Quote:
Originally posted by HORSEHUNGshowoff@Jun 14 2004, 08:23 AM
[b] Apparently the meaning of my message went Right over your head |
This is coming from the man who writes in a font size larger than my sig.
I tremble in fear.
Anyhows, in the world of glamour and movies, a lot of people tend to think of celebrities as being somehow "greater" or more important then their own lives. If Tom Cruise was hung, or whether he isn't, that doesn't concern me. I may like some actors in films, I may even think that they are rather cool, but when it's "hammer time", I don't think that their importance in my life is so high that their sexual nature is an issue worthy of my interest (unless I'm chronically bored).
Anyway, the idea of masulinitiy has changed, while the old sterotypes of what women are supposed to be hasn't really. Unless women's lib really did boost the role of dominant S&M women!
Back to men, you get the hairless smooth ones that girls dig, the muscular "Ah-nold's" the intellectual heavyweights, the George W Bushes...all sorts of male standards of sucess and prosperity that people look up to. With a lot of these people, penis size isn't a concern.
Perhaps they are assumed they are hung? I can't be bothered writing an essay on it.