung "slave" being paraded in front of several women, showed full frontal for a coupla minutes.

I heard somewhere that this was Caputo. Does anyone know for sure ?

Sorcerer · 03-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by pantyboy

Did anyone see 'Rome' on HBO ?
There a very well hung "slave" being paraded in front of several women, showed full frontal for a coupla minutes.

I heard somewhere that this was Caputo. Does anyone know for sure ?

It didn't look a thing like him

alex8 · 03-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorcerer

It didn't look a thing like him

Ergo, we are dealing either with an unknown amateur photographer; an established photographer using a one-off jokey pseudonym; or merely an in-joke pure and simple.

IanTheTall · 03-23-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by alex8

As regards the point made about several "Caputo" poses being the work of Charlotte York, it is intriguing to note that there is not one single other image credited to anyone of that name anywhere on the Internet. However, it is of course the name of Kristin Davis's character in Sex and the City.

Ergo, we are dealing either with an unknown amateur photographer; an established photographer using a one-off jokey pseudonym; or merely an in-joke pure and simple.

It is too bad that the group has the members area is deactivated, it would at least tell us if the group is owned/moderated by charlotte_york; the profile page offers no additional information either.

That aside, I do wonder if Caputo will become the next Gunner.

IanTheTall · 03-25-2006

Got these through the "castroandmarket" yahoo group a few days ago:
http://www.lpsg.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=556&stc=1&d=1143335141
http://www.lpsg.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=555&stc=1&d=1143335141
http://www.lpsg.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=554&stc=1&d=1143335141

Here is the odd thing, these are the ones that look altered. The boxer briefs button-fly and part of the elastics logo are missing, in the color bedroom shot. The balls and a bit of the thigh, next to the smaller penis, seem to lower contrast than the nearby skin.
The bathtub shot has a a darker shade of gray where the head of the uncut head was, in the other pic, and the grout seems to be missing, above the smaller penis.
The office shot, the penis' shadow seems too large and too dark, plus the outer thigh has an extra shadow (conversely the two shadowy areas are not connected with each other).

Everything now seems suspect, meaning the large and the small penis shots.

mindseye · 03-25-2006

/Those/ look believeable. And *still* quite hot. ;)

edit: Based on your comments, I looked at them a little further. You may be on to something, particularly with the middle shot of the group. Some of the discoloration maaaaaay just be a digital artifact, though.

Atia · 03-26-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by EnglishMan

Just makes you want to drop to your knees

I can't see a darn thing...