10-26-2004
|
#31 (permalink)
| | | Quote: Originally posted by madame_zora@Oct 26 2004, 02:43 AM Personally, having seen over 1000 hard dicks, I find that average absurdly high! If the medical studies are all wrong and Durex is right, well I guess that answers itself. | Now, am I intimidated by a woman whose number of sexual partners eclipses mine by 1.67 orders of magnitude? | | | |
| |
10-27-2004
|
#32 (permalink)
| | | Quote: Originally posted by Karen@Oct 22 2004, 10:57 PM Hard to believe some of these averages.
In UK the Durex company work on an average of 6.75". Since they have no axe to grind other than making money, there seems no reason to dispute that.
6.5 to 7 seems about average in my experience as well, and my friends bear that out (well, the ones I talk to about that kind of thing!)
I think there is a deal of massaging undersized men's egos in an Agony Aunt kind of way.
No need for that here thank goodness!! | Actually, the Durex study put the average penis at 5.9 inches, with Black men averaging slightly more than 1/2 inch above average and Asians about 1/2 inch below average. Native Americans, they say, measure slightly smaller than Asians. Whites and Hispanics came in at 5.9 inches erect. Just over 90% of men measure 6 3/4 or less, which is probably why that is the size the company makes condoms for.
Regarding the racial breakdown, I don't know that their study had a large enough sample of any of the groups other than caucasians. But these are the results they report.
Personally, I still don't see how I could get a fully hard boner with two nurses and a doctor waiting to measure me. The original Kinsey study, by the way, I believe used a flacid stretch method of determining legnth. | | | |
| |
10-27-2004
|
#33 (permalink)
| | | Quote: Originally posted by jonb+Oct 26 2004, 09:41 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jonb @ Oct 26 2004, 09:41 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Oct 26 2004, 02:43 AM Personally, having seen over 1000 hard dicks, I find that average absurdly high! If the medical studies are all wrong and Durex is right, well I guess that answers itself. | Now, am I intimidated by a woman whose number of sexual partners eclipses mine by 1.67 orders of magnitude? [/b][/quote]
Care to make it 1001? Silly boy, I said I SAW them not had sex with all of them! A goodly number of these were during the time I was a massage therapist (please hold all jokes). Very few men can get through a massage without getting an erection, so I got to see quite a lot. I never required my clients to wear a towel, so they were just "out there". Does that put your mind at ease at all?
Also, when figuring the exact equation, you must allow for the differential of my sexually active years (nearly 30) as compared to yours (?), it's really not as bad as it sounds. | | | |
| |
10-27-2004
|
#34 (permalink)
| | | Quote: Originally posted by jonb+Oct 26 2004, 09:41 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jonb @ Oct 26 2004, 09:41 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-madame_zora@Oct 26 2004, 02:43 AM Personally, having seen over 1000 hard dicks, I find that average absurdly high! If the medical studies are all wrong and Durex is right, well I guess that answers itself. | Now, am I intimidated by a woman whose number of sexual partners eclipses mine by 1.67 orders of magnitude? [/b][/quote]
OK, jonb, help us out here. If x= your # of sexual partners and y=1000 and y eclipses x by 1.67 orders of magnitude, what does x equal? | | | |
| |
10-27-2004
|
#35 (permalink)
| | | Quote: Originally posted by madame_zora@Oct 27 2004, 01:53 AM Care to make it 1001? Silly boy, I said I SAW them not had sex with all of them! A goodly number of these were during the time I was a massage therapist (please hold all jokes). Very few men can get through a massage without getting an erection, so I got to see quite a lot. I never required my clients to wear a towel, so they were just "out there". Does that put your mind at ease at all?
Also, when figuring the exact equation, you must allow for the differential of my sexually active years (nearly 30) as compared to yours (?), it's really not as bad as it sounds. | LOL You're right; few men can go through a massage without getting aroused. Especially from a woman with your, ah, talents. I guess eunuchs and to some extent gay men can go through without getting aroused. | | | |
| |
10-27-2004
|
#36 (permalink)
| | | Well I never gave a massage to a eunich, but plenty of gay men got boners! I always started out on the back, so in the face down position, I suppose they could imagine whatever they wanted! It was a rare occasion to flip a guy over and not see his erection, which I just found kind of endearing in a wierd sort of way. They felt vulnerable and I felt powerful, it was pretty cool. There are a few I remember to this day, and that was about 12 years ago.
Talents? Yeah, I got to the point where I could put a guy to sleep by just massaging his hands (which I would do if the guy was being an asshole, he'd wake up and think he really had fun!). I read a lot of books about where nerve endings are located and got into using music, scents and lighting to heighten the experience. Kind of a fun year. | | | |
| |
10-27-2004
|
#37 (permalink)
| | | Actually, I was referring to two talents in particular. Large, bouncy talents. | | | |
| |
10-28-2004
|
#38 (permalink)
| | | mr.president: OMG blar is that you??? if so i have seen so many blars on the internet and all of them have turned out not to be the one i know :P i tried pming you but your inbox is full
on topic now funny thing about condom studies is that you will find a lot that are made up.......how do you know??? well if your getting the info from a website and it has penis enlargement adds then all the info on the site is made to make you buy pills | | | |
| |
11-20-2004
|
#39 (permalink)
| | | The Durex study is most definitely self-measured. So take an inch of the average.
Having clarified this: In a self-measured study, blacks are always going to have "larger" organs. I use quotations because this is obviously not true. Black culture is one of exaggeration and over-compensation. This is consitent with rap lyrics, "trash-talking" in basketball, etc. A couple of months ago, we talked on the LPSG how a significant percentage of famous rap artists claimed to have 9", 10".....67" penises in a recent VIBE article. Of course these men were lying.
I've had numerous black girlfriends who said that black men were indeed not larger and cited the exact same reasons for the myth...namely, they're trying to live up to a stereotype. Whenever I'm using a urinal next to a black man, I alway feel bad for him, because I know the odds are that my 6" flaccid penis is twice the size of his. I know that this man will not dare even take a peak, so as not to destroy his delusion.
The only people I know who perpetuate this myth (with the exception of black men themselves) are naive, sexually inexperienced non-black women who will never know the dissapointing truth because they would never share a bed with a black man to begin with----- I hope you see my harsh point...it's a fantasy and just that. People have this fantasy becaus they know the odds of it materializing are nill. If they allowed this to happen, there goes the fantasy. The mysterious and unknown sparks the imagination. | | | |
| |
11-20-2004
|
#40 (permalink)
| | | Well, we all know that no man would ever lie about his penis size and no woman would ever lie about her experience or abilities, right? LOL at this whole thread! The reasons these stories are so absurd is ego, plain and simple. | | | |
| |
11-20-2004
|
#41 (permalink)
| | | I don't just think it's a black thing; it's an American thing in general. Heavy metal artists are just as bad about the violence. Look at how much Americans consume: If the other 5.7 billion people on this planet lived the same way, we'd have to terraform the moon, Mars (and both its moons), Venus, and most of Jupiter's moons. | | | |
| |
12-10-2004
|
#42 (permalink)
| | | Largest penis by race
In the Dr. Jacobus survey definite penis size differences on a basis of race were detected. The largest Arab penises were found to be between eight and ten inches; but it was among the Muslim Sudanese that Jacobus found "the most developed phallus" - notably "one of the maximum dimensions, being nearly 12 in. in length, by a diameter of 2- in." The hardy researcher remarked that this was "a terrific machine" - "more likely the penis of a donkey than of a man." He concluded that the "Sudanese Negro possesses the largest genital organ of all the races of mankind". In a less extensive survey, but equally interesting, Dr. Robert Chartham measured erect penises for groups of men of various nationalities. The largest organs for each nationality were as follows: English - 10½ in.; West German - 8½ in.; Negro - 7½ in.; French - 7¾ in.; Danish 8 in.; American - 7¾ in.; and Swedish 7¾ in. The groups were small, ranging from only 9 to 121 individuals; nevertheless the data acquired are not without significance.
I can not find it right now but there is a measured survey that stated men of african descent were larger when soft than caucasian men when generally their erections are about the same.
So far this seems rather true. Whether black or white the average size seems to be about 6 inches.
Oh and I agree with Madame the average seems to keep getting smaller. I personally thik they keep changing the statistics to make men feel better about themselves. | | | |
| |
12-12-2004
|
#43 (permalink)
| | | But Jacobus' work was 70 years ago, back when pretty much all ethnography was done by outright racists. Except for at Columbia, of course; there was actually a racist spam almost a decade ago where Franz Boas played the villain in a Jewish communist conspiracy. Strange because he managed to spam every newsgroup and email address at the same time. | | | |
| |
12-13-2004
|
#44 (permalink)
| | | Quote: Originally posted by thirdlegmeat@Nov 20 2004, 03:56 AM The Durex study is most definitely self-measured. So take an inch of the average.
Having clarified this: In a self-measured study, blacks are always going to have "larger" organs. I use quotations because this is obviously not true. Black culture is one of exaggeration and over-compensation. This is consitent with rap lyrics, "trash-talking" in basketball, etc. A couple of months ago, we talked on the LPSG how a significant percentage of famous rap artists claimed to have 9", 10".....67" penises in a recent VIBE article. Of course these men were lying.
I've had numerous black girlfriends who said that black men were indeed not larger and cited the exact same reasons for the myth...namely, they're trying to live up to a stereotype. Whenever I'm using a urinal next to a black man, I alway feel bad for him, because I know the odds are that my 6" flaccid penis is twice the size of his. I know that this man will not dare even take a peak, so as not to destroy his delusion.
The only people I know who perpetuate this myth (with the exception of black men themselves) are naive, sexually inexperienced non-black women who will never know the dissapointing truth because they would never share a bed with a black man to begin with----- I hope you see my harsh point...it's a fantasy and just that. People have this fantasy becaus they know the odds of it materializing are nill. If they allowed this to happen, there goes the fantasy. The mysterious and unknown sparks the imagination. | Ya I find most of this to be pretty true. I got in an argument once with a very cute little asian girl. Her boyfriend is a major spreader of that rumor. She was arguing that she could never date a white guy because black guys and hispanic guys are much better hung. I asked her how she knew that. she said because her current boyfriend is the most well hung guy at the scholl at 7".
:huh:  I told her "Sorry to burst your bubble but I have a full inch on that plus i'm probably thicker." She got pissed off. But was still curious she asked if I was lying I said I had no reason to your not going to date me. I just wanted to let you know that your boyfriend was lying to you.
That was pretty much the end of that. Do you see what guys do to girls? They put silly ego driven notions in their heads and young naive girls don't know any better. My current girlfriend's last boyfriend claimed to be 8" long. When he ended up showing her she realized he was a bloody liar and barely had over 6. He's a big white guy so don't think it just happens in certain groups all guys exagerate.
Thus why when I eventually told her she just assumed I was lying. Scared the hell out her when she finally delt me through a pair of tight black jeans. | | | |
| |
12-13-2004
|
#45 (permalink)
| | | Rumors get started quite a bit. But the fact remains, at best, you might find a different distribution. I wonder if we start dividing racial groups into monophyletic types, if we'll get an actual idea of who's more hung. It's like the old "race and brain size"; ironically, some of the largest crania are Xhosa (Yay, Mandela!) and among the smallest are Tyroleans. (Sorry, Adolf.)
And of course, any woman who dates a man solely for his size is a tramp. | | | |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 PM. | |
Latest Threads | | |
Latest Posts | | |
Latest Blogs | | | |